In its 523 Year, West’s Conquest Goes Nuclear

How the West turned Ukraine in their casus belli for war with Russia

When 50,000 people are slaughtered with impunity in a civil war, which officially does not exist in Ukraine (1), western “democracies” call this “a revolution of dignity”.

They feel “dignified” when a government they supported bombed children in their homes while they were doing their homework. A darling Nazi of theirs has even called it “the revolution of kindness”, which probably is so for them, since they believe that cruelty, bloodshed, burning people alive and terror are virtues. They did not get to torture children prior to killing them, like those they consider today “national heroes” did in their days of glory; probably this seems “kind” to them.


This 6 year old girl was killed on June 8 in Slavyansk when the Ukrainian army bombed her home; one of the hundreds of children bombed in their homes by the Kyiv government.

Such an appetite western imperialists have discovered they have for “revolutions” (how they call colonization these days), that they are willing to risk a nuclear war to see their “ideals” become reality. Actually all that happened in the past year is the mis-en-scene for such a war that United States strives for. Western propaganda still claims that Nazis in Ukraine are a marginal sector, when in fact they have colonized state police, they have been incorporated in the army, and in the security forces, they control universities, positions in administration and government, they are in the parliament, their staunchest ally is the prime-minister of Ukraine (IMF’s man), and their word is law for the president of Ukraine. The United States’ department official Victoria Nuland lied to the US Congress that they were “a minority”, when in fact they represented the main force which confiscated state power in February 2014. It’s not just some battalions in the civil war, as Ukrainian ambassador to Germany lied when interviewed by a German channel (2); it’s politicians, university professors, what they call “professional elite”, journalists, NGOs. During the 2013-2014 coup they were presented in the media as some spontaneous movement which came out of nowhere, when in fact they were the organizers and determined the escalation of violence and bloodshed so that the coup can be legitimized on the blood of their own (3). Unlike other countries, in Ukraine, the politicians are the political arms of the militarized Nazis, not the other way around. Their only masters are some oligarchs who finance them, and not even those in some cases.

The Nazis rewrote the history to turn it into their ideological propaganda, and their political views have been imposed on the rest of the society with sheer violence over the past year. These Nazis are spread in different political forces to create the impression that there are more political parties, in fact wherever they are they follow the same ideology and program: that of UNA-UNSO, the political and ideological heirs of fascist and totalitarian OUN and UPA. The only difference as compared to Nazi mass criminals from OUN/UPA is that their arch-enemies, the Russians, are the first and main group of population they want to exterminate now, while other minorities they intend to assimilate. They trained and were trained for the February 2014 fascist coup for years, and they were fiercely supported by the fascist Ukrainian diaspora, especially those in the United States and Canada. (See separate blog about what “the national revolution” means in Ukraine, who, how and why have imported it from Ukrainian fascist diaspora.)

Since Ukraine has been “maidanized”, a year ago, they returned to their official chant “Glory to Ukraine (Slava Ukraini!), “Glory to the Heroes!”(Heroiam Slava!), often followed by “Death to enemies!” 

This was adopted by OUN Bandera as the official chant of the Ukrainian state in 1941, when they also adopted the fascist salute as their national salute. Both, the chant and the fascist salute, are implicit to each other.

This is significant because the return to the Akt of June 30, 1941, in which Yaroslav Stetsko explicitly pledged Ukrainians’ loyalty to Hitler and Nazi Germany, was a constant demand by fascist Svoboda after 1991.

Unites States Secretary of State John Kerry officially recognized the fascist salute of Ukraine as such, in an official document he sent to Ukraine, praising the February 2014 coup d’etat in Kyiv.


Lviv 1943, SS Galicia “volunteers” – recruited by OUN, members of UPA – parade.


Nazi crusaders from Azov showing their loyalty to Hitler and doing a sign to salute ISIS-like terrorists; this photo was taken October 2014 on the front in eastern Ukraine.

14th Waffen Grenadier Division of the SS (1st Galician) parading in Lviv, 1943

UPA parading in Lviv in 1943 as part of 14th Waffen Galicia Division of the SS (1st Ukrainian); in the past two years they had exterminated hundreds of thousands of Jews, Russians, after previously exterminating entire populations of Poles, before the invasion of Germany. They either deny these massacres and pogroms or justify and take pride in them, there is absolutely no remorse, or regret. They also massacred lots of Ukrainians whom they could not subjugate, communists, socialists, Soviet partisans to pursue towards their “national revolution” whose ideological aims coincided with those of Nazi Germany regarding Russia and their views on “the Aryan blood”.

After the celebrations of one year since the coup in Kyiv, in south-east Ukraine, in the town of Tsurupinsk people vandalized the memorial to “the heroes of heavenly Sotnia”, how the dead from the maidan are called. Their names were covered in shit.


This picture was taken during the coup d’etat in Kyiv; it was placed there by UNA-UNSO (the heirs of OUN/UPA). History of UPA, OUN and Bandera has been totally rewritten so that OUN’s “national revolution” could be pursued for the creation of an “Aryan Ukrainian empire” “by God’s will”, on the lands which are the territories of Russia. OUN and UPA were Nazi collaborators, willing and enthusiastic participants and even instigators in the Holocaust committed in eastern Europe together with Hitler’s death squads.


50,000 people are estimated by German intelligence to have been slaughtered in the civil war in eastern Ukraine, in less than a year. Villages and cities were systematically bombed by the Ukrainian uniforms and the region, which produced 15% of Ukraine’s GDP is destroyed to such extent that was only seen during the WWII.


Nazi UPA march as SS Galicia division in Lviv, 1943. History has been rewritten – in particular by the US and Canada governments and by an army of historians – also with the intention to portray the lie that they were “fighting the Soviets and the Nazis”, in a premeditated systematically enforced attempt to equal Nazism and state Communism, and with the intention to demonize the Soviet Union, and hide their own crimes committed as members and collaborators of Hitler’s death squads on the eastern front. The equal sign must be forced between the two also to keep leftists (anti-capitalists) down and deny them the space to challenge capitalism, and to relentlessly discredit them in times of growing capitalist crises (anti-capitalists are much more diverse than mainstream “experts” admit).


UPA parading in Lviv in 2011, they are considered heroes in Ukraine and the post-fascist coup ruling power wants to force Ukrainians pay them special war pensions for war crimes and atrocities they never faced justice.

A CIA memo from July 1958 described the Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) as “monolithic in character, violently anti-communist, and totalitarian in concept. It is headed by Stepan Bandera with Mr Stetsko being second in command.”

Mr.Stetsko (left) greeting Nazi occupants of his country

In the left of this picture, Stetsko greeting the Nazi occupiers in 1941. See separate photo blog.


Stetsko and Bush in the United States in the ’80; Reagan told the Ukrainian Nazi that “your dream is our dream.”

A memo from 1946 said that in supporting Bandera, US should know that his gang was “a terrorist organization, determined to accomplish its objectives by terroristic means,” and that this was why the Soviets were preoccupied with them. The war in Ukraine between the Soviets and Bandera’s Nazi terrorists continued until 1953, and in fact it never stopped.


Ukrainian Nazis ceremony in Lviv, 1943. History is continuously rewritten and turned into a brutal fascist and military ideological indoctrination, as state policy in Ukraine after the fascist coup of 2014. Prime-Minister Yatsenyuk, the staunchest political ally of Azov’s Nazis, has even told a German TV that “the Soviet Union invaded Germany”, when he knows very well that UPA and OUN secretly helped Hitler plan Operation Barbarossa. The president of Ukraine has approved UPA’s day to be national day in Ukraine, and has forbidden the celebration of the Soviet Union’s defeat of Nazism, which was celebrated on February 23rd. (See separate blog on OUN-Bandera/UPA history and how they are rehabilitated after the western-backed coup in Kyiv in February 2014, and why this is important to understand what “the national revolution” means in Ukraine.)

These are the people United States, UK, Germany, Sweden, Canada and Australia have brought to power in Ukraine in the coup of February 2014. They are the sons, the nephews, and the ideological and political heirs of the Nazi terrorist UPA and OUN. 

The commandments of the totalitarian and fascist OUN/UPA, justifying mass slaughter, torture, rape, slavery “in the name of Ukraine”; those who follow them are the ones who control state power in post-coup Ukraine:

“1. Attain a Ukrainian State or die in battle for It.

2. Do not allow anyone to defame the glory or the honor of Your Nation.

3. Remember the Great Days of our efforts.

4. Be proud of the fact that you an heir of the struggle for the glory of Volodymyr’s Trident.

5. Avenge the death of Great Knights.

6. Do not speak of the cause with whomever possible, but only with whomever necessary.

7. Do not hesitate to commit the greatest crime, if the good of the Cause demands it.

8. Regard the enemies of Your Nation with hate and perfidy.

9. Neither requests, nor threats, nor torture, nor death can compel You to betray a secret.

10. Aspire to expand the strength, riches and size of the Ukrainian State even by means of enslaving foreigners.”


Badge on Ukrainian uniforms urging them to take slaves from east Ukraine.


nazi salute ukr army

Ukrainian military in the civil war waged against eastern Ukraine showing their historical loyalty has remained unchanged: they are doing the Hitler salute, just like OUN and UPA did.


Boys in Krasny Liman kidnapped by Ukrainian Nazis on June 5, 2014. It seems they took them to the civil war by force. Most are 18-20 years old.

una unso kremlin on fire

sna wishing to attack moscow

This was posted by all pages of the Ukrainian Nazis and it shows Moscow is their aim in the civil war they wage against the population of Donbass. That’s a swastika on the helmet.

una unso program applied today national revolution

UNA-UNSO program for “the dictatorship of the nation”, step by step enforced by the state of Ukraine after the February 2014 fascist coup.

U.S.’s Karl Rove: “We’re an empire now, we create our own reality.” 

Ukraine is the breaking point of the confrontation between the West and Russia which did not take place at the time of the World War II, and has been turned into a weapon which the West has no reluctance to use in their attempts to conquer Russia, which is one of the most desired prizes of the 523 year old Conquest (today it’s also called imperialism) (4).

It’s relevant that the allies Moscow has found to counter-attack Western hegemony all come from the lands devastated by the Conquest along the history: Latin America, India, China, Cuba, South Africa.

The coup in Kyiv was the first step towards the aggression against Russia – in less than a year, US-NATO tanks paraded 1 km from the Russian border. Still, NATO has the audacity to complain that Russia treats them as enemy. This aggression grew gradually, as Moscow found ways to respond by counter-attacking and dismantling the casus belli it saw being fabricated. Along this crisis, Russia proved it does not want NATO’s war, but it also showed the West that it is willing to respond to their attacks (NATO finds this “outrageous”, of course).

Ukrainian officials instigate and plead for nuclear war: “We are not afraid” of “nuclear war”, not saying a single word about the tens of thousands of civilians the Ukrainian army and Nazis have systematically slaughtered, not mentioning one word about the over a million war refugees and displaced persons, or about the tens of thousands of Ukrainians who flee the country not to go kill in eastern Ukraine. They instigate nuclear war from positions which express state policy. This policy is identical to that promoted by the Nazis and fascists in their propaganda, ideological programs, and political actions; their views are mainstream political opinion in Ukraine (western propaganda keeps lying they are a “minority”; Canadian media even raise funds for them).

One of the first “revolutionaries” at the maidan on November 21st 2014, Svoboda’s Irina Farion, said “Ukraine must become the epicenter of another global war,” “the spearhead of the World War III”, “a victorious spearhead”, of course. This person, Farion, talked to uniforms who were deployed to crush eastern Ukraine (they call this “anti-terrorism” operation, though in reality is state terrorism, ethnic cleansing and political and ideological massacres), she told them: “You are the chosen ones, precisely you, the best of the best. You have been chosen to make us not only the nation of fighters, but also a revenging nation. You are going to revenge upon our enemies cruel and tough.“ The “enemies” (they usually call them “occupiers”) are the people in Russia after they are done with the inhabitants of eastern Ukraine. Yulia Timoshenko even demanded that the Russian speaking people in the east be “nuked”.

Western media is quite in line with Svoboda’s Farion: they presented nuclear war as “necessary” (The Economist), and even “progressive” (New York Times).


“The Economist, world’s sleaziest magazine”, read why here.

After the second World War, the Nazis who were adopted by the United States constantly instigated Washington to drop atomic bombs on the Soviet Union. Churchill also demanded United States nuke Russia. Truman administration even planned a 30 days military campaign during which US would have dropped 70 nuclear bombs on the Soviet Union to destroy 40% of its industry, followed by a ground “counter-insurgency” invasion using Hitler’s former death squads in eastern Ukraine “to wipe out the Red Army”.

In 1958, Nazi Yaroslav Stetsko, Bandera’s second in command, told US Congressmen that “atomic warfare” was the only option, if nationalism could not “dislodge and destroy the Russian Communist Empire”.

In the 80s, such war plans re-emerged, presented by Reagan as “the crusade for freedom (5); he even talked publicly about “a small nuclear war in Europe(6)Considering that Vatican’s Pope blessed Nazi Germany’s invasion of USSR as “a crusade against godless Bolshevism” the context of such language is confirmed today by US’s full support for the Nazis in Ukraine, who also see themselves not only as the ideological heirs of UPA and OUN, but also as the followers of medieval knights (Yarosh even said “we are knights”), and of Franco’s fascist crusaders who were helped by the Western governments and by Hitler and Mussolini to crush the workers’ social revolution in Spain, after they defeated the July 19, 1936 fascist coup. (The reasons for which Stalin betrayed them were explained by Rudolf Rocker in “The tragedy of Spain“.)

10155805_279701105527733_1325308840_n nazi crusader

Today western media follow the line of Hitler’s commanding military intelligence officer, Reinhard Gehlen (he too was adopted by United States after the war and founded Germany’s secret service, BND), who invented intentions Moscow did not have of invading Western Europe, as justification for United States launching nuclear war against it. This is insinuated and even repeated today by state leaders in the West; and it is openly promoted by the PR boys of Ukrainian Nazis in Ukraine. 

azov pr nuclear war inevitablespilno nuclear armsazov PR us must bring nuclear arms back to europe

Nazis’ plans = Nuland’s “Fuck the EU”

In West Ukraine, the World War II never really ended, and in eastern Ukraine the 1917 Russian revolution was not totally crushed and discredited. This is the internal historical timeline of the bloodshed Kyiv unleashed upon the east of Ukraine, which is the most brutal phase of the relentless cultural, economic , social and political oppression the east has endured especially since Ukraine became a separate state in 1991.  

The war Kyiv has waged against east Ukraine after the maidan fascist coup incorporates the traits of a brutal class war waged by the upper and upper middle classes – particularly those in Lviv and Kyiv – against the working classes from the industrial east. The gang fights among oligarchs in Ukraine, or among the Russian oligarchs and the Western ones, which intersected with the civil war, do not diminish the class nature of this conflict, which is so visible in the propaganda which denigrates and stigmatizes the people of Donbass and Russia.  

The Nazis in Ukraine have started the civil war against the east of the country with the intention to drag Russia into a long-term war which – they hoped – would weaken and collapse it from within, the same way, they claim, the ’70s war in Afghanistan undermined from within the Soviet Union and led to its disintegration (the war in Afghanistan was a factor). They hoped the war in eastern Ukraine would undermine Europe the same way it would weaken Russia – Nuland’s “Fuck the EU” translated (in her conversation with the American Ambassador in Kyiv, the 5 billion USD on this coup needed to be worthy; Nuland proved they were involved in the coup d’etat up to their necks, they discussed how to name their puppets in the Ukrainian government).

The United States admitted they were behind the coup in Kyiv and that they even forced Europeans to impose sanctions against Russia, knowing well that these sanctions would strangle Europe worse than Russia. Germany’s machinations were instrumental in orchestrating the coup in Kyiv and in the start of the civil war too, but after sanctions started to backfire, Berlin allied with France to play “the pacifist” (note, please, they could not care less about the tens of thousands Kyiv’s death squads have slaughtered in east Ukraine, they did it because it started to hurt their profits).

In March 2014, less than 2 weeks after the coup in Kyiv, an indoctrination commissar with the neo-Nazis from Right Sector, Olena Semenyaka, made public the stakes of the civil war they had prepared for decades:

The Ukrainian military capability lies in its street movements and militias (UNA-UNSO’s nazis, presented by western media as “volunteers”) that can drag Russia into a low intensity conflict… In the long run, Russia can be drawn into another Afghanistan should the people of Ukraine decide to go into a low intensity conflict. This may benefit the Great European Reconquista (their medieval crusade for spreading fascism to Europe and Russia) they plan for, since such a conflict will weaken Russian Imperialism and attract more support/ sympathy from Central and Western Europe. It can also weaken Europe beyond repair.”

RS war weaken Russia and Europe new Aghanistan

Therefore, Ukraine tried to trap Moscow into attacking her, so that the West’s aggression may be presented like an act of “defense”. The more Russia resisted, the more people were slaughtered in Eastern Ukraine, and even in Russia (Ukraine bombed Russia repeatedly, and several people were torn to pieces in their homes in Russia by Ukrainian bombs).

Ukraine has never stopped the slaughter in east Ukraine, even after official cease-fires, Minsk I and Minsk II. It just lowered its intensity.

Between Minsk I and Minsk II (September 2014 and February 2015), Ukrainian army has lost 500 square km to the rebels, while they decided to sacrifice thousands of their men.

Ukrainian Nazis were the ones who broke Minks I, and their president Poroshenko confirmed it publicly, after it happened. This is one of the many proofs that he is not in control of the Nazis, it’s exactly the other way around: Nazis control him.


The “logic” behind Ukraine insisting on losing men and territory – sometimes it seems they do it on purpose – is to create the reason for US’ military intervention, which will mean war with Russia.

Petro Poroshenko: “It’s the war for freedom and democracy of the entire EU.”

poroshenko the war of freedom

Adolf Hitler, 20 January 1941: “The task of this front, therefore, is not merely the protection of individual countries, but the safeguarding of Europe, and thereby the salvation of all.” 

right sector same as una unso !!!!!

Right Sector is the stage name for UNA-UNSO, since using directly the name of this Nazi organisation would have created too many PR problems for the western governments.


july 16 2012_sbu yarosh

Photo from July 2012. The guy in white traditional shirt is a nazi who is the boss of SBU (Ukrainian Gestapo). Next to him is Dmytro Yarosh. Both are UNA-UNSO too.

Ukrainian Revolution. Crusade.mp4_snapshot_04.05_[2015.01.02_01.16.25]

UNA-UNSO nazi crusaders marching on the streets of Lviv in the ’90s.

OUN’s tenets from 70 years ago are to be found in the political program of UNA-UNSO, and other fascists and Nazis, including the Nazis from SNA who are now part of the political alliance of prime-minister Yatsenyuk. This is the program which has been enforced for the past year as state policy in Ukraine. OUN used terror to keep their countrymen in permanent tension, to pursue the militarization of the entire society so they can be kept “combat ready” with all “occupiers”. Today Ukraine militarizes everybody and has made patriotic military education mandatory for everybody – state employees, working people, and kids in schools. (It’s a lucrative business for the Nazis since they charge them quite a lot so they can indoctrinate even 4 year old kids to stab, hang, shoot and blow up people). 

Poor children and orphans = Nazis’ a priori slaves 

The bombs and the economic terror fade in the face of what they do to children. Those they don’t bomb into their tiny graves in some backyard (the number of the civil war victims could be 10 times higher than Kyiv and UN admitted), they militarize into being “soldiers for the god and nation”. This is imposed by the Nazis in Lviv, and it’s a tradition among them, represented by the technocratic, military and fascist camps of Plast. Children are taught to be happy when they are cruel and hate, they put guns, knives and grenades into their hands in schools, and teach them to kill “the enemies of the nation.”


Nazi dinner in Ukraine, Russian doll representing a Russian child sacrificed for Bandera and Yarosh.



Right Sector Nazi showing a kid how to kill “for god and the nation”.


Kids taught to play patriotic games by executing enemies in medieval-like public executions.


Hundreds of schools in eastern Ukraine have been systematically bombed. This teenager was killed in a school in Donetsk when the Ukrainian army shelled with while pupils were in classes.


Kid in Ukraine being taught how to be a good Nazi.


What Kyiv propagandists call “a happy kid”. His home was bombed by the Ukrainian army; he is a war refugee.


War refugees from Slavyansk on a bus which took them to safety in Crimea. Slavyansk was bombed day and night for months by the Ukrainian army. 3 quarters of the local population is gone now: either killed or fled.


What Ukrainian Nazis did to children in the past, these kids are Polish children who were tortured and chopped by them.


This child was slaughtered by the bombs of the Ukrainian army in Gorlovka, this winter. The Ukrainian army and the Nazi battalions bombed Gorlovka on purpose, day and night, for weeks, to terrorize, destroy and kill as many inhabitants as possible. There was no military reason for bombing it, except the extermination of the local population.


Nazi kid teaching a girl to kill, in one of the military training camps in Ukraine in the summer of 2014. Look at the totenkopf, it has the same meaning as the one on the Nazi tank below, from the World War II:

The Waffen ϟϟ ☠ - Loyalty Is My Honor.mp4_snapshot_02.52_[2015.01.02_01.00.45]

Waffen SS tank invading Eastern Europe.


Babushka improvised a kitchen outside so she can keep kids and their families fed, during the winter they were forced to live in the basements where there was no electricity or heating. Winters in Ukraine are extremely cold.


Happy smiling Nazis that they were incorporated into the state police after they slaughtered, raped, tortured and killed in east Ukraine. They are doing the Hitler salute in an office of the Interior Minister. This is what Ukrainian officials call “keeping the Nazis under control”.


Nazis showing how they love to kill for the “Aryan master race” and the “Ukrainian empire”.


Government propagandist trying to explain how the Nazis are Nazis but don’t call them that. Stupidity is strong with this one. He did it on one of the war propaganda TV channels, sponsored by the United States in Ukraine.

Plast members at SS Galicia UPA in Lviv

Bandera Learn to make war in your youth in order to live peacefully in old age

Stepan Bandera was indoctrinated in Plast; this poster promoted children being indoctrinated to go to war so they can have “a great future”.

Члени Правого сектора завжди готові стати на захист Вітчизни.mp4_snapshot_01.28_[2015.02.28_18.14.31]

Kid trained in a camp of UNA-UNSO to shoot and kill, he’s 7 years old. This was filmed by a Ukrainian tv before the civil war was officially launched. Now this happens in all schools controlled by Nazis, just like UNA-UNSO program demanded.


Another proof that UPA criminals and terrorists were heart and soul on the side of Hitler’s Nazis. It says “Heil Hitler, Glory to Ukraine.”


Happy Nazi youth in Ukraine. One of the leaders of UNA-UNSO explained they are not interested for now to obtain positions of leadership in the state, that they are more interested to first export the Nazism of Western Ukraine to the rest of the country.

They are indoctrinated – in state schools and private military camps – into wishing to become “soldiers” and sacrifice their life “for the nation.” These Nazis hate children so deeply, that UNA-UNSO’s program even urged that children who live in orphanages be handed over to the “parent-state” – “the Ministry of Defence, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the security structures”- : “provide for the high level of national and patriotic education for orphans”, “liquidate the phenomenon of “orphans of alive parents”.”

That is, parents who are too poor to provide for their kids will have their children taken from them by the state to be used as patriotic meat. 

Adolf Hitler: “When an opponent declares, “I will not come over to your side,” I calmly say, “Your child belongs to us already… What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.” (Speech November 1933, quoted in The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich by William Shirer). 

They do this already.

The Ukrainian government has utterly shocked families from Aragon, Spain, when they demanded them to send back to Ukraine the children they took in Spain to study. The Ukrainian government wants to put these children in military training camps for a month, and after that send them to war.

The children are terrorized. The Ukrainian state did not allow the Spanish families to adopt these children – many come from orphanages – even before the coup, and now they received war mobilization orders even in Spain. The Spanish families hope to convince their government to grant them citizenship so they don’t send them to certain death. One of them comes from a village where most of his friends were already killed in the war. 

If they want these poor children dead, imagine how much they hate the children they bomb, slaughter and terrorize in east Ukraine. 

Ukraine uber alles, indeed!


2 million children are terrorized by the US-Kyiv civil war inflicted on Eastern Ukraine. What the Ukrainian prime-minister calls “peace and security” and “freedom and democracy”.

US support of violent neo-Nazis in Ukraine׃ Video Compilation.mp4_snapshot_00.13.18_[2015.02.28_19.02.24]


Houses, schools, hospitals, workplaces, any means of sustaining life in Eastern Ukraine have been systematically destroyed and bombed in Eastern Ukraine. Russian troops probably were hiding in that apartment following the “logic” of the Ukrop president.


The parents of a 4 year old boy cry at his funeral. He was killed by the bombs of the Ukrainian government.

Hitler’s “you don’t fight, you don’t deserve to live” = state policy in Ukraine today 

Ukrainian state hunts down young and old men in Ukraine and punishes them with 8 years in jail if they don’t go to war. There are protests all over Ukraine against this civil war – since September they have expanded all over Ukraine, even in the Nazi strong-hold, the west of the country; state political police and repression have grown worse too. In Kharkov, Ukraine’s Gestapo (SBU), which is run by a Nazi, took political police repression even in schools: they interrogated children about the political views of their parents. In south-east Ukraine, they threatened working women they will have them fired if they still opposed their sons being kidnapped by the state and send to the civil war.


Mobilization for the civil war in Ukraine:


Nazis kidnapping civilians from the villages of eastern Ukraine.

Anyone who calls it “civil war” and not “Russian aggression”, as the state demanded to be called by law, risks 3 years in jail. The ministry of truth in Ukraine asks internet users to report anyone they see opposing or boycotting the war. Anyone who protests the war could be arrested on the spot and jailed. Workers are taken from factories and forced to the front; this is probably in line with the economic war waged by western corporations against Ukraine: a German economic adviser ordered that the entire industry of Ukraine be shut down. The unemployed, millions of people, are the most vulnerable; men are hunted down even in game shops to be taken to war. SBU (their Gestapo) hunts down and arrests journalists who ask people to boycott the illegal war mobilization. Professors are fired, and students terrorize them if they oppose the war, like it recently happened in Lviv, when students created “a corridor of shame” to terrorize a professor who wrote a post against the war on her blog. Men run from Ukraine – especially to the “aggressor” Russia – to escape the war. They hide in neighboring countries too (only Poland and Estonia don’t take them in). Just one example, in the village Great Novoselka, an army officer tries in vain to convince protesting women to let their sons to war; when he says that they need to defend the country from “Russian troops” people burst into laughter, mocking him and telling him he is a liar. Some polls show 78% of Ukrainians want the civil war to be stopped by their government.


Ruslan Kotsaba, a journalist from Lviv, publicly urged all people to boycott war mobilization. He was spied upon by a SBU (Ukrainian Gestapo) snitch, hunted down and arrested for thought crimes for which the state plans to throw him to rot for 15 years in jail.

Embedded image permalink

Woman fighting a Nazi in Ukraine who came to take her son to the civil war: “Go to war yourself, you fucker!” The sons of politicians and oligarchs are not taken to war; and the rich can escape the front if they pay bribes which amount even to 2000 dollars.


SBU Nazi-like propaganda, calling on Ukrainians to denounce people who boycott the civil war. This is state-enforced propaganda, which exploded at first during the Odessa massacre, and later was adopted as state policy by the post-coup government in Ukraine. The people of eastern Ukraine are dehumanized as “Colorado beetle” by the Ukrainian state so that they can be exterminated more easily.


This was copied by SBU and promoted as state Nazi propaganda.

Women against the army and the state: “We did not raise our children for war.” “No way we’ll let them take our children. We will stand up for them now.” “Yatsenyuk bragged he’d take a bullet to the head. Let him take it now.” See video here.

Embedded image permalink

Odessa, naval station, February 2015: “This is not my war!” Odessa has been occupied by the Ukrainian military since January, when army troops were deployed in the city, after the city was kept under tight control by 3,000 Nazi squads employed by the state in the National Guard.

“This is not our war!” “My heart is tearing when I see our children dying. Who needs this? He has a belly and walks around, bastard! They should be whipped away from Parliament, all those who got bellies and make money from the war. I have a grandson, he’s 20. He got a notice. What is this? It’s impossible. I’m already in tears.” See video here.

Notice the difference: when Ukrainian soldiers were trapped and risked being annihilated last fall, Putin did intervene and convinced the rebels to let them go; they created a corridor and let them go back to their homes (except the Nazis, those they killed). The rebels captured Ukrainian soldiers and let them go many times, even after they saw that when exchanging prisoners, Kyiv handed over local civilians they kidnapped and tortured, while the rebels handed over Ukrainian soldiers.

In Debaltseve, the rebels protected the Ukrainian soldiers – who surrendered to them – from the artillery of their own army firing at them. When Ukrainian military units demanded permission to retreat because they were surrendered and they did not want to die; their commanders and the politicians in Kyiv ordered them to die.

This means that it’s not the Russians and the rebels in the east who want to inflict the greatest damage on the Ukrainian army, it’s the leaders in Kyiv. It’s them and NATO (US, UK, Canada) who want the war with Russia.

Officially, Kyiv considers the defeat at Debaltseve one of “the greatest victory of their nation”. It was actually the worst. If you follow Ukraine, you get used to absurd affirmations like this; in their political program which is that of UNA-UNSO it is stated that contradictory aims, affirmations, arbitrary decisions, deceit are their rules since “what is logic when national interests are at stake?”

After Minsk II, Kyiv’s cruelty grew even worse. They moved anti-aircraft rockets in Odessa (against Crimea?); they kept shelling Donbass, and cut the gas, social, education and medical benefits (even if courts in Ukraine said it’s illegal for Kyiv to steal them), they intensified the economic war against Donbass and denied anyone from this territory to enter the rest of the country. Basically, Kyiv separated Donbass totally from the rest of Ukraine. 

But, to the outside world, they cry that they are defending their “territorial integrity” and cry for foreign troops to join them in the war against Moscow (Nazis in Ukraine already consider the civil war in the east “a Ukrainian-Muscovite war”).

The contrast between Kyiv’s intentions and their propaganda could not be sharper.

They sacrifice their men and terrorize the population in the east as the western war machine – mainstream media – presents them as the victims of “those cruel Russians”.

They need the blood of their own spilled to impress and justify western ‘humanitarian” intervention or “for freedom and democracy”, when actually people in Ukraine live in fear and terror under their rule, and have lost right after right. 


“Galician SS go into combat” “Those who want to live must fight, and who doesn’t want to resist in this world of eternal fight does not deserve the right to live” – A. Hitler

Ukrainian Nazis about USSR: “It should have been our empire

Ukraine separated from the Soviet Union in 1991, and propaganda presents this as “a great act of liberation of a great people from oppression”. But the individuals, who were brought to power in Ukraine, after the February 2014 coup, actually hated USSR for not being their empire, not for being a totalitarian entity. 

The goal of the Organization of the Ukrainian Nationalists has always remained the same: to restore what they call “their” “Kievan Rus empire”, and reduce Russia to Moscow. They consider themselves to be “the real Russians”, this is why they specifically avoid to call people in east Ukraine Russians – which they are – but use all sorts of denigrating labels (Vatniks, Colorado beetle, genetic scum, sub-humans), and it’s why they call Russians “Muscovites”, “Moskali” or “Mongoloids”: they accuse them of mixing up with non-white people, a supreme crime in their eyes.

Video of Ukrainian kids jumping and shouting Nazi chants and demandingMoskali to the knives“:

They want Ukraine to be “a dictatorship of the nation”, and turn the country into one, step by step, just as Stepan Bandera, OUN’s ideologues and UPA planned 70 years ago. While they present themselves to the world as “the victims of Russian imperialism”, at home, their plans have not changed since 70 years ago: to destroy Russia by expanding on its territory because they are “they are a nation left by god” to become an Aryan empire.

Dmytro Dontsov, one of the ideologues of OUN: “The sole force capable of saving Europe is Ukrainian nationalism.”

Nazi Yaroslav Stetsko: “Fascism and Ukrainian nationalism are the links in the chain of a single world revolution.” 

Nazi death squads (SNA’s AZOV): “White Reconquista under the Black Sun. Today in Ukraine, tomorrow in Russia and Europe.

UNA-UNSO Nazi Dmytro Yarosh: “Reconquista is just beginning…” (Click for video

A nation which does not expand dies,” OUN ideologues, Svoboda, UNA-UNSO, SNA (Azov), other Right Sector.

There is no such thing as Russian language” – parliamentarian from Petro Poroshenko’s political formation 

Russians are not even Slavs” – neo-Nazi Dmytro Yarosh 

Our enemy has always been the Moscow nation itself as well as the current regime, whether Tsarist or Bolshevist, and the state and social system,” – Stepan Bandera, Nazi collaborator, Fuhrer wannabe, and today national hero of Ukraine.

A year after they confiscated state power with Western backing, the transition to power of the Nazis in Ukraine is almost complete. It’s likely that another coup is coming, as they did not get the war which they wanted so that their nation-state (“natiocracy” or dictatorship of the nation, as they call it) be completed. That is a war against Russia, which they accuse that hinders the realization of their own Ukrainian empire.

The national revolution” in Ukraine is specifically and openly against unions, and aims at strengthening the class society by replacing class with ethnicity, and forcing workers into total submission to “the natural elite”, which they see as an entity similar to the military casts during the times of Crusades.

The West cannot admit to their Nazis in Ukraine whom they put in power positions, because these Nazis were their allies during the Cold War; and because the way they plan to set up a “Ukrainian empire” coincides with US’ old obsession of colonizing Russia.

These Nazis consider USSR should have been “their empire” and they also say that they will not rest until they snatch territories from Russia. But you hear them everywhere in western media deploring “Russian imperialism”.

Somebody can say that these items contradict each other, but logic is nothing compared to the national interests.” (UNA UNSO program)

Dmytro Yarosh, neo-Nazi from UNA-UNSO, who trained terrorists in a group called Trident, explains what “the national revolution” means to them:

It is better for us to build our own National State! Does that mean knives to the Moskals and ropes to the Jews? Well, not so unsophisticated. There must be a Ukrainian authority in Ukraine; the titular nation must dominate in business, politics, and culture…Then, forced Ukrainization. Russians do not like it? Well, go back to fucking Russia! Those who don’t want to go, we can help them. Russians are not even Slavs… Next we will liberate our lands: Voronezh, Kursk, Belogorod Oblast, and Kuban. These are all Ukrainian lands!” (video here)

These regions he mentions are in Russia, but they claim they belong to them since they claim to be the heirs of 1600s entity called Kievan Rus; in this way they are trying to appropriate the history of Russia and Belarus too; crazy as hell, but don’t expect logic or common sense from them.


“Ukrainian empire” map on a car at the maidan in 2014.

This is why they call the war in east Ukraine “a liberation war” for propaganda purposes, but they in fact consider it just a phase in a larger lebensraum war, and consider all the inhabitants there “occupants” or “insurgents”.

The war in eastern Ukraine – which Western propaganda constantly blames on Russia – is a political and economic weapon against Russia and Europe. The Nazis in Ukraine want a return to the “Europe of the nations”, they hate the fragile progress European workers have forced upon the ruling elites over decades, towards social justice; their hatred is shared by “the American business model” which is probably horrified there are still some unions (though extremely weak) in Europe.

Soros’ “Participatory democracy” = Nazis crucifying leftists

In eastern Ukraine, propaganda blames the victims for the crimes and atrocities perpetrated against them by Kyiv’s death squads. So you were told by western media and Nazi-controlled state media in Ukraine that they bombed themselves for almost a year, and killed their children (to blame Kyiv, why else, duh!).

But you do not read a single word about the women and girls raped, tortured and beheaded, just some about the boys and men tortured, but no word on the boys summarily executed by the Nazis. On the contrary, Amnesty even recommended that the Nazis who tortured people in the east be incorporated into the state police so they can be taught “the law”.  

“Azov” battalion executes handcuffed unarmed half-naked man in cold blood in front of the cameras.

Woman from Lugansk tortured by Nazis from Aidar battalion, then drowned, because she spoke against them; US taxpayers paid for their food:

The people from eastern Ukraine were accused that they bombed their homes, hospitals, schools, roads, power plants, workplaces; those who were butchered and burned alive by the Nazis in the May 2 Odessa massacre “set themselves on fire” since they were “Russian thugs” (Carl Bildt), so now the survivors of the massacre are on trial for “terrorism” while the Nazis are “national heroes”, in the massacres of June-July 2013 from Mariupol they were “drug addicts”, later in January they again bombed themselves in Mariupol; in Kramatorsk they executed themselves with the guns of the Nazis; in January near Mariupol they blew up a bus packed with people which they placed on purpose near a road mine detonated by the Ukrainian army; in Donetsk they bombed their houses constantly, and then they started to blow up buses full of workers on purpose; in Lugansk on June 2, people were slaughtered not by Kyiv’s war plane, but by an air-conditioner (yes, you read that right) etc.

These are just several examples, such atrocities were facts of every single day and every single night, committed by Ukrainian army and the Nazi death squads for 10 months relentlessly.


Ukrainian army giving the finger towards the house of locals in eatern Ukraine after they bombed it to pieces. Such acts turn them into heroes in Nazi-Ukraine.


Donetsk, bombed by Ukrainian army.


Mariupol May 2, 2014. Locals stop Ukrainian army tanks with bare hands. A week later they came back and committed a massacre; followed by many others.

Why? Because THIS is what “the national revolution” means. The power of the war machine propaganda lies in the fact that this “national revolution” is not exposed and so it can no longer be disconnected from the atrocities committed by the Nazis in their war to “purify” “the land” (read, “their blood”) of “sub-humans” by extending their “living space”, and “avenge their knights”. All these are quotes from them and they prove they are Nazis and fascists.

Western media do not write either about the forced criminal poverty upon Ukrainians, since maidan gave them “independence” (turned them into another US colony); but that would mean to write about the real aggressor in Ukraine, which is the West. 


25 year old man crucified by Nazis on the fence of an Orthodox Church in Kharkov on September 30, 2014, for raising food, clothes and money for the people Kyiv was bombing in Donbass. No investigation, nothing.

The 2004 Orange “revolution” failed because the Nazis were not popular outside West Ukraine. But the love story between the Nazis in Ukraine and the Western governments is decades long.

After the coup, the West helped the Nazis set up their “parallel state(8), which is actually a war movement supported by United States in particular, and could be called “the deep state”, also known as industrial-miliary-security-complex. But they call it “participatory democracy” and praise it as “voluntarism”. New-speak has become the official language of western war propaganda machine and of western governments; also to make their capitalist actions credible they stole words, concepts, imagery and symbols from anti-capitalists (communists and anarchists) since they are very aware that capitalism is in deep shit and needs to associate itself with spaces which are breathable. Since capitalists steal the wealth produced by working people, of course it’s normal for them to steal their words too, isn’t it? The words they stole they use in ways exactly opposite to their meanings.

In eastern Ukraine, when “this participatory democracy” was attempted, for real, Kyiv responded with bombs. (Other people in Eastern Europe voting in referendum to fire West’s stooge were accused of committing a coup d’etat).

In Kyiv, the Nazis, supported, financed, armed and covered up by the West, are those who play the music and politicians dance to it or they are threatened to be dumped to the trash, literally. Two state officials admitted the existence of the nazis – United State’s Victoria Nuland and the Ukrainian ambassador to Germany. 


Secret grave near Odessa, spreading on kilometers where thousands killed in the civil war – most likely soldiers and civilians – are buried as “surgical waste”.

What Kyiv’s “liberation” of East Ukraine means:

Bombing is less cruel than starving them.”

Every time Kyiv wanted to invade and occupy their villages and cities, they again bombed themselves with the tanks, the Grads, and the war planes of the Ukrainian army, so that the Nazi death squads invaded them to “liberate” them from their own families. But Kyiv was the victim when it ordered the pilot of a war helicopter not to return after rebels warned him to go back or they would take him down – it happened in June when the Nazis from Kyiv and Odessa retaliated for their own crime, put on another show for the western televisions, and cried their hearts out in rage, while attacking the Russian embassy and the consulates in Odessa and Kharkov.


This journalist, who is also in Plast, urged the government in Kyiv to bomb people in eastern Ukraine with ballistic missiles so they can be killed faster, because “starving them is cruel”.

The people Kyiv’s death squads invaded were the ones guilty of Kyiv cutting the water, electricity and gas, they even starved themselves to death, they even bombed themselves in mines and workplaces. Theirs were the snipers who shot women and children on streets, in their cars, in their homes, before the civil war was unleashed upon them with all brutality – this is how propaganda goes.

Theirs are the snipers who kill workers in Donbass when they go to restore the water and electricity, each time after Kyiv’s shelling damages them.

The people of eastern Ukraine are portrayed as committing the atrocities Kyiv inflicted upon them after they identified them as “sub-human” (Hitler’s words shared by Ukrainian prime-minister and the Ukrop president); “vatniks” (hard working people who fight for an economic arrangement which guarantees their rights), “genetic scum”, “lumpen proletariat”, “drunken”, “dirty”, “cultural trash”, “materialists” (Nazis in particular call them so because they accuse them of not being able to believe in the “aesthetic spiritual idea of the nation”), “useless” (which cannot be exploited for profit, as Nazi journalist called them), “Colorado beetle”, “parasites”, “alcoholics”.


Nazis’ favorite stigmatizations for East Ukraine and Crimea are “occupants” and “colonizers” and these words hide the historical context of the civil war in Ukraine as well as the ideological justification for the slaughter. All these labels were coined by Nazis, embraced by politicians and turned into mainstream public opinion in the rest of Ukraine.

Since people of eastern Ukraine are such “savages” for these Nazis, they “must all be killed”, they must be bombed with ballistic missiles into extermination once and for all, because it’s “cruel” to starve them (and takes longer), as an U.S. sponsored Nazi journalist from one of the U.S.-sponsored war propaganda channels in Ukraine demanded publicly. 

Relevant for the racism embedded in the ideology of their “national revolution”, people in eastern Ukraine are also “Africanized” and identified with the third world (perceived as inhabited by “inferior races” by the Nazis in Ukraine because the great 1st world keeps them in poverty); the entities people in eastern Ukraine created in the referenda of May 2014 are denigrated as “Luganda” (the major language of Uganda) and “Donburas” (from Honduras). 

ukr nazis luganda


Luganda/Donburas, rebels in Donbas are represented as monkeys; the message of this cartoon very popular among Ukrainians is that the people from eastern Ukraine are “inferior animals”, “burden animals”.

75 La africanización de la bruja

Taken from Silvia Federici’s “Caliban and the Witch”: “The Africanization of the witch is reflected in this caricature of a ” petroleuse “. Observe their unusual rings, hat and African features, suggesting a relationship between commoner and “wild” African women slaves instilled courage to rebel, which haunted the imagination of the French bourgeoisie as an example of political savagery.”

In a more sophisticated way, which exposes how deep the racism is embedded in the American society, the same tactics have been employed by New York Times against Russians in Russia, who are portrayed living in some lawless suburb, ghetto maybe, where crime is like going out to buy bread, and one man, Putin, controls their mind so that women are lynched as entertainment (isn’t that a show copied from the United States, where politicians who order women to accept rape as “a gift from god” are constantly elected in the Congress, and where constant instigation to enslave them by having the state confiscate their bodies is just so normal?); these characteristics are meant to identify them to the Black population from the suburbs of the United States (also confirming these are perceived as “inferior” by the elite American paper, because of the race of the poor people who live there). If they do not want to behave like the western reporter expects them to, they must be insane, the western reporter knows. However, calling post-coup Ukraine “easily the most democratic and pro-European republic in the former Soviet Union” is, if not delusional, clearly a deliberate lie and if this is what they understand by “democracy”, then maybe these such western universal judges should keep it for themselves, because in Ukraine you go to jail if you say a word that contradicts their “democratic” government (he knows they do, it’s been on Russian TVs too, but too problematic for him to mention it). In this piece, lies perhaps better than anywhere else the same old mentality of the colonizers, who also wanted to save the natives when they massacred them systematically: to “save” them from themselves. 

right sector pressure teacher

UNA-UNSO (Right Sector) Nazis terrorizing a teacher to force him to submit into presenting the history of Nazi UPA the way they demanded.

This also shows a communion of cultural references between the Nazis in Ukraine and their supporters in the West. It’s just so ironic that they deny the right of the Russian speaking population in east Ukraine to their culture and their ties with Russia – when they give Kyiv the license to bomb them in their homes, this is exactly what they do – but their propaganda unites them as belonging to the same cultural space which they vilify employing classic methods of the white supremacy.

The people of eastern Ukraine are the victims of bombs and of racist, Nazi-like patriotic propaganda after Kyiv labeled them “terrorists” – in Ukraine, this word is used in the context in which fascists and Nazis have always called leftists “terrorists” for resisting them, exactly the way Pinochet’ junta did in Chile, and exactly how NATO’s Nazis from Gladio did in Italy in the ‘70s. (7)

Napoleon is always right” *

 The more the West failed to portray Russia as an aggressor in Ukraine, the worse the propaganda got. It’s a brutal war mongering propaganda, inherent to “the logic of colonization that inevitably must dehumanize and fear those it wants to enslave.” (8)


NATO and Ukraine’s flags during a march for war in Moscow organized by the Western-backed Russian opposition and diaspora; it was a march for war (typically for the war propaganda it was called of course “the peace march”) since the president of the “Open Russia” (please, see Chomsky’s explanation on what “open” means) said he wants to be president of Russia, not through elections (since he knows he’d never be elected), but through a regime change even if this could stir “some bloodshed” and “some civil war”. In spite of what western media claim, all that Russian media do is show what the West does in Ukraine, where working people have lost 2 thirds of their incomes in less than a year, in Kyiv and other cities they had no hot water the entire year, the government also reduced their electricity and now it has imposed ratio for food; while they kidnap their sons and force them to war.


Half of Azov are Nazis from Russia, some of them ran away to avoid justice for racist crimes; while in Ukraine they are welcomed and treated as heroes. They say they go to kill in the civil war in eastern Ukraine to help stir a white power fascist revolution in Russia, so they can “purify” their “nation” from non-whites.


Flags of nazis from Russia and Ukraine next to NATO’s at the march for war in Moscow in August.


Moscow, in August, Russian opposition march for war.

Thus, the ones who are to be attacked must be totally discredited in advance, so that anything they say in their defense must not be believed; isolated (sanctions), weakened (economic war – political manipulation of oil prices, banning of food imports, attacks on currency).

All these were imposed on Russia already, while the western governments still call it “aggressor”.

Russians must be denigrated, their own history is constantly denied by rewriting facts and always portraying Russians as “some inferior civilization”; significant here it’s the utter mystification of Western history by never admitting its systematic terror, and the article already linked is one of the best examples, which never mentions how capitalism and Catholicism are responsible for tens and tens of millions slaughtered, for the women burned at stake, for slavery and racism and the sheer plundering and famines committed by their empires everywhere they set foot, or the oppression, criminalization and killing their poor; which only afterwardsbecame state policy under tsarist Russia), and must be stigmatized to the point of dehumanization (racism). Russia must be portrayed as a rogue state, which takes down civilian planes, and guns down political opponents in front of the Kremlin.


Boris Nemtsov, presented by western media as the leader of the “liberal opposition”, was gunned down in front of the Kremlin to associate visually the crime with the Kremlin. His death was turned into a propaganda weapon. Nobody knows who shot him, but western media already found the culprit: Putin, even though the Western governments are those who hope to profit from it, by stirring mass protests in Russia and further discredit the Russian government. Nemtsov was at the maidan in Kyiv, other Putin’s opponents were there too; he intended to import the maidan in Russia. The word “liberal” used by Western media in portraying the Russian opposition does not have an ideological meaning here (Russian opposition are like Tea-Parties in the US), the meaning of this word is not leftist, as in Europe, but rather elitist capitalists who deeply despise and hate the working people on whom they imposed brutal criminal economic policies which put 20 million people in Russia in their graves ahead of the time in the ’90s. Nemtsov supported Navalny, who is also presented by western media as “liberal”, though he is a fascist and a racist, a white power “revolutionary”.

While corruption and internal politics are directly linked in Russia by western media to authoritarianism and poverty; corruption in the West is not, it’s seen as a deviation from the political and economic system and not inherent to it – a lie. That it is so it’s been confirmed by the corrupt politicians they put in state positions in Ukraine after the Western orchestrated coup; not to mention the Orwellian absurdity of having a fascist like Stepan Bandera, the nephew of OUN’s fuhrer wannabe, be presented around the 3rd-world-to-be-countries as some “democracy promoter”. 

Propaganda is most efficient when it singles out a target and focuses their attacks on it. In the way this propaganda is constructed the reasons of West’s intentions towards Russia can be depicted. It’s not only the absurd lies, it’s also a cultural construct which is needed by the aggressors in the demonization of their future (they hope) victims.

Putin is called by Ukrainian Nazis “a Jew” and “gay” (common among anti-Semites and fascists is to “Judaize” and feminize their enemies); of course, “a communist” (sadly, he’s not); Russians are called by the respected Ukrainian elite “mongoloid hordes” or Moskali, and are accused of “crimes against the purity of the white race”. Putin is also called “a Vatnik” to be identified with how they call the people of eastern Ukraine.

When propaganda in the West says “Putin”, people in Russia know it’s actually them they refer to; so then you have American journalists tell them they live in a “parallel universe” because aggressors cannot conceive their victims tell them to their faces what they actually are and do.

Western politicians called Putin “Hitler” (USA’s Hilary Clinton and McCain, UK’s Charles, UK’s Cameron, politicians from Australia, Europe, Canada, various propagandists of Kyiv, like Timothy Snyder, BHL, Anne Applebaum); priests in Kyiv said he was “under the influence of Satan”. Australian media portrayed him as a communist (again, too bad he’s not) under a panicked headline: “Russians are coming” (when in fact Australia stocks troops and weapons in Ukraine for a future invasion, same as US, Canada, and UK).

putin hanibal Htv gazetta polska

Considering how many people Kyiv government has killed in the east, benefiting from the support of Warsaw, US and other European governments, this could actually be what is called projection.

Polish media went a bit further and portrayed Putin as Hannibal Lecter, associating him visually to a cannibal serial killer from an American movie, and historically to the natives the Catholic capitalist conquistadors exterminated to steal their lands, resources and to destroy their cultures; after they had exterminated in Europe pagans, Jews, heretics, and burned alive and tortured hundreds of thousands of women so they can steal their bodies and turn the entire female population into baby-factories, and their slaves (which women still are in Poland even to this day). 

All of them were called cannibals, demons, and were accused of devilish crimes, such as eating children; that is, of crimes so sinister that it expelled them from the place where any compassion is conceivable. These accusations came from the upper classes of the European societies whose members did drink human blood in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries, especially of those who died of violent death. Not as insinuation of anything, just to note that Ukrainian prime-minister Yatsenyuk also said that “This (Donbass) is the area that he (Putin) wants to control, and through their mercenaries from Ukraine to drink its blood.” 

Colonizers, explains Silvia Federici, were those who created “the savages and the cannibals”, both in Europe and in the New World:

The use of devil-worship as a weapon to strike at political enemies and vilify entire populations (like Muslims and Jews) was already common among the elite. More than that, as Seymour Phillips writes, a “persecuting society” had developed within medieval Europe, fed by militarism, intolerance, that looked at the “Other” as mainly an object of aggression. Thus, it is not surprising if “cannibal”, “infidel,” ‘‘barbarian,” ‘‘monstrous races,” and devil worshipper were the “ethnographic models” with which the Europeans “entered the new age of expansion”, providing the filter through which missionaries and conquistadors interpreted the cultures, religions, and sexual customs of the peoples they encountered…. Most stigmatizing and perhaps projecting the Spaniards’ labor needs were “nakedness” and “sodomy,” that qualified the Amerindians as beings living in an animal state (thus capable of being turned into beasts of burden), though some reports also stressed, as a sign of their bestiality, their propensity to share and “give everything they have in return for things of little value.

Defining the aboriginal American populations as cannibals, devil-worshippers, and sodomites supported the fiction that the Conquest was not an unabashed quest for gold and silver but was a converting mission…

It also removed, in the eyes of the world and possibly of the colonizers themselves, any sanction against the atrocities which they would commit…, thus functioning as a license to kill regardless of what the intended victims might do.

And, indeed, “The whip, gibbet, and stock, imprisonment, torture, rape, and occasional killing became standard weapons for enforcing labor discipline” in the New World.” 

This is inherent to the Western (European and American) “cultural identity”, and always resurface when they need guns to replace appearances; so when “crats” in Brussels claim Europe needs “an identity” they should know they already have one and with their behavior towards Russia they did nothing less but to confirm it once more.

In this respect, they share the same aim with the Nazis whom they used in Kyiv to execute the armed coup d’etat a year ago.

In attacking Russia, the West tries to escape from what they cannot avoid: facing their own past. It’s a nasty one and it is exactly their past which discredits them by exposing their lies about “freedom and democracy”, if anyone needed more proof.

They speak constantly of “a Russian aggression” in Ukraine but they are those who are destroying the people in this country (not the rich ones) by instigating and fueling the civil war, by taking the sons from their mothers and the husbands from their wives so they can be cannon folder in prolonging the civil war; by land grabs, destruction of industry, and one of the most brutal forced poverty on working people, which will mean death for the most vulnerable in Ukraine. United States are pleased and salute this; they could not care less about the people who inhabit Ukraine, like they don’t care about the people who inhabit their own countries either. What they are interested in are their profits, and control over resources. They are only concerned that their propaganda not be exposed. 

Civil war in the east = the door towards fascist dictatorship in Ukraine 

Those in the east they bomb, those in the rest of Ukraine they rob blind. The civil war in eastern Ukraine goes hand in hand with the formalization of fascism in the rest of Ukraine: terror and repression have become a fact of life, fear has replaced doubt, the state has spies who deliver the critics of government to SBU (Ukraine’s Gestapo); anyone who criticizes the government or the war is “a Russian agent”; if anyone denies “the Russian aggression” they can be thrown in jail; journalists who tell people to boycott the mobilization for war are spied upon and arrested by the Ukrainian Gestapo, “linguistic experts” analyze their words and wording to identify thought-crimes and they face 15 years behind bars. If people post criticism of the war on their social media they will be arrested and jailed for 3 years. SBU has set up a propaganda department, which is led by a Nazi from Svoboda. There is also a ministry of truth which keeps journalists under tight control. They also created “an internet army”, trolls claiming they are from Donbass which will be used for more war propaganda, and most likely in attempts to discredit the people of Donbass. Anyone can be fired, kidnapped, beaten, tortured, even killed if they are suspected of not being patriotic enough (that is, they don’t want to see “Moskali to knives”), or if they express doubts or opposition towards the civil war and the economic war against the population. Nazis hunt down “suspects”, arrest them en mass and deliver them to SBU (where they are tortured to admit their guilt) – 700 hundred men from Kharkov were arrested in a single day by the Ukrainian Gestapo for political reasons. Workers who demand their wages are “visited” by Ukrainian Gestapo and their union leaders are arrested. People who protest the irrespirable costs of life are attacked by Nazi gangs. 

It was only a matter of time before the Nazis take their war from the east of the country to the rest of Ukraine. Their enemies are the same: working people who refuse to submit to them; their supporters are the same: rich upper class and West-sponsored patriotic middle class – both in Ukraine AND in Russia. The “good guys” the West wants to put in power in Moscow have been at the Maidan in Kyiv, and relentlessly try to “maidanize” Russia too, Nazis from Russia are killing in east Ukraine as part of Nazi Azov state incorporated regiment (no, NATO has no problem with them, so they are not “Russian invasion”).  

West’s most hidden skeleton: its own enduring fascism 

The World War II was not a war against fascism – this becomes more than clear today, but it was also evident when Western powers helped Hitler and Mussolini crush the social revolution in Spain. World War II was one to “reboot” capitalism and fortify the war economy which is the heart of the American Empire.

The Cold War was not a clash between “freedom” and “totalitarianism”; USSR was an economy which kept the fundamentals of capitalism and of the class society. While the western propaganda was claiming moral leverage deploring the totalitarianism in Eastern Europe, the Western “democracies” were tolerating fascist dictatorships in Spain and Portugal and had no problems to resort to totalitarian means themselves. Today they have no shame to build police states at home, for total control of their populations and to repress any meaningful social struggles, which will happen no matter how totalitarian and repressive these states will become. 

The Cold War was a stand-off between two major blocks of power because Russia and Eastern Europe stepped outside of western control. They were no longer the third world the west needed to provide them with cheap slaves and unlimited access to their resources.

Neo-liberalism, the global phase of capitalism, which was forced upon Chile at first and later imported all over Western world, was the twin brother of “the crusade for freedom” against the Soviet Union (Reagan’s “Satan”) and Eastern Europe. In the West neo-liberalism is meant to totally subjugate the working class; in the east it is aimed at creating the west’s third world: poor countries are left to crawl and have to provide the west with land, cheap workers and markets for their exports, and agree to create the mechanisms through which the west can exert total control over these societies, and also accept artificial debts whenever US or Brussels say so. Colonies is the right word. 

Neocon William Kristol: “American power should be used not just in the defense of American interests but for the promotion of American principles.”

United States’ debt: $18,137,739,636,332.88 as of February 27, 2015 

Russia is the largest gas exporter and the 2nd oil exporter after Saudi Arabia. Some estimate that the value of its natural resources exceed $200 trillion.In 2007, Russia’s foreign exchange reserves reached $476.4 billion USD, more than the entire Euro zone. 

Want to be my colony?” 

The never reported information by the western media are exactly those related to the way the West has colonized Eastern Europe, how they destroyed communities, how they killed people, how they pushed kids to suicide because their parents had to slave for the west. You don’t read in the western media how their brutal privatization – so praised by economists – has in particular destroyed any chance of local workers unionizing. You don’t read about how countries in Eastern Europe are turned into colonies just like those in Latin America were, which did not happen to them until the western conquistadors descended upon them. (13)

Workers are constantly attacked; after the industry was destroyed on purpose, now public services are ever more denied to local population; and for the sake of appearances they are “replaced” with NGOs which are west’s arms of control in case local population or the local governments “get out of control” or piss off the gods in the west. This is clear as the sky in Ukraine now, and this is what they want in Russia too when they demand “a Russia which works in our interests.” (U.S.’s Victoria Nuland) 

Victoria Nuland: “That’s the Russia that is in our interest, is a Russia that is strong, that is democratic, that lives up to its international obligations, that is a good partner for us.” 

You don’t read in the western media how people in Eastern Europe are forced to pay prices which sometimes are higher than in the West, while their incomes are 10-20 times smaller than those in the West. You don’t read how IMF forces starvation wages on doctors and teachers from Eastern Europe so they can emigrate to the West, or commit suicide. If you read this in the western media, you’d understand why people in Russia will not allow it back, irrespective of what Putin wants.

At the same time, as compensation, the West encourages these societies to step even worse into integral nationalism – a form of fascism – , because such societies are easily militarized and always ready for wars.

What the Western (European and American) politicians call “Ukraine’s independence” actually means colonization; they do it exposing their same old conquistador mentality and in the same ways they always used in third world countries. When they say they want “open societies”, they actually mean, as Chomsky explained over and over again, (11) “in our peculiar sense of this term—that is, a society that remains open to American economic penetration or political control.” Carl Bildt confirmed that it is so in a public speech in 1992, when he said that it’s not “enough” if former Soviet countries become “liberal democracies” if they are not under the control of the West (12)

Russia’s vicinity is a good excuse to blur this reality created by the West in Ukraine, but people who live in Ukraine already know it: their wages dropped 2 thirds in less than a year, and the costs of life skyrocketed to the levels similar to those in the rich Western Europe. The Nazi morons who contributed to this make fun of them now. Ukraine has lost 2.5 million people in less than one year.

You remember how each time IMF said they went “a little too far”, like they could be for real surprised at how much they steal? Have no worries: they are too happy to repeat their “mistakes” (social crimes and economic terrorism) now in Ukraine.

Capitalist propaganda in Eastern Europe can still demonize the post WWII-past, when Soviet Union exerted control over their economies, but also allowed them space to develop their industry and cover their necessities of education, research and development; even if the political parties who ruled these countries were dumb.

What strangled Eastern Europe was not necessarily its past economic model – which was not communism, but state capitalism – but rather the austerity which came together with IMF loans in the ‘80s. In some countries, this austerity was horribly brutal and paved the way for western take over, even if bloodshed was still needed to legitimize the regime change, and feed the credibility of the transition to market economy and of the economic tortures, which followed, by relentlessly demonizing the past regimes. This “transition” actually meant a relentless “austerity”, which should be called forced impoverishment of working people by depriving them of resources and the rights they had under “communism”. The transition actually meant the changes in the ruling classes with individuals whose role was to serve the interests of the West and force the bills on local populations. It’s hilarious to hear today Western politicians speak about “corruption” when they were those who legitimized and participated together with the local ruling class into robberies of entire factories, towns and resources, and in the plundering of public budgets.

In the industrial eastern Ukraine such robberies were so total – they formed the oligarchs – that the working class actually was the least corrupted by private property in the entire Eastern Europe. Here lays one of the most important sources of the civil war in Ukraine. 

“Orwell on Fighting Fascists: From the Spanish Civil War to Ukraine”, by Vladimir Golstein:

On the one hand, there are “progressives” who take the side of Peoples Republics of Lugansk and Donetsk, with Russia providing the military support to the industrial East and paying the lip service to the concerns of its workers. Once again we have Western countries falling over backwards in their blatant anti-Russian propaganda, in their embrace of Orwellian doublespeak, in their implicit desire to squash the working class and its demands, while providing the full support of the bourgeois-fascist Kiev rulers and their Franco style politics. Various national, religious, and cultural issues complicate and obscure the underlying conflict that manifests itself in Ukraine, but I think we owe it to the genius of Orwell to see through these complications and recognize the hidden paradigm that is as relevant today as it was seventy years ago. We also owe it to Orwell to rise above the narrow “class” or political issues, and to fight for the truth, no matter where it takes us.” Read it all here, and also check this on the raising fascism in Ukraine

Russians saw this happen to them too – “the shock therapy” which should be called economic torture, actually – has killed or hastened the death of probably 20 million working people in Russia in the ‘90s – social crimes which were never admitted by the Western gurus of neo-liberalism, but which are very much alive in the memory of the people who live in Russia; just as the second World War is with perhaps the most brutal famine in the entire history imposed by the Nazis on a civilian population.

Wehrmacht soldier about Nazi Germany’ war against RussiaIf Russians ever paid back one half of what we have done, you won’t smile or sing again.”


St.Petersburg, people carry pictures of the Russian soldiers who perished in World War II.

A Russian soldier who fought in southern Russia: “I watched my mother and father die. I knew perfectly well that they were starving. But I wanted their bread more than I wanted them to stay alive. And they knew that. That’s what I remember about the blockade (of Leningrad): that feeling that you wanted your parents to die because you wanted their bread.”

The way Western “crats” claim Russians would actually desire again to be subjected to the same economic terrorism could stir laughter, but it is actually frightening since it exposes so tragically the utter arrogance of “the empire of good”.

In the past 25 years, the societies in Eastern Europe were brutally hit by the faccia of western colonization. The human damage was kept hidden by the fact that the economic war against the voiceless and powerless populations was enforced gradually, and that the propaganda, guilt and inferiority complexes were so carefully fabricated and went hand in hand with the destruction of any possibility of resistance, that the intensity of atrocities was kept low, or where they served complementary interests of the West, they were deliberately translated to ethnic conflicts – Balkan wars – , followed by NATO’s “peaceful” bombs, of course. In Eastern Ukraine, due to the internal historical conditions, the resistance against the West was immediate: war, airstrikes, bombs, torture, rape, beheadings, terror, atrocities and mass slaughter followed to such a scale that it could be said that United States have turned Ukraine into their Latin America colony. 

However, the crisis the West provoked in Ukraine confirms the real nature of the Cold War; which was not a clash between ideologies, as the propaganda claimed – “freedom against totalitarianism” -; but rather a standoff between the two blocks of power caused by the fact that after the World War II, the West was denied unrestricted access to Eastern Europe resources. This has been proved by the quarter of century after the wall between the east and west fell and the west assumed the role of “winner”. This, they assumed, was a right in itself to take back Eastern Europe, in what they call “integration” but what in reality is a colonization so total that cannot be compared with the control the USSR exerted over the economies under its sphere of influence.

It’s an ugly truth, which the west simply does not want to face, since they could not care less about the devastation they caused in Eastern Europe and in the Balkans. They call this “creative destruction” “to create markets”, which is actually capitalist accumulation for the rich scum in the West.

The Russian revolution was derailed from its path towards a libertarian society and democratic economic arrangements; but nobody can deny the material progress it brought to the societies in Russia and Eastern Europe, which in those times, were the medieval villages of Europe or to be more accurate, Western Europe’s third world. It’s relevant that the Nazis in Ukraine take down all the statues of Lenin, while they accuse Putin of being “a Stalinist”, but not a Leninst. It’s relevant they hate women in the west for the rights they still have; Lenin granted working class women rights they did not have at that time in the West.

These might seem details, but they are important if anyone wants to understand the reasons of the hatred towards Russia and east Ukraine: it’s not just against Russia but against the ideological legacy of Russia which still lives in east Ukraine. It’s not relevant for them that Putin is not Communist, sadly he’s a conservative and a capitalist. However it must be scary for Western leaders to hear Putin talk at home so relaxed about what the Russian Revolution was really meant to be and what it was not; it must be horrible to hear a politician today speak publicly about workers’ rights to control their lives and to control production, and admit that the Bolsheviks denied them that.

This civil war in Eastern Ukraine also bears in itself the attempts by Western governments to stage a coup or a regime change in Russia so they can place their “good guys” in power, like they did in Kyiv, and as a matter of fact, like they have also done in the rest of Eastern Europe and the Balkans. While Russia made clear that it cannot allow Ukraine to slaughter the population of East Ukraine – which was the intention of the Nazis who got to control political decision in Kyiv to a large extent after the coup in Kyiv on February 22, 2014 –; certain separatists, in certain key moments in the conflict, acted in ways which helped Western propaganda make credible their casus belli for a war with Russia.

Whose separatists?

The dynamic of the separatist leaders in east Ukraine could be an expression of the ways Moscow responded to the West’s attempts to trap it in Eastern Ukraine and “reward” it with a coup or all-out war; the second possibility has not evaded yet the minds of the war mongering, totalitarian, lying McCains in Washington and their pathetic, blood-thirsty NATO generals (just so they have no doubt: these are insults). The conflicts between the separatist leaders could also be an expression of the fights within the ruling classes in Russia, and they could reveal the traces left behind by the west in their attempts to carve their way into the Kremlin. The way western media favored Dugin – who is a fascist and a clown – so he could be attached to the image the west fabricated for their “demon” country has raised some eyebrows especially after this guy did all he could to make credible West’s accusations against Moscow.

Russia is certainly standing up to western hegemony, but the way Dugin managed to fool so many into presenting this like some biblical project of Putin responds to prejudices towards Russia which are dominant in the west and especially in Eastern Europe, where patriotism is identified with death wishes for Russia. 

These prejudices come to light especially when Russia refuses to be worse than Western “democracies”, and they reveal a brutal racism, which seems to be a reflex in the West and which is always present in the Western mentality. Whenever Russians piss off western leaders by proving them wrong, the media in the west calls it “defiance” (oh, you gods!).

However, Dugin has not been seen “playing chess” with Putin, but with Obama’s adviser, the same one who told the Mujahedeens in Afghanistan that “god is with them” and the same one who said he’d help create Al Qaeda again because destroying USSR, now Russia, is “worth it”.


Dugin and Brezinsky, old “chess” buddies.

 His name is Zbigniew Brezinsky and he is a sick war monger and a creator of terrorists.

Dugin was close to a separatist leader who formed “the Russian Orthodox Army” (some 500 fighters) just when the Nazi crusader who is the boss of SBU (Ukrainian Gestapo) needed to claim that they are fighting in the east orthodox “Jihadists” and “orthodox fundamentalism”; when in fact the religious terrorists – the knights, as neo-Nazi Yarosh calls them – are exactly those on his side (almost 100 churches Orthodox have been bombed on purpose by Ukrainian death squads (media calls them para-military “volunteer battalions”) and by the Ukrainian army in east Ukraine. This was also the separatist SBU recorded as claiming he had shut down MH17. He has pushed back for months the Ukrainian army from occupying Slavyansk. He also participated in the wars in the Balkans where he was accused of war crimes. Igor Strelkov constantly urged Russia to attack Ukraine, claiming it’s the only way it can stop an all-out war by the west. He even lied that they started the civil war, when Kyiv forced this was upon the east gradually – first were sent in the snipers who killed at random children, mothers, old people, people in balconies, shot at cars, at houses, then Kyiv’s tanks, grads, ballistic missiles, incendiary bombs, cluster bombs, and war planes terrorized and slaughtered en mass the local population. He actually dismissed the resistance of the local population in the east, which was a reality before anyone heard about him. Dugin also helped Kyiv discredit the Russian media by inventing stories about atrocities, when there was no need to invent anything since the reality of the civil war was totally graphic.

Russia is accused that it helps and arms the rebels – even though the accusers have provided no proof, probably such help was provided, but NAF (the rebel troops) got most of their weapons from the Ukrainian army, they either bought them or confiscated them in battle. What the accusers don’t mention, however, is that in the east is located most of the military industry of Ukraine; so the rebels had ways to provide the tanks. These rebels are also working people and they know how to repair them or make them work.

The war propaganda against Russia intensified after August 2014 when Russia downplayed certain separatists’ games in east Ukraine.

Since then, there were relentless attempts to set up Maidans in Moscow – all failed. There are attempts to fabricate them in Siberia, too. In December and in January there were attacks by Chechen insurgents in Grozny, which were repelled by Russian army. Several weeks later, the Chechen leader who participated on the side of Kyiv in the war against east Ukraine was killed; his death was deplored by US sponsored media and think-tank analysts who even expressed their concern that “volunteers” (terrorists, to be more exact) would have a difficult time to get to Ukraine.  

girkin russian nazis donbass ulcer

This one is now an “ex-terrorist” for Kyiv’s propaganda, he constantly urged Russia to attack Ukraine, just like Dugin did. This interview is posted by the Russian Nazis who are fighting in Azov against the people in Donbass and against Moscow.

West’s attempts at regime change in Russia failed in the moment they started their economic war against Russia, expressed by sanctions. Nuland openly admitted the aim of these sanctions was not necessarily Ukraine, but the manipulation of the population of Russia, which she hoped could turn against the Kremlin and pave the way for a coup in Russia (notice how they joke about the Nazis in Ukraine and how Nuland is pissed off that her cookies at the maidan were presented as such and not as sandwiches – this is “Russian propaganda” she claims; she obviously misses the point here: cookies are Marie Antoinette‘s “let them eat cake” which entered Europeans historical memory).

West’s Saudis also politically manipulated oil prices (such “free markets”, indeed) to deprive Russia of incomes; but it seems that Moscow used it against them – it bought for the state cheap shares in oil companies, thus increasing their control over them. (14)

Nuland said they want Russia to be “in their interest”. She even said they won’t be “Napoleon” (the subtext refers to waging war against Russia in winter conditions); she should have said Hitler, really, since they supported Nazis in Ukraine to do their dirty job, just like Hitler (Germany and UK also supported on purpose the fascists of OUN even in the ‘20s, so they can use them against Russia, even after the League of Nations declared them “terrorists” in 1926; Bandera was an agent of the German secret service and of Britain).


Russian nazi, one of the allies of Kyiv.


This was a conference in Washington openly instigating overthrowing the Russian government. It’s funny how it’s written like US foreign policy would be some leftist promoter of anti-capitalism (LOL) and not a conservative entity, supporting fascist dictatorships every chance they get.


“Open Russia” leader at the maidan in Kyiv.


Flags of Nazis from Russia and Ukraine in Moscow.

euromaidan khodorkovsky putin revo 1917

This is simply epic from the Nazi propagandists of Euromaidan; what they basically say is that they supported the Russian revolution and appreciate Lenin; while at home they took down some 400 statues of Lenin – who helped create their state.


Anders Protests moscow 30 dec putin hulio

This is one of Kyiv’s propagandists; he also called people in Russia “slaves” for not pleasing him, and for refusing to play the music Washington expected from them. That’s actually the opposite of slave, but western propagandists are not particularly people who think, they just like to repeat “dick” over and over again.


United States also passed several laws through which they assumed their “right” to repel “the Russian aggression against Ukraine” (which was denied by the commander of Ukrainian army, who said there are no Russian state troops in Ukraine, contradicting NATO). They even said nothing could stop them to send weapons (troops actually) to Ukraine, even if NATO refused. “Weapons” means in fact stocking foreign troops on the territory of Ukraine. This they had done ever since the civil war started, and continue to do so, now.

Andrey Parubyi, a long-term Nazi from UNA-UNSO, the coordinator of the Nazi shooters during the maidan – and later “the investigator” of the bloodshed on February 20th –, the organizer of the Odessa massacre of May 2, 2014– , visited Nuland and McCain, a year after the maidan, to ask for more weapons (and troops) and most likely did not come back empty handed. He is what the West used to call “freedom fighters” during the Cold War. They were and are Nazis.


U.S.’s Nuland and the one of the organizers of the coup d’etat in 2014 in Kyiv, the founder of a Nazi party in 1991, which changed its appearances but not its ideology. They talked guns.

parubyi + igor mazur UNA UNSO

The organizer of the Kyiv coup, the massacre in Odessa and one of the promoters of the civil war in Ukraine together with his old nazi buddy from UNA-UNSO.


This photograph which is taken from the page of one of Parubyi’s long term Nazi friends, Igor Mazur, shows the continuity of UPA and OUN and their fascism. The old man in the picture is the nephew of one of the founders of UPA.


When you want civil war in your country, you know who’s the guy to talk to in US Congress. 


Poroshenko after getting weapons, probably from US, via UAE. Three happy killers of children.


ISIS are such an inspiration for the nazis in Ukraine; the orange shirt says “Moskali”.

azov PR grozny the end of Russia celebrate

Also remember this is Azov’s PR boy.


Party of God, the Catholic version: UNA-UNSO.



This has been photographed in the Ukrainian parliament, which was previously blessed by priests so that “the evil demons of communism may be chased away” (the devil invoked as state policy). The cartoon praises the Ukrainian military crushing and destroying east Ukraine; it’s an admission of the reason they are waging this civil war against eastern Ukraine. “Western values” in all their splendor.


Kids going to school in military uniforms.


Kid from eastern Ukraine who lost her friends in the civil war.


Nazi UPA during one of their ceremonies, flags of Waffen SS and swastikas are placed next to a Catholic cross, signifying their belief in their crusade-like wars.

upa then now

They think this is cool.

14th Waf­fen SS Divi­sion (“Galicia”)–composed of Ukrain­ian personnel–being inspected by Hein­rich Himmler

Hein­rich Himmler inspecting Ukrainians from UPA as part of 14th Waf­fen SS Galicia Divi­sion.

ukr nazis vanquish Invaders

shkil_una_unso_shrine SS Galizien Galicia

A. Shkil one of the sickest Nazis in Ukraine, and one of the most important ideologues of UNA-UNSO at a shrine for Waffen SS Galizien Galicia in Western Ukraine in the ’90s.

US support of violent neo-Nazis in Ukraine׃ Video Compilation.mp4_snapshot_00.14.07_[2015.02.28_19.03.47]

Nazi from Lviv, trained and supported by UNA-UNSO.


Ukrainians in UPA as part of SS Galicia.

bbc propaganda rs invades ukr


This is one of the most epic failures in western media propaganda about “where do you see Nazis in Ukraine”; the swastikas behind him are the signatures the Nazis left on the Russian Embassy in July when they attacked it in retaliation for rebels taking down one of their war helicopters.


Nazi from Azov carrying the same old SS symbols on his uniform today.


UPA and OUN Nazis during 1943.

la glaive et la crois ukr nazis

Ukrainian Nazis’ credo: “The sword and the cross”, similar to religious mercenaries from the middle ages.ca0b9aa1f484efa01e7fd593c06156f0


Doctors, nurses and patients were killed in Kyiv’s bombings of hospitals in eastern Ukraine; this photo was taken during one of the many bombardments of the hospital in Donetsk by the Ukrainian army.


School in Donetsk bombed by Ukrainian army.


Kramatorsk, unarmed locals stop armed Ukrainian solder from invading their city, April 16, 2014, photo Reuters.


Hotel Europa turned into a humanitarian center bombed by Ukrainian army while people were waiting in line to receive aid so they can survive.


Ukrop president Peter Poroshenko, proving how “cool” it is for him to slaughter civilian population.


Ukrop president went to Paris to put on a compassionate face for the victims of January attacks; while in his country Nazi battalions invaded again the home of local women to rob them and while they resisted, they shot them dead.


This man was kidnapped from the street by the Ukrainian Nazis for absolutely no reason; was taken to SBU and tortured to death.

resident of debalcevo swears at ukr military

Unarmed woman from Debalcevo swears at armed Ukrainian solider, accusing him of bombing and terrorizing them.

donetsk july 1

Donetsk July 1st, 2014.

22 gorlovka feb 4_4B7UXFzNCIAEm6K6 B8h6ml7IgAARMdU B9VcJI1CMAErG2U

donetsk aug 15 1

Donetsk, Ukrainian army bombing the city at night, August 15 2014.

donbass uragan cooker

Kid from Donbass uses the remains of an Uragan rocket which his parents improvised into a cooker.

donetsk sergei ilnitsky

Donetsk, photo by Sergei Ilnitsky.


Lugansk people living without electricity after Ukrainian army repeatedly bombed the power plants. Maybe hundreds of workers were killed in eastern Ukraine by Nazi snipers when they exposed themselves to repair the utilities which were bombed the next day by the brave Ukrainian army.


Ukrop president recognizing Ukraine’s state terrorism:

People wait to be rescued on an upper storey ledge during a fire at the trade union building in Odessa

The massacre in Odessa on May 2, 2014 marked the start of Ukraine’s state terrorism, fascist repression and civil war against eastern Ukraine.


azov mariupol orange armbands

Funeral of one UNA-UNSO from Belarus, killed at the maidan, mid January 2014.

poroshenko medal neonazi belarus


This scum is another hero in Ukraine today. He is UNA-UNSO which, under the guidance of Parubyi, organized and committed the massacre at Odessa on May 2, 2014, which marked the start of the state terrorism against eastern Ukraine and took place in the same day when the government from Kyiv send battalions of Nazis and state soldiers to invade, crush and occupy the villages and cities in the east of the country. Until then, the inhabitants were sporadically gunned down by snipers; several people every day. Then the government sent Grads so they can kill them in tens and hundreds.


This is the Ukrop president of Ukraine.

ukrops forcing prisoner to kiss flag

bruce springnote slavyansk painting banks got the message

This was posted by Mykola Lebed’s nephew who commanded a death nazi squad battalion in eastern Ukraine; he was killed in August and so praised by western media. Lebed was part of Bandera’s OUN gang, he ran their Gestapo sector. He was a nazi war criminal protected by the United States government. (See separate blog detailing how he had fun in Ukraine torturing Jews).

Ukrainian prime-minister crying and demanding weapons from the United States: We fight for our freedoms and for our independence” 


Nazis on the stage at the maidan, during the fascist coup a year ago.


Nazis doing the Hitler salute while invading eastern Ukraine.

junta will come 2

How Nazis in Ukraine present themselves, notice the symbol of Mussolini’s fascism. This is from one of their pages.


Following the “logic” of today’s western media, they will soon claim that these were not Nazis either.

fifa azov documentary 6

Nazis from Azov during one of the massacres in Mariupol; they also bombed this city in the winter to discredit the rebels because they knew they are deeply hated in the city they keep under occupation.


Nazis advertising the reason for civil war in Eastern Ukraine. What makes it “cool” for them.


(1) President of Ukraine still lies there is “no civil war” in Ukraine. The forced war mobilization is illegal, because the war is not recognized by the state of Ukraine; instead it’s called “anti-terrorism” operation (millions of people are considered combatants and are treated as such, they are to be crushed by death squads and terror for political reasons, actually, Nazis even admitted this).

(2) Kyiv state officials do not even hide any longer that their death squads are Nazis. Kyiv needs “the Russian invasion” to justify their Nazis who are terrorizing not just the war torn east Ukraine, but the rest of the country too. This Ukrainian ambassador claims that the tanks and war planes Kyiv has sent against the civilian population of east Ukraine, in April-May 2014, meant, of course, “Russia attacked us” since it’s just logic that Moscow can send tanks from Kyiv to slaughter 50,000 people (most of them Russian speaking) in east Ukraine, and bomb them day and night for 10 months, with impunity.

This ambassador confirms the fact that Ukrainian army at first refused to slaughter civilians in east Ukraine (this is in fact what Kyiv means by “Russia attacked us”). The state army were subjected to tests and the soldiers who said they cannot kill women and children were fired. This is what the ambassador means by “we had no army”; confirming their war in east Ukraine is indeed one of extermination. They also passed a law giving officers permission to execute on the spot the soldiers who do not fully obey them (for instance if they refuse to fire on houses and people on the streets, schools or hospitals, or kids at playgrounds; many paramilitary and officers went to east Ukraine to plunder; locals were also tortured and thousands of women and girls were raped, some even beheaded afterward). When the Ukrainian ambassador says their Nazi death squads do not do “anything outside the control of Kyiv”, that means the Ukrainian state actually subscribes to the war crimes committed by these Nazis in the east, which were superficially and just in part documented by “human rights organisations” (these organisations mostly act as part of war propaganda machine, but what the Nazis did was too much even for them). 
What this ambassador does not say is that it’s not them who control the nazis, it’s the other way around: the Nazis control the politicians in Kyiv, since, after Odessa May 2 massacre they have been gradually incorporated into state structures (at the pressures of NATO; this is actually what Hitler did with his death squads too) and now they have become so powerful within the state apparatus and the society of Ukraine that they actually set the rules. There is no far right party in the parliament, this ambassador claims, which is a lie; half of Rada’s MPs were elected independently of parties and lots of them are Nazis; their own prime-minister has accepted Azov’s Nazis in his political formation, and Azov’s leader is a member of parliament; such are UNA-UNSO’s Yarosh and many others. 
If anyone contests Bandera, or shows Kyiv is lying risks being arrested, jailed and many end up tortured by SBU, which has been turned into Ukraine’s Gestapo. Their prime-minister even called people who protested against the forced impoverishment “Russian agents”, which in Ukraine today is like issuing a death sentence. Video here: []

(3) The shootings at the maidan came from the side of the “peaceful protesters”; see separate blog detailing this. One relevant video here:

 (4) Noam Chomsky on the 500 year old Conquest, here:


(5) The Crusade for Freedom was an American propaganda campaign operating from 1950–1960. Its public goal was to raise funds for Radio Free Europe; it also served to conceal the CIA’s funding of Radio Free Europe and to generate domestic support for American Cold War policies.

(6) Ronald Reagan’s address to Members of the British Parliament; June 8, 1982. His speech competes with the Orwellian official language of the totalitarian systems in the east:
(7) Probably they did the same in other European countries, for which NATO have been suspected but never held accountable. These waves of terror in Europe are quite similar to the recent shootings from France and Czech Republic (countries which publicly expressed opposition to NATO’s war plans against Russia). See Nato’s secret armies, and a research on it demanding accountability.

(8) Silvia Federici, “Caliban and the Witch“, you may download it all from this link.

* quote from George Orwell, “Animal Farm”

(9) “Parallel states are common under totalitarian systems. “The Anatomy of Fascism” by Robert O. Paxton: “It may be that the earliest phenomenon that can be functionally related to fascism is American: the Ku Klux Klan. Just after the Civil War, some former Confederate officers, fearing the vote given to African Americans in 1867 by the Radical Reconstructionists, set up a militia to restore an overturned social order. The Klan constituted an alternate civic authority, parallel to the legal state, which, in the eyes of the Klan’s founders, no longer defended their community’s legitimate interests. By adopting a uniform (white robe and hood), as well as by their techniques of intimidation and their conviction that violence was justified in the cause of their group’s destiny,88 the first version of the Klan in the defeated American South was arguably a remarkable preview of the way fascist movements were to function in interwar Europe.”

US funded journalists in Ukraine: “How volunteers created a parallel state“:
“There exist dozens, if not hundreds, of other organizations that perform various charity functions as a result of the current Russian invasion. Like the volunteer battalions, these organizations fill in the role that the state has been unable to.”

(10) George Soros in Munich, read here more.

(11) He may mock the Russian TVs reporting on the Ukrainian Nazis (that still does not mean the Nazis are not there, even if he white washes them like this paper constantly did), but he never once questioned his own government who adopted their grandfathers and uncles who committed pogroms and exterminated civilian populations in the Nazis’ killing fields of Eastern Europe. Why he does not is something not even his psychiatrist could tell. But you see, living in Russia causes you life-long childhood trauma. It’s better to live in the US where you can be simply executed by police on the streets for being black or jailed to rot in some private prison if you’re black. Also, he confronts what he sees on TV with his own “reality”; where TVs in the US are not seen as war and capitalist propaganda, but as “war for civilization.” Imperialists are incredibly pathetic.
(12) Noam Chomsky: “Recent history shows that it makes little difference to us what form of government a country has so long as it remains an “open society,” in our peculiar sense of this term—that is, a society that remains open to American economic penetration or political control. If it is necessary to approach genocide in Vietnam to achieve this objective, than this is the price we must pay in defense of freedom and the rights of man.”

(13) Carl Bildt (who was never held accountable for his involvement in the civil war in Darfur who benefited oil corporations in Sweden) in 1992 talking about the “New World Order“: “If we succeed in that (liberal democracies and properous economies…), I mean they primarily with our help, that’s not enough, then we must have local cooperation for free trade arangements that includes everyone… the rule of the law not only in those countries, but also the rule of the law in international relations.” (translation: liberal democracies and prosperous economies = capitalist total dictatorship, the unbrindled enrichment of the ruling class and the strangling of the working class; rule of the law in international relations: their corporations get unrestricted access to any resource they want, when they want and nobody is to make a fuss about it.)


(14) “Detering Democracy“: “It is often not appreciated how profound and deeply rooted is the contempt for democracy in the elite culture, and the fear it arouses.” “Former UN Ambassador Daniel Moynihan in his memoir of his years at the United Nations, where he describes frankly his role as Indonesia invaded East Timor in December 1975:
“… within a few weeks some 60,000 people had been killed, “10 percent of the population, almost the proportion of casualties experienced by the Soviet Union during the Second World War.”
“The United states wished things to turn out as they did, and worked to bring this about. The Department of State desired that the United Nations prove utterly ineffective in whatever measures it undertook. This task was given to me, and I carried it forward with no inconsiderable success.”
Sponsorship of state-guided international terrorism and economic management designed for short-term gain for the wealthy are the most notable features of the Reagan era, but there are others. In this brief review, I have not even mentioned what may be the most dangerous legacy of Reagan, Thatcher, and the rest. Coming generations are going to face problems that are quite different in scale and complexity from any that have arisen before. The possible destruction of a physical environment that can sustain human life in anything Like its present mode is one of the most dramatic of these, along with the proliferating threat of weapons of mass destruction and continuing conflicts among adversaries with increasing capacity to cause terrible damage. That these problems have a solution is not so obvious. That exaltation of greed to the highest human value is not the answer is quite obvious. Tales about private vices yielding public benefits could be tolerated in a world Living less close to the margin, but surely can no longer. By celebrating the ugliest elements of human nature and social life, the Reaganites have set back, by some uncertain measure, the prospects for coming to terms with grave dilemmas and possible catastrophes.
Coming generations will pay the costs. That is the legacy of these years even if we permit ourselves not to see the misery and torture of our victims throughout much of the world.
Short of a real counterrevolution, reversing many social and political gains of the past and imposing novel repressive patterns, the United States cannot adopt these forms of authoritarian state-corporate rule.
The Soviet hobgoblin has served admirably for the domestic and international designs of US elites, who are far from overjoyed to see it fade from view.
Eastern Europeans are, “in a way, luckier than Central Americans,” Godoy wrote: “while the Moscow-imposed government in Prague would degrade and humiliate reformers, the Washington-made government in Guatemala would kill them. It still does, in a virtual genocide that has taken more than 150,000 victims . . . [in what Amnesty International calls] a ‘government program of political murder’.” That, he suggested, is “the main explanation ‘ for the fearless character of the students’ recent uprising in Prague: the Czechoslovak Army doesn’t shoot to kill…. In Guatemala, not to mention El Salvador, random terror is used to keep unions and peasant associations from seeking their own way”-and to ensure that the press conforms or disappears, so that Western liberals need not fret over censorship in the “fledgling democracies” they applaud. There is an “important difference in the nature of the armies and of their foreign tutors. ” In the Soviet satellites, the armies are “apolitical and obedient to their national government,” while in the US satellites, “the army is the power,” doing what they have been trained to do for many decades by their foreign tutor. “One is tempted to believe that some people in the White House worship Aztec gods-with the offering of Central American blood.” They backed forces in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua that “can easily compete against Nicolae Ceausescu’s Securitate for the World Cruelty Prize.”
Godoy quotes a European diplomat who says, “as long as the Americans don’t change their attitude towards the region, there’s no space here for the truth or for hope.” Surely no space for nonviolence and love.
One will search far to find such truisms in US commentary, or the West in general, which much prefers largely meaningless (though self-flattering) comparisons between Eastern and Western Europe. Nor is the hideous catastrophe of capitalism in the past years a major theme of contemporary discourse-a catastrophe that is dramatic in Latin America and other domains of the industrial West, in the “internal Third World” of the United States, and the “exported slums” of Europe. Nor are we likely to find much attention to the fact, hard to ignore, that the economic success stories typically involve coordination of the state and financial-industrial conglomerates, another sign of the collapse of capitalism in the past sixty years. It is only the Third World that is to be subjected to the destructive forces of free market capitalism, so that it can be more efficiently robbed and exploited by the powerful.”
National Security State and Fascism“: “Because the National Security State is U.S.-sponsored and supported and meets U.S. criteria on the fundamentals, there is another important international consequence: the mass media in the United States play down and essentially suppress the evidence of the enormous inhumanities and institutionalized violence of these U.S. satellites. The trial of a single Soviet dissident, Anatol Shcharansky, received more newspaper space in 1978 than the several thousand official murders in Latin America during the same year, not to speak of the vast number of lesser events such as tortures and massive dispossession. Information on Latin American horrors is readily available from church and other sources eager to tell the ghastly story, but-to put the matter baldly-the sponsors of class warfare under subfascism are hardly eager to focus attention on its victims. Just as in the case of warfare in Vietnam, both killing and ruthless exploitation at a distance are best done by proxy or through impersonal machinery, with eyes averted. The Free World establishment wisely chooses to focus on movements of the “gross national product” of Brazil, without too much attention to who gets what and how. The Free World media also concentrate on “terror,” defined as we have seen so as to exclude official violence by definition; and the media allow the world of subfascism to be viewed largely through the eyes of the torturers and U.S. officials and businessmen. U.S. power and interest have put a communications lid on the fate of the great majority of the population of Latin America under U.S.-sponsored subfascism. Thus the churches fight a lonely battle as the last institutional protection of the mass of the population, with the primary enemy an absentee ownership interest supported by a super-power. In Latin America it is widely recognized that the origin and preservation of the National Security State rests on U.S. support. It is the ultimate Orwellism that this same superpower is thought in the West to be fighting a noble battle for “human rights.”

 (15) It’s interesting how part of Western propaganda intends to link Russia to the creation of ISIS, after Russia sent Iraq planes to bomb them. In fact, these 100,000 paid mercenaries, terrorists, and fascists are also recruited from the West and financed from the United States, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and most likely others with rich bank accounts who are never under public scrutiny, occasionally helped by Turkey. The way they employ terror as counter-insurgency is so striking similar to what western death squads did in the countries that were to be colonized (these death squads used Nazis from WWII protected by the west and the same tactics SS used in Eastern Europe): they behead and burn people publicly, they rape and take women and girls in slavery, they take pleasure in slaughtering people.
They destroy the Middle East in ways the medieval crusaders could not do it, and in ways which that reveal something more than hatred: envy. Such systematic destruction of local history and ancient culture on such scale was employed by Talibans in Afghanistan and by the army of the United States in Iraq.
In the West, they are used by fascists and nazis in fueling Islamophobia, which is actually a cover for the state-enforced policies against refugees and immigrants.
Most likely, they are also the guns of the scramble for Middle East oil resources.
It’s also interesting that Murdoch’s Vice, which supported the Nazis in Ukraine, were not at risk to be kidnapped by ISIS when they embedded with them and filmed with them.


Ukrainian Army Continue Massacre, Shelling a Park, Houses – Behind Ukraine’s Walls of Fire (VII)

Horlikova, east Ukraine, July 27: 13 people have been confirmed killed by GRAD shelling by the Ukrainian government; later 4 more people were confirmed dead. Among them a 1 year old and a 5 year old. These photos have been taken in the central park of this town which is located some 20 km away from Donetsk. In this picture are Kristina and her 1 year old child. The photo below shows them alive in the same park they were murdered.


10527454_485228284913713_5773150706833882420_n Another person killed by government shelling, while walking in the park.

Ukrainian government’s forces (army and national guard, which incorporate also neo-nazi Right Sector and far right battalions) have committed another massacre, as they approach Donetsk, where 1 million people live. They shelled the city of Horlikova with Grads (multiple rocket launchers which they are not allowed to use under international law) and massacred 13 residents (updated to 17 residents) in the city, among which 2 children (1 year and 5 years old). They intentionally shelled the center of the city: blocs of flats and a park. Dozens are injured.

WARNING *** video of this massacre is very graphic:

As usual, Kyiv government propaganda claims that people shelled themselves, and denied responsibility, which seems to be their standard procedure. Ukrainian leaders of the supposed ”Anti-terrorist operation” claimed that ”criminals are firing indiscriminately upon civilians to recruit more fighters to their cause, and to discredit the Ukrainian government.”  That would mean that these people shelled their own families. Kyiv accuses them again of killing their own children; it’s typical of their own mind-set. Kyiv said the same thing about the villages they shelled, about their airstrikes against residents in eastern cities, starting with the massacre in Odessa.

Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото) School shelled in Donetsk; as you can see the flag in the class is Ukraine’s, not Russia’s.

1406254094_035_13166_donbassx 1406254094_037_20343_donbassz

After Slavyansk was captured by government forces, 5,000 people gathered in the center of Donetsk to show support for the rebels.


UNHCR said the war in Eastern Ukraine has caused 230,000 refugees: almost 100,000 people had fled Ukraine’s conflict zones for other regions within the country, and about 130,000 had crossed the eastern border into Russia.

10471249_609753282475116_7729896134316603752_n 5 people were killed when on July 29 they shelled a retirement house in Lugansk, many injured.Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото) These people are called “terrorists” by Kyiv.

Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото)

Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото)


1406254094_057_27626_donbasti When not bombed, residents in the east are left without means to provide for their needs.


Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото)

Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото)

Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото)

Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото)

Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото)

Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото)

Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото) These photos have been taken in eastern Ukraine over the past two months.


Weaponry used by the Ukrainian government against civilians in the east of Ukraine.


On July 26, Donetsk was shelled with Grads again; these attacks are almost daily in eastern Ukraine.

ukraine modernized grad Ukrainian multiple rocket launcher.

In Lugansk, the government killed almost 300 people in less than a month. Like they did in Slavyansk, they treat the entire population as ”insurgents”, because they know most rebels are local residents. They bomb hospitals, schools, workplaces, cut water, food and electricity. 60 percent of Lugansk is without electricity now.

1405009869_841494_8 OSCE warned that 4 million people in eastern Ukraine could remain without water; government forces cut water supplies for civilian population as a military strategy. This photo was taken in Slavyansk before being “liberated” by the Kyiv forces. The city resisted without water for months. Lugansk, July 22, after the shelling by the Kyiv forces.

The video below, translated in English – very graphic – has captured one of the massacres, the shelling of civilians on July 18.

This is how Grad kills:

Ukraine’s president has used the shooting down of a civilian aircraft in Eastern Ukraine to demand NATO’s involvement: “our 9/11” he called it on CNN. The U.S. have sent “military aides” to the crash site, and provided Ukraine with $33 million for the war in the east. Western mainstream media propaganda about Russia’s support for the rebels in the east of Ukraine has reached new lows in war mongering. They never mention that the neo-nazis in Ukraine are in fact a serious threat to the population of Western Ukraine, not to mention the ruling politicians; and Europe. This is the Ukrainian president visiting the front lines:









This report does not say why these people fight Kyiv, but sheds a different light on them than that of Kyiv’s propaganda:

<<“You need to ask the Ukrainians — who are you fighting? The women and children they bomb in their houses, the people whose electricity and water they turn off and try to starve. These Ukrainians fight with their NATO weapons and they accuse us of being Russian — well I’ve only been there once in my life. This is not Russia’s fault. I do hope this cause ends and we can get back to a normal life.”

032799-bb00553e-138f-11e4-ae81-95568c4ed36e Source

At the moment they wait, smoke cigarettes, play cards and wait. They know the Ukrainian troops are coming, the shelling is getting closer, but they say they are prepared. Irina, 27, had just completed a degree in psychology. There is no work so last week she decided to wear military green garb. When asked is she is ready to fight and die, the pretty new recruit smiles coyly.

“Of course, this is my home,” she said.>>

032396-cb132424-138f-11e4-ae81-95568c4ed36e Rebels in Donetsk, source

Here is a glimpse into how they saw it all; end of April, BBC: “You want to be in Europe? Go ahead. Whether we want to be with Russia or on our own that is our business. No one has a right to force us into this with the help of special services or foundations. This is a conscious effort to destroy Ukraine. Do you understand? We understand it all.” Eastern Russians: “We should not split, we should talk.” “We never thought that such a thing could happen between Ukrainians and Russians here.” Eastern Russian protestors: “They call us terrorists. Do you see terrorists?” “At least if they give us autonomy, I’d agree with that. But Russia… I don’t think Putin wants us.” This family made their mind to join Russia after they saw what was happening in Western Ukraine,” the reporter says. “They watch Ukrainian TV and Russian TV, and they are making a very conscious choice: They want to be with Russia and here is why.” The family she talks to shows them a clip with kids in Western Ukraine jumping and shouting: “One nation, One country, One Fatherland! Hang the Muscovites! (this is what they call Russian speakers):

The man says: “It’s a school in Kyiv. These are kids. They are shouting “Hang the Russians, Hang the Russians!” And now he’s telling me we’re the separatists, we’re the bad guys? How do you think that makes us feel?” Their grandmother lives in Russia, and she says her pension is 4 times bigger than it would be in Ukraine, but that she would say no more because they would “call her a separatist”.

Most of them, however, were not “separatists”: they demanded autonomy from Kyiv as a safety guarantee for their lives, from the beginning the ruling politicians, who climbed to power after Euromaidan, decided they had no right to make demands.

Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото) Lugansk, mid July, civilians killed by the Ukrainian army.

Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото)

Ukrainian troops firing Howitzers including into civilian populated areas:

Военные действия в Донбассе без прикрас (90 фото)

These videos shows unarmed civilians trying to stop tanks with their bare hands, they were considered “terrorists” by the aggressor government in Kyiv. In 21st century the west has legitimized a government they forced to power – with the support of nazi squads – to kill the local population, this will have dreadful implications for the populations in Europe and the U.S..

After months of civil war, support for separatists seems to have increased to 37%, this is more proof which makes clear that people in the east resist Kyiv for reasons other than joining Russia. Some dozens soldiers in the Ukrainian army have deserted and crossed over to Russia, they said they could not kill their own people. The population in Western Ukraine is increasingly opposed to war, more and more protest their sons being taken by force to fight in the east. In Ternopil, the Ukrainian army forcibly sends “recruits” to war, attacking their mothers who refused to let their sons be taken to the front. See video here. In some localities, mothers have cut down trees to block the roads so that they can save their children from being taken by the army – read here about such protests in Bukovina. In Nikolaev, a Molotov cocktail was thrown at the army’s recruitment office.

Conscripts are burning their draft notifications and say, “We don’t need your war! We didn’t go to your Maidan, we didn’t create all this mess. Whoever did it, let them fight!”

This video documents more atrocities committed by the Ukrainian government against the civilian population in the east of the country; you can see another one here.

Even some western media outlets have begun to acknowledge that nothing works to make the eastern civilian population cave in to Kyiv, but they never mention that the reason for this is the ”national revolution” in Western Ukraine which would have people in the east convert to praising nazis. This they will never do.

10245325_791113674232491_3096433495279468827_n Western Ukraine, 1941.

Svoboda’s neo-nazis beat people in Lviv, two weeks after Svoboda came to power, march 2014.

This video explains how these ones see themselves. It’s a “war-cut” as Yarosh said.

The pic below depicts how Kyiv’s propaganda portrays the Russians in eastern Ukraine; it is just an example of many more, way more sick. This is how the people who go in the east to “liberate” cities think.  These are the people encouraged and financed by their supporters in the neocon-led State Department from Washington and the Pentagon. They have been praised and whitewashed by neocons, John McCain has urged war against Russia on their behalf.

This is a capture from a public page of neo-nazis from Right Sector.azov_terrorist In Eastern Ukraine, anyone can be a terrorist and get arrested if neo-nazi Azov says so, the nazi sun is one of their symbols. “EuroMaidan killed the Ukrainian in me, now I am a Russian.”


In Odessa, neo-nazis are pursuing cultural purification; they try to disrupt concerts and events. Weeks after the massacre at the trade union building, Odessa was declared “a Bandera city” by Right Sector leader Yarosh, in a shocking insult towards the city. Second video shows their violence towards people who do not express hatred towards Russia.

BrJ_02wCQAEh47B Neo-nazi from Azov marching to war. Right Sector cafe in Lviv. Guns pro-Kyiv forces recently received for the war in the east.


Lugansk, mid July.


The Rada’ speaker (the parliament) has fired two commissars who sent his son a notification that he has been recruited to go to war. This happens when thousands of young people in Ukraine are taken by force to war. This one is Yulia Tymoshenko’s most loyal lieutenant; his dad fought in Hitler’s army. Source

Bandera-like Holocaust collaborators and fuhrer wannabes are not something the West should ever be allowed to play with in Eastern Europe, but they do. NATO is never questioned on their support for these neo-nazis, possibly because NATO don’t care for anything except getting to exploit the resources in the east. The atrocities committed by OUN, UPA and Bandera in eastern Ukraine are part of local history.

The war in eastern Ukraine takes place on a terrain whose resources are targeted both by NATO-backed capitalists and by Russia. There is also the South Stream pipeline which would allow Russia to bypass Ukraine. The U.S. behave like a colonial power in Europe.


Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources of the Dnieper–Donets Basin Province and Pripyat Basin Province, Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus, 2010: The U.S. Geological Survey, using a geology-based assessment methodology, estimated mean volumes of technically recoverable, conventional, undiscovered petroleum resources at 84 million barrels of crude oil, 4.7 trillion cubic feet of natural gas, and 130 million barrels of natural gas liquids for the Dnieper–Donets Basin Province and 39 million barrels of crude oil, 48 billion cubic feet of natural gas, and 1 million barrels of natural gas liquids for the Pripyat Basin Province. The assessments are part of a program to estimate these resources for priority basins throughout the world.” Source 

The neo-nazis violence is ever more increasing in Western Ukraine too: this is just one example of many. During a concert, they jumped on the stage and attacked a member of a rock band because he refused to say a fascist slogan. Lately, attacks against elected officials have increased but it is not known yet who’s responsible.

Such are the social conditions IMF craves; because it allows them to stay out of the sight of the people they hurt or destroy. However, IMF’s implication in what is happening in Ukraine seems to take some dreadful dimension. It is confirmed that Bertie Ahern, who gave Ireland ”IMF’s kiss of death”, is involved in secret ”peace negotiations” in Eastern Ukraine, on the side of the Ukrainian army and their nazis; he claims the Kyiv forces “fight for the future of Europe”. This individual is the one who ruined Ireland.

There is no mention in Western media about the social crimes the IMF are provoking in Ukraine: people already cannot pay their bills since life costs have skyrocketed, and winters in Ukraine can be deadly unless they are provided with heating, which many cannot afford. This can turn into a social crime; IMF does it so that the gas imports from Russia are kept low. IMF has never been investigated or prosecuted for the death they left behind following their capitalist accumulation.

”People who protest for pensions, salaries and social benefits are FSB (Russian secret service) agents”, accused the Ukrainian PM days before his cabinet resigned until early elections. He is forcing on Ukrainins the IMF program which will led millions into worse poverty. See here video translated in English.

MP Levchenko kicked out of Parliament Opposition politician is thrown out of the parliament after he opposed the government sending more troops to the war in the east. Ruling politicians are demanding the prosecution of 304 politicians in the opposition for “separatism”; Kyiv plans to ban the communist party and the party of the ousted president Yanukovych. The political spectrum will be shared by neo-nazis, fascists, and neocons. Early elections for Rada are due later this year. Read more, here.

Meanwhile, Interpol has fulfilled Russia’s request, forwarded in April, to issue an arrest warrant for the leader of neo-nazi Right Sector, Dmitry Yarosh.
He’s a close collaborator of the chief of SBU (Ukrainian secret service) and of A.Parubyi, who is the boss of the national security council, supervising police, armed forces and secret forces.
His squads are participating in Ukraine’s so-called ”anti-terrorist operation”, and some of their recruits have been incorporated in the National Guard, and possibly even the army. Recently he told his squads that he would go to the United States to request more weaponry.
Right Sector have been involved in armed street battles with the police during the euromaidan; they are trying to replace the police now.
Yarosh has been legitimized by major western media outlets.
After the Odessa massacre, he posted videos mocking the victims and praising Kyiv’s butchers.


Yarosh is seen by most of the armed troops of Kyiv as the leader of the ”national revolution” in Ukraine and his ideas are reinforcing the nazi ideology of OUN; they are shared by ruling politicians in Kyiv too. He expressed them in his book “The nation and the revolution”, and they are very similar to those of the neo-nazi crusader and mass-murdered Breivik. During the euromaidan, he promised ”a European Reconquista”.


Human Rights organisations are timidly starting to see some of the massacres of civilians committed by the Kyiv forces in the east of Ukraine, inhabited by most of the country’s Russian speaking population, and depositing some of the richest natural resources in the world.

It is not known how many civilians Kyiv forces have murdered in the east, since the start of the civil war for which they take no responsibility and only blame Russian rebels of which only some are separatists. There are only estimates: the government of Kyiv said close to 500 people; the UN said over 1,000 were killed during ATO. The UN ignores the violence the government of Kyiv promotes – ruling politicians asking for massacres in the east, the incumbent prime-minister demanding “wiping out” of the “sub-humans”, words repeated by the current president – and instead speaks of “terror in the east”, while attempting to identify rebels with criminals, who are exploiting the conditions created by the civil war. The UN blames rebels for using heavy weaponry, but fails to recognize that government’s war planes bomb civilians on regular bases, with impunity.

While conservative-dominated western media is ever more loudly decrying a “Russian invasion”, they hardly mention that the Ukraine army shelled Russia repeatedly, in provocation, and killed civilians in their homes, in Russia. NATO has not mentioned this either.

Slavyansk, while being “liberated” by the government of Kyiv.

See also:

*** A Bloody Farce: Ukraine, MH 17, and the Charge of the Atlanticist Brigade

”The key evidence for the overall investigation will be the surveillance records of US and Russian satellites and radars, which should be able to identify where the missiles came from, as well as addressing accusations that Kyiv fighters were shadowing the jet, etc…. The Russians have already distributed a fair amount of evidentiary chaff of varying quality, claiming that a Ukranian BUK radar was switched on at the time of the incident; Robert Parry’s US defense sources are also telling him there’s a suspicion that a Ukrainian BUK battery was responsible. … To date, the US strategy seems to be to crank up the indignation machine by whatever means come to hand, in this case excoriating Russia for obstructions of the investigation that aren’t occurring, in order to justify immediate further sanctions that would short circuit Russia’s desire for a conventional, legalistic, and protracted investigation.” by CounterPunch 

*** “The Neocons and Holocaust revisionism in Eastern Europe”: read it here

*** “Blaming Russia as ‘Flat Fact’”, read it here.


Miners In Donetsk Call For World To Stop Kyiv Fascists’ Massacres In The East of Ukraine


This child was murdered by the Ukrainian forces on June 8 when they bombed Slavyansk. She was 6 years old.

This is what Kyiv’s “anti-terrorist operation” means in Eastern Ukraine:

This is how nazis see the people they murder in eastern Ukraine:


This was shared by Yarosh, they see Russians as “colorado beetles”, not as human beings.

These are nazis holding a pro-war demonstration in Kyiv, they demand that their military campaign in eastern Ukraine not be stopped.


Nazis who are killing civilians in eastern Ukraine see themselves as a reincarnation of Hitler’s SS Galicia division and of the UPA who committed horrific massacres during World War II. Their ideology sees tolerance as a crime. Wolfsangel is a nazi symbol, it is the expression of their idea of nation. These images are part of their own propaganda, it’s not the Russians who post them, it’s the nazis from Western Ukraine posting them relentlessly.


2nd ss panzer division

These are the nazis sponsored and supported by NATO countries. They attacked Russia four times already, last time when they shelled its territory they murdered a man and injured two other people, they hit houses and a bloc of flats in Russia’s territory. Nazis hope to drag NATO into a full-scale war with Russia, which would give them the perfect cover to “wipe out” the Russian ethnics in eastern Ukraine. This is the real aim of their “national revolution”. We’ll explain in another blog, extensively, why they should be called nazis and how they see their “national revolution”.


reblog from this source,

“This is an appeal from Mikhail Alexeevich Krylov, who is the representative of the Independent Donetsk Miners’ Trade Union. He was co-chairman of the City Strike Committee in Donetsk during the big miners’ strikes in 1991 and later on in the 1990s. He is now the leader of the Independent Miners Union of Donetsk, which organises over 1,000 mine-workers.

Statement from Independent Donetsk Miners’ Trade Union

Brother miners,

We need to explain to you the true state of affairs in Donbas. The real picture of what is happening has been misinterpreted or hushed by European media. We understand that you may not find it easy to come to the correct conclusions; and therefore, we declare that we – the miners – are forced to fight with weapons in our hands for the sake of our lives – in the name of survival!

Our interest in this confrontation is one: end the bloodshed! The end of the war will be the trial of the war criminals that began it. We can not give up, because it would mean our full moral and physical destruction! From the outset, “Euromaidan” has been under the control of the big bourgeoisie: Ukrainian oligarchs and their foreign masters. In February of this year, there was a coup in Ukraine with the active participation of neo-Nazi organizations. In response to this, there was a protest movement in the South-East of the country, which at first was pushing innocuous slogans such as federalization and Russian as a second state language. This was greeted with terror.

In Donbas, there is a real war in which civilians are killed: including the elderly, women and children. You are being blatantly lied to that this war is between Ukraine and Russia. But it is not so! The war is between the people and a handful of oligarchs with the support of the EU and U.S. authorities. The tragedy in Ukraine is that, those in power, managed to infect the people with certain fascist ideas. We, the residents of Donbas, fight against all manifestations of Nazism and Fascism. We fight with weapons in hand, for our lives and the lives of our loved ones. We have nowhere to retreat – this is our land! We appeal to you, the workers of the European countries, asking for your help and solidarity: help us break the stronghold of fascism in Ukraine. This will be our common victory!

Mikhail Alexeevich Krylov,

Representative from Independent Donetsk Miners’ Trade Union

NOTE: Donetsk miners marched on June 18 against Kiev’s “anti-terrorist operation” and gave a 48-hour ultimatum that they would take up arms unless the war stopped.”


The Bombing Of Civilians In Lugansk By The Kyiv Government *Graphic*– Behind Ukraine’s Walls of Fire (IV)


Inna Kukurudza was in the center of Lugansk, talking on the phone with her daughter, when she was bombed by an aircraft of the Kyiv government, June 2, 2014. The airstrike hit a public building, which came under the control of the anti-Kyiv population a month ago. It also hit a nearby park. 

This is the testimony of the daughter of Inna Kukurudza. Her mother was bombed in the city of Lugansk by a war plane of the Kyiv government, on June 2, 2014 – a month after the Odessa massacre. 8 passers-by in the mostly Russian speaking city were killed and 20 wounded in the bombing,which targeted a public building under the control of the anti-Kyiv population. This, among many others, was a crime against humanity committed by the government in Kyiv for which they must be prosecuted by the Hague tribunal, according to the Geneva conventions, even if such acts do not constitute a violation of the domestic law of the country in which they were committed (see note* at the end of the blog).

The government in Kyiv has been killing civilians in the east since March. Under the pretext of an imaginary war with Russia, they are pursuing their ultra-reactionary “national revolution,” which aims at getting their fatherland free of “occupants” and “Moskali,” as they call the Russian speaking population in the east. To pursue this agenda, the neo-nazis who control state armed forces are building themselves a separate 60,000 army – which will be under their control and which will be used to  command state power. The massacres of civilian population in Ukraine, praised by the West, are just beginning. Under their cover, the government can also maintain a state of emergency in Ukraine, which they need so that the IMF is not met with any resistance to their brutal capitalist accumulation, a.k.a “structural adjustment.”

 “I live in Lugansk. Today a tragedy came to our family.

I was talking to my mother on the phone when two big fighter airplanes flew over the cinema Ukraina and over the state administration building.

The airplanes circled above, one over my head, one over my mother’s head, then flew away…

The one over the city center flew over my head, then over the movie theater and turned to the city center…

It flew over the state administration building where my mom was looking over the lists of the wounded.

I heard a rumbling sound and saw the airplane shooting a volley of automatic gunfire.

The airplanes left dark stripes in the sky, three or four stripes.

lugansk bombing june 2 2014

The moment the war plane launched the airstrike against the city of Lugansk, June 2 2014. Capture from this video.

This is the moment when the city center of Lugansk was hit by the projectiles fired by the Ukrainian war plane. Source

The phone conversation with my mom broke, I realized the shell hit the city, the city center.

I ran to my car and drove there.

Militia tried to stop me, they said the airplanes were still circling and there would be another attack.

But I forced my way through.

As you will see in the video, mom asked for help.

It was horrible. Many people died.

The ground floor was heavily damaged, a shell hit there.

Another shell hit the second floor, and another hit the third.

There were big holes in the ground all over the park, shell craters.

Shell fragments lay all over the place.

Today is June 2, 2014.

My mom died on the way to the hospital.”

Her mom was Inna Vladimirovna Kukurudza, 48 years old, a social worker. She was a human being who believed in compassion. She was murdered by the contract killers of politicians who later met “world leaders” and joked and laughed and made more deals for military contracts – to kill more people like her.  She was not a real person to the government of Kyiv, she was a “Putinist” and “a terrorist” because she voted against them in a local referendum on May 11, and because she is an ethnic Russian. The government in Kyiv have a licence to kill civilians in the east of Ukraine because the Western totalitarian leaders have many lies to hide – worst of them being that they backed neo-nazis to power during the power reshuffle back in February. Their EuroMaidan was a huge propaganda operation, which pushed people who are connected to neo-nazi organizations to power.


Inna Vladimirovna Kukurudza was one of the 8 civilians killed by the government of Kyiv on June 2, 2014 in a bombardment against the city of Lugansk.


All the people killed in the airstrike against the public administration building in the center of Lugansk were civilians, most of them were women. People injured inside the building almost burned alive in a fire that started after the bombing.





At seconds 0:03, 0:05, 0:08, 0:12, 0:15, 0:23, 0:27 in this video, you can see repeated cannon fire then at 0:22 another projectile being fired over the city center of Lugansk. This proves that this airstrike was not unintentional, or a mistake, it was deliberate.



This video captured the destruction inside the building.


When medics took her to the hospital, Inna was still breathing; she died on the way there. These are six videos which captured the aftermath of the bombardment by the government of Kyiv against the city of Lugansk. They are among the few which were not deleted by youtube. Yet.

These are the civilians some mainstream media in the west are not keen on talking about. While this crime against humanity was committed by the Kyiv government against the people of Lugansk, at the border there was heavy fighting between the government’s National Guard (Right Sector recruits, indoctrinated and trained by the neo-nazis like Parubiy and Yarosh into believing that the Russian population in the east are “occupants” and “enemies of the nation”) and armed locals in the east; there are mercenaries on both sides, but mainstream media reports only about those on the rebels’ side.

The rebels, called “terrorists” by the government of Kyiv, attacked a border check-point; previously they shot down at least one helicopter. The government launched 150 airstrikes against Lugansk on June 2, 2014, in what they call an “anti-terrorist operation,” ATO, which in fact is brutal military repression against a disobedient population in the Russian speaking dominated east. The government launched airstrikes against the Locomotive Plant in Lugansk. 

The government of Kyiv later reported “mission accomplished” – that meaning that they “wiped out” the rebels. But later it came to light that they actually retreated from the area after the rebels overtook some of their men – it’s not clear if they surrendered on their own or were captured. (On May 22, Kyiv soldiers deployed at a checkpoint in Lugansk surrendered on their own.) There were loses on both sides. The incumbent president of the country — put in this chair after they confiscated state power on February 22, he is to leave office on Sunday when the new oligarch-president Poroshenko will be put in power– said they will consider imposing “martial law” in Lugansk and Donetsk – this means they want a free hand to kill anyone they want with impunity. It will be a full display of state terrorism, which is just beginning in the east of Ukraine. The Kyiv propaganda is urging a total wipe out of the “terrorists” in the east, but they make no distinction between civilians and armed men. Actually, they are not interested in making any.

The person who announced that “ATO” will continue in the east for a long time – and lots of money, 3 million a day – is some hotshot in the presidential administration of Kyiv, and during the EuroMaidan he was caught with automatic riffles in the truck of his car.

Sergei Pashinsky also lied during the local referenda held by the Donbass people; he actually said that “nobody voted” in these referenda (EU’s Catherine Ashton claimed that they lacked “democratic legitimacy” – that meaning their approval, not people voting for what they wanted, defying the threats of the armed thugs of the government of Kyiv). However, on May 25th, an official in Lugansk was murdered by Kyiv’s men because he opposed opening polling stations for the state presidential elections.


These are traces left by the projectiles fired by the war plane of the Kyiv government in the park near the building where 8 passers-by were killed in the bombardment of June 2, 2014.

The pathological liars of the Kyiv government 

For once, the Kyiv government is right: “Terrorists bombed Lugansk,” they claimed. This was their first reaction to the bombardment of Lugansk. Indeed, there were terrorists who bombed Lugansk: the terrorists are those in the government and state armed forces apparatus in Kyiv. They’ve terrorized the population in the east for months now. (Terrorism is imposing a policy or decision by inflicting terror on the civilian population, quite common when the IMF is around). The first reaction of the government in Kyiv seems always to be to blame one’s side for killing their own – this was also their reaction to what they’ve done in Odessa and Mariupol.


The propaganda channels of the Kyiv government accused the rebels – which they call “terrorists” – of killing the civilians in the city they control; local population occupied the building bombed a month ago. They keep denying that a war plane of the Kyiv government bombed the city, in spite of all images which prove the contrary. In Odessa they did the same: they accused the victims they massacred of burning themselves alive.

This is typical of the Kyiv government’s propaganda, which is controlled by the Right Sector — first they said there was no war plane, and that “terrorists” bombed their own; then they said there was no bombing from any aircraft, because “the explosion” occurred inside the public administration building — as ATO spokesperson claimed — ; then they said it was a Russian plane bombing the Russian-speaking population in Lugansk, then they said they did not do it. The Ukrainian media said that the bombing was done by “illegal armed forces” (rebels) who tried to fire at “the Ukrainian air force, but instead hit the window of the building.”


They call the bombing “a fire,” which is pretty much what the mainstream media reported too.

When even OSCE admitted that there was an airstrike, the Kyiv government propaganda claimed they were lying because “the rebels” were holding some of their personnel in captivity. OSCE said, “rockets hit the occupied regional administration building. Based on the SMM’s limited observation these strikes were the result of non-guided rockets shot from an aircraft. The number of casualties is unknown. A number of Luhansk city and region inhabitants tried to escape the combat zone. The SMM learned that trains to Kharkiv and Kyiv appeared to be fully booked for the next couple of days.”

These people are refugees of war – for the simple reason that the government of Kyiv is shelling, firing at them, and killing them for months in Slaviansk,Krasny Liman,Kramatorsk, and again now in Lugansk, after the Kyiv government committed massacres against the civilian populations in Odessa and Mariupol.


The Kyiv propagandists outdid themselves however when they invented the story about the rocket being fired at the building controlled by rebels by an invisible “terrorist” with a RPG on his shoulder, in broad daylight. They argued that on the surveillance camera there can be seen a flame – the moment when the rocket was fired and seconds later the big explosion further down on the street. This is what Yarosh said it happened, and their propaganda channels insist even now that it’s what happened. They invented “a terrorist” who was firing at a building the people of Lugansk took control over a month ago. It made sense to them that rebels bomb the buildings they controlled. Nobody saw this shooter because he did not exist.

What did exist was a war plane of the Kyiv government bombing the city. This war plane was seen by dozens and filmed by some, while it bombed the civilian population of Lugansk. Here are some pics from this video, where you can see clearly it’s not a mistake.

airstrike lugansk june 2 2014 aircraft

This is the war plane which bombed Lugansk on June 2, 2014.

This is another video of the war plane bombing the city center of Lugansk:

This video records the shelling during the night that followed after the bombing of the city center of Lugansk on June 2:

The pics below are taken from the images recorded by a surveillance camera- they recorded different moments in time when different projectiles hit the city center. Kyiv propaganda said the flame at the second 0:36 was “proof” that a rocket from a RPG was fired by an invisible man in the park – he must be invisible because nobody saw him. In fact 0:36 was the moment when the first projectile hit the park. Then others hit.

There were more projectiles fired in this area by the Kyiv government airplane –  their moment of impact is different in time. The person who filmed the video we posted above filmed at least 8 rounds of fire – among one is a rocket. It took 23 seconds to fire them – that video is not edited. It does not mean this is all that the war plane fired – it is only what has been filmed.


On the images captured by the surveillance camera in the center of Lugansk, you can also see more projectiles — falling at different moments in time — , which is consistent with the canon fire by the Ukrainian government airplane.  tc_projectiles park

CNN talked to an expert who said that ”whatever detonations hit the building and the adjoining park came from the air. The tops of trees were splintered, and a series of small craters — about a dozen — had been blasted in a straight line, starting in the park and reaching the walls of the building, blowing out many of its windows and spraying the area with jagged shrapnel. That’s what appears to have killed most of the victims and injured 20 more. The pattern of the craters clearly indicated some sort of strafing, according to a munitions expert at the scene with CNN. Their size suggested 30-millimeter ordinance, he said, which is standard equipment on the Su-25, a ground attack fighter, and the Su-27 — both combat aircraft operated by Ukraine.” Source 

The next day after they bombed civilians in the center of Lugansk, the United States promised more “military help” for Kyiv, which is planning to impose martial law in Donetsk and Lugansk – that is, getting a free hand at killing.

Anyone contradicting the self-victimizing propaganda of the aggressor Kyiv government, or if you dare look at facts, you must know they will immediately say that it is “Russian propaganda” – because for them reality and facts are only those they can use to pursue more death in the east — their nazis post on their pages calls to “burn the Moskali, and kill them in the name of jesus christ,” and express joy at the thought of exterminating the civilian population in the east. There is armed resistance against them  in the east, but these most of these fighters are locals who took up arms after Kyiv announced they would use military might against them; it is not them executing children and passers-by in Slaviansk. The Kyiv government has attacked the civilian population with tanks, helicopters, and have shot civilians in their cars on their way home, at their balcony for looking at them, and they have shelled schools, hospitals, factories, they have bombed peasants’ homes in villages. (Just a reminder: the “European values promoters” nazis in the government of Kyiv had guns at EuroMaidan since December 2013, as it was admitted publicly by their cult leader Yarosh.)

The Kyiv government needs to be seen as “the victim” – this is why they attack anyone pointing facts at them. They need to be pictured in the public opinion in the West as “victims”, while they constantly incite crimes against the Russian speaking population in the east. They even expressed joy at the massacre their nazis committed in Odessa on May 2, 2014, and fascist Svoboda politicians have called for all of the Russian speaking population be shot –  see what we blogged about the Odessa massacre.

They have been killing civilians at large in the east, but the attack in Lugansk has been documented and it shows their real agenda in this “pacification” operation in the east, which they also use as pretext to build a separate 60,000 strong army under the control of nazis like Yarosh and Parubiy and the head of the SBU, the secret service of Ukraine.

This is Aleksander Ott, from Starovarvarivka village, watching his wife’s grave being dug, next to their child. Lena and their son, Pavel, were killed by the Ukrainian government armed forces who fired at them in their car. It is not known how many people were just executed like this by the armed thugs of the Kyiv government in the east, but it is known that, except some mercenaries, most armed fighters against Kyiv are residents of Eastern Ukraine – peasants, workers, and more and more women. Read more about how the government of Ukraine destroyed Alekdander Ott’s family on Al Jazeera‘s site.

 Media covering up for the Kyiv killings 

Read it all here: “No doubt the BBC considered that by reporting both claims it was being even-handed, but even a minimal amount of fact-checking would have allowed it to determine which claim was objectively correct.

The Guardian newspaper did not even attempt to present two sides to the story. It repeated the government claim that rebels had killed the civilians with an anti-aircraft missile and omitted any information about aircraft.

North American media were barely interested in the story.

Close observation of recent Western reporting on Ukraine reveals a clear pattern: when the Ukrainian government or its supporters kill civilians, this is consistently downplayed or ignored. When incidents are reported at all, the media’s framing obscures agency and thus responsibility for what has happened. Such reporting causes the public to view international events through a distorted lens, which contributes to the production of foreign policy based on ignorance.” Source

 The intervention of the US and EU imperialist powers is a highly dangerous provocation from the point of view of the genuine interests, not only of all Ukrainians but also of the workers and middle classes of Europe and North America. It is part of their more general policy of an aggressive militarized offensive against their Russian imperialist rival. Although Russia is much weaker in all respects than the USA and, economically, weaker than the EU, Western policy has allowed Putin to pose as the defender of the Russian-speaking population of Ukraine. However, their interests are completely subordinate to his strategic goal, which is to maintain a buffer between Russian territory and NATO’s already advanced front line. If Eastern Ukrainians put their fate in his hands, they are heading for catastrophe.” read more, here: “Counterrevolution and resistance in Ukraine”

The people in Ukraine who are suffering due to the current conflict between the opposing forces are getting stuck in the crossfire of nationalist militarism. The only people who stand to benefit from such a situation are oligarchs and far-right extremists on both sides. —  read it all here: “Ukraine: Anti-Fascism Not Russian Nationalism | Insights on the Donetsk Situation and the Crisis in Ukraine — Political profiles of the Donetsk Movement of the Donetsk People’s Republic”.

Also this:  “The Left Opposition consistently downplays the right wing nationalist character of the forces in the Kyiv regime, demanding recognition of its “legitimacyand painting its opponents as Russian separatists, if not agents of Putin.”


* Geneva conventions:

Article 6.

The Tribunal established by the Agreement referred to m Article 1 hereof for the trial and punishment of the major war criminals of the European Axis countries shall have the power to try and punish persons who, acting in the interests of the European Axis countries, whether as individuals or as members of organizations, committed any of the following crimes.

The following acts, or any of them, are crimes coming within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal for which there shall be individual responsibility:

(a) CRIMES AGAINST PEACE: namely, planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing;

(b) WAR CRIMES: namely, violations of the laws or customs of war. Such violations shall include, but not be limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity;

(c)CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY: namely, murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against any civilian population, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.”


Aftermath of the bombardment of the city of Lugansk by the Kyiv government forces.





After the Odessa Massacre, Nazis Colonize State Armed Forces – Behind Ukraine’s Walls Of Fire (II)

 Continued from part I, see also the video blog


Under the cover of a wall of fire, inside the Trade Union building on Kulikovo square, scores of people were butchered to death in Odessa on May 2, 2014. The survivors were arrested and beaten by their aggressors on the way to the police vans and even inside the police vans. The victims have been blamed for their own deaths. The victims were called “terrorists” by the Right Sector‘s propaganda machine.

RS euromaidan accusing victims of being terrorists Odessa

Government propaganda posted by one of the neo-nazi Right Sector channels. “Citizens” are the ultras and the Right Sector who attacked and burned down the trade union building – they already knew weapons were hidden in the building, though investigators discovered those later. “There is a fire in the building” – is manipulation: they set up the building on fire. This is quite a telling example of how they pursued their propaganda about the EuroMaidan, and their propaganda after they got to power. Of course the victims were labeled “terrorists”, so that Right Sector’s crimes could be justified as “citizens’ defence.”

On May 2, 2014, “the city of shadows” saw one of the worst atrocities since the pogroms of the past. People from Odessa related the massacre at the trade union building with Khatyn where a Nazi battalion, formed mostly of Ukrainian nationalists from Western Ukraine, exterminated the entire population of a village in Belarus. During World War II, the Romanian Nazi occupation army committed one of the worst massacres of the past century in Odessa where they exterminated over 100,000 Jews – then blamed it on the victims

r 1

By some optical illusion, some see only what suits their propaganda or war mongering. Those who butchered and burned people alive in Odessa are praised by the civilized world as “law enforcers.” Just like the Tsarist massacre from “Battleship Potemkin” never happened on the staircase of Odessa, but some still believe it did, the massacre at Kulikovo Trade Union building did happen for real and hardly anyone wants to admit it.


First, Right Sector set on fire the tents of the anti-government protestors…


…while some entered the building, beating and shooting those inside.


People in the building were from Odessa and two other Ukrainian localities. The Kyiv government said they were “Russian agents.” Neo-nazi Right Sector said they were “terrorists.”

Right Sector inside the building before they set it on fire.


To cover up for the nazis, the government said the people inside set themselves on fire. Image captures a Molotov thrown at the people inside by Right Sector.

10270306_788701417809193_2161230597155389_n (2)

Later the government had to admit the evidence – that people were shot inside the building, but nobody is looking for the criminals.

1 gunfire


right sector odessa 1



Two of the victims who were murdered.

download (7)

he later talks to police 2

Red armbands, supposedly against the Kyiv government. They are believed to have been provocateurs infiltrated among the anti-Kyiv protestors – police allowed them to clash with Kyiv’ ultras, which were also helped by police.


On May 2, the government launched a military offensive to quell a rebellion in the industrial east. Government in Kyiv is inciting hatred towards miners on strike and disobedient residents, by lying that they are “Russian agents”.

right sector_the sword and the cross

Neo-nazi holy war propaganda: “The sword and the cross”; they relate it the Bible, “I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.”


John Kerry from the State Department with – at that time – one of the richest capitalist in Ukraine, who was elected president on May 25; he was called “CEO of the Revolution”, he was among those who financed the EuroMaidan.

The defining element of the nazis propaganda can be clearly seen when the images of the “humanitarian” nazis, while they were publicly executing people, will be later used by the Right Sector to support their claim that they were actually “the saviors,” when in fact they have done the killings.




This video shows people fallen from the building on fire being clubbed on the ground.


This massacre was everything Odessa was not. But, it was everything the people in power in Kyiv meant it to be. It’s like they are really trying to convince people in Ukraine they can’t live with each other anymore. Their prime-minister – who had worked for the IMF – has said, ”We are at war with Russia. This is a type of new war. We are a war cabinet.

[It took the Kyiv government almost two months to admit that, after Crimea’s referendum to join Russia, the first thing they did was to take their weaponry from Crimea to use it now to kill civilians in the east (Russia recognized it was the property of Ukraine): “aircrafts – 75 units, ships – 32 units, automobiles – 1341 unit, missile and artillery – 120 units, armored vehicles (tanks and IFV) – 121 units, communications and equipment – 201 units, operational support equipment – 302 units, logistical equipment – 400 units, etc.” These weaponry is used against the civilian population in the east; the military occupation and invasion started only after it was in the possession of Kyiv government. All this happened while the Kyiv government was asking NATO for “help” – they were asking for a full scale war IN Ukraine (meaning against civilians in Ukraine) – because Russian forces were supposedly “invading” their country. Source

After they got to power in Kyiv, the Right Sector propaganda started to spread old maps with their country extending over Russia’s current territory, and what they mean is to be found in all their war sermons at their training camps long before the EuroMaidan.]

pic 90 lllll

This image was captured by Reuters mid-March during the training of neo-nazi Right Sector (aka National Guard) on one of the premises of the ministry of interior.

In fact, they are at war with their own population, who might not accept what the IMF wants to do to them: intolerable increase in gas prices, electricity bills, cuts in essential social services, unemployment. Then, there are the oligarchs’ gang (capitalist class) fights among each other. However, here’s a map for Yatsenuyk and his lying neo-nazi Parubiy who, at the time of this pathetic war mongering interview, knew very well that Ukrainian soldiers killed each other, he still claimed foreign aggressors did.

They’re not “at war with Russia,” but with the population within Ukraine’s borders. Elected president, Petro Poroshenko, who was Kyiv’s negotiator during the Crimea crisis, threatens the local population there to inflict economic sanctions because they voted – until proven otherwise – against Kyiv. He also said they will “disarm” Donbass. So, get this: if a worker goes on strike, the government in Kyiv calls him “a Russian agent” – this was reported by a “liberated” Ukrainian television network. Meanwhile he is the one with business interests in Russia. Now the government in Kyiv plans to end the self-proclaimed republics in Lugansk and Donetsk by 4th, respectively 14th June. This means they will unleash more indiscriminate terror against civilian populations, who are already treated as “insurgents.” Hundreds have been executed at point blank, bombed, shelled, shot, gunned down, schools and hospitals have been bombed, and blocs of flats are bombed. Before elections he promised a referendum on federalization. Two days after the elections he delivered tanks and bombs, and armed thugs killing civilians at random.

Kyiv is mainly responsible for radicalizing the rebellion in the east – it was the government in Kyiv who alienated, attacked, insulted, mocked and turned the eastern population into scapegoats. Villagers and residents in the cities stopped tanks with their bare hands. Then, some armed themselves.

Photo journalist Andrea Rocchelli was killed by government forces (they deny it). This was his last photo: children of Slavyansk taking refuge in a cellar when their town was bombed by “peace and security” forces deployed against civilians in the east by the Kyiv government.

Svoboda‘s leader demanded the death penalty or jail for life for dissenters whom he calls “separatists.” The government calls anyone a “separatist” and “terrorist” who has a legitimate problem with them. Whether they want to remain in Ukraine or they want to split, all dissenters in the east are against the chauvinistic government in Kyiv. 

“Separatists”? The separatists are the ones who demanded in the Western media that Ukraine should split up, because it would be “the best thing.” Here are some of them:
– Alexander Motyl, “a professor at Rutgers University and an expert on Ukrainian affairs” saying that splitting Ukraine “might just be the best thing that could happen.” (The Atlantic, February 20, 2014)
– Eugene Rumer, “It would be better to split Ukraine than to tear it apart.” (Financial Times, May 8, 2014)
– May 3, Forbes: “Break Ukraine in Two”: “Splitting Ukraine on a mutually agreed border that starts with the Crimean peninsula, can allow Russia to annex the breakaway portions if it so chooses.”
Yatsenuyk used the Russia-scare to imply support for Svoboda’s demands that Ukraine gets the nuclear weapon. Earlier, some capitalist media even said that a nuclear confrontation with Russia “has to be done:
The Economist”, February 22-28, 2014, said that a nuclear confrontation with Russia is “difficult but it has to be done.” Fascist Svoboda plans to get the nuclear weapon – it’s in their program – and end of May, the secret service SBU boss (a Neo-nazi himself) declared that Ukraine has “the right and might consider, restoration of nuclear weapon,” and use it for “diplomatic purposes.”
It’s not for nothing they remind of Dr. Strangelove: “Though clearly a minority, Ukraine’s neo-Nazis remain a potent force that is well-organized, well-motivated and prone to extreme violence, whether throwing firebombs at police in the Maidan or at ethnic Russians trapped in a building in Odessa. As vengeance now seeks vengeance across Ukraine, this Nazi imperative will be difficult to hold down, much as Dr. Strangelove struggled to stop his arm from making a “Heil Hitler” salute.” Source 

Last month, the interim president Oleksandr Turchynov reinstated the military draft, now recruits are forced to serve in the National Guard too. Parubiy repeatedly asked the United States for military help against the civilian population in his own country. Days after they came to power, using the Russia scare they themselves fuel constantly, Andriy Parubiy and his lieutenant, Yarosh, have called for “a wartime mass mobilization” and insisted they are preparing for ”a war with Russia.” Yarosh has called for a guerrilla war in Crimea, which is now in the territory of Russia, hoping that Moscow won’t back down and attack them this time. While Putin had said Russia respects the results of the May 25th elections, Svoboda calls for more bloodshed. Svoboda’s normalized Neo-nazi boss describes the former regime in Ukraine in words that would better fit their own. He never mentions that they kidnap anyone they want in broad daylight from the streets of Ukraine. Svoboda’s leader never mentioned such interesting realities like that in Lvov, for instance, if youngsters want to socialize they are forced to submit to the Neo-nazi ideology of some local pubs – if they don’t adhere to it, they are denied access. Since day one, they have been at war with the people living and working in Ukraine. Odessa made that obvious.

Politicians and officials from Kyiv and the Western world, as well as Western mainstream media shamelessly blamed the massacre on the victims and said they set themselves on fire (the government said, “The cause of fire House of Trade Unions in Odessa could be Molotov cocktails thrown from the roof”; bloggers disseminated that; Washington Post published it; then some apologist for the massacre blamed the victims; media in Ukraine said the same thing — these are just a few examples). After the massacre, the killers sang patriotic songs, to show their love for their fatherland. Right Sector thugs rejoyced. Politicians from Svoboda even called for more killings.

dmitry elagin

White supremacy cross drawn by nazis on a wall at the main entrance they torched.


White supremacy cross on fence on the backside of the building.


The Nazis left behind their signatures: the destroyed House of the Trade Unions was covered in Wolfsangel and white supremacy crosses (pseudo-swastikas). By some self-inflicted blindness, the Western reporters, who were there, did not see them. The government has not admitted that the Right Sector were deployed in Odessa, but the Right Sector’s propaganda has done that for them. EuroMaidanPR are the official channels of the Right Sector, and by some of their postings they officially admitted — “EuroMaidan people save separatists from fire” – that they were in Odessa at the burning of the Trade Union building. In another video, they posted, a ”pro-Ukrainian activist” which is one of the captains of the Right Sector squads: in the video linked he is reporting the situation in Odessa — he’s name is Mykola. What he says is the same as it was published by most mainstream media in the West. (He’s the link between the security officials in Kyiv and the Odessa massacre, we’ll discuss this below).







The people butchered and torched inside the building were killed by the law enforcement Nazi thugs of the Kyiv government. It’s not we who call them ”law enforcers” – but Yulia Tymoshenko, Barack Obama and other politicians from Kyiv. These law enforcers and patriots were presented mostly as ultras from Kharkov. Is this how the Neo-Nazis have been colonizing the cities – like they do now with state power positions – up to the point where ultras become their political armies?

On the same day that ultras, controlled and guided by Neo-nazis, went to Odessa to send a message of ”peace and security” (as the current prime-minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, explained the military invasion in the industrial East), the Kyiv government has sent an army with tanks and helicopters to invade and quell a rebellion. In the industrial East, people have been protesting after the new Kyiv ruling power imposed its oligarchs as their local governors. It’s in Kyiv where you hear ruling party politicians calling for the extermination of the population of the east – because they are Russian – it’s there where businessmen go on the stage of the EuroMaidan (March 10, 2014) and demand that the ”Russians” be shot in the head. It’s there where schoolchildren are indoctrinated to jump and shout: ”Kill the Moskali” (derogatory term for Russians).

On May 2, 2014, Odessites were trapped inside the Trade Union building, and executed with guns (gun fire can be heard very clearly, at 2:24), or beaten to death, or burned alive. Here, at 4:54, there is blood on the floor, proof that a person was beaten to death. Here, at time code 6:02, a person has just been killed, laying on a pool of blood. Here in another graphic video, a pile of dead bodies is filmed inside the building – all of them residents of Ukraine. Bodies are covered in blood, which means they were beaten to death. Here, there are other bodies. They found no Russian ID: at time code 43:56 in the video, they say that ID belongs to a student from Ukraine, one of the victims. In the same video, there are other bodies, some look like they could have been tortured: the blood and the cable at 45:18, and another dead man at 45:34. There are many others – who were not killed by fire or bullets, or smoke, but murdered. It seems that not all jumped from the windows, some were thrown out the windows. The burned body of a woman was found in a position that suggests she might have been raped.

[The most common accusation from Kyiv against people in Odessa is that the Russian side are Russians: “Something strongly denied by them, see them explaining why in interviews before the massacre, here.]


People from Odessa protesting the massacre.



People in Russia mourning and laying flowers at the Ukrainian embassy.

AFP Photo / Anatoly Stepanov

Odessa, 9 days after the massacre. Pic from AFP/Anatoly Stepanov

Initially, the government in Kyiv said people in the building died from the smoke caused by the fire in front of the building (a lie), or that they set themselves on fire inside the building (a lie). Later, the government in Kyiv admitted just what was way too obvious to deny anymore: that 6 people were shot dead, and they claim that 32 were killed by smoke and some gas, and that 10 ”have jumped” from the windows to escape fire. 7 women and a minor (initially they denied there were children in the building) were among the 46 killed people the official death toll of the Odessa massacre. They still have not identified 3 bodies. All those killed were from Odessa and two other localities in Ukraine. Initially, the government claimed they were „Russians from Crimea or Transdniester” clashing with “the peaceful ultras“, when in fact there were are images filmed (here, at 1:22:53) that actually prove that those participating in the killings at the Kulikovo building were part of two new battalions of the National Guard (Right Sector), stationed in Dnepropetrovsk and Odessa, and probably plain clothes policeEven the Unites States’ ambassador said they have no proof that Russia was involved at Odessa. Witness say however the death tool could be much bigger (some speak of 116 people).

What the government still does not admit is what can be seen on the images filmed during the massacre: some people, fallen on the ground from the building on flames, have been beaten to death afterwards (here, at 2:30 and 2:45). Some were beaten to death inside the building. On all the images posted on the internet you can hear gunshots. The government admits they found two pistols inside the building, Molotov cocktails and cans containing residues of flammable substance, and many types of weapons. Among the weapons filmed were machete – the pro-government supporters slashed off the leg of a man on the streets of Odessa (here, at time code 1:00 and 2:28), before the massacre. There is another video with a woman – anti-government – captured by the pro-government supporters on the backside alley of the building right when they invaded and surrounded the House of the Trade Unions. A man in white shirt, (here, at time code 0:21) behind her, is holding a machete – the woman is paralyzed by fear. The cameraman probably saved her life.

In another video, filmed in the back of the building on fire, a girl and another woman scream inside the burning building (at 22.48 and 23.48). The entire video, which is graphic, is translated here. This time, the screams lasted longer and the crowd started to chant to cover up the agony breaking through the walls of fire: ”Glory to Ukraine!” ”Glory to her heroes!” This chant was inherited from the Nazis of Bandera, who in the ’40s tortured and killed Ukrainians, Poles and Jews and who today they are praised as ”national heroes” or nationalists (the photos published here are graphic, they show the victims of Stepan Bandera’s nazis – Ukrainians, Poles and Jews – being tortured, raped, and killed). In the ’80s, Reagan’s administration started the rehabilitation of the Nazis in Eastern Europe, Ukraine too. Bandera was transformed from a Nazi killer – who massacred people, in ways that shocked even Hitler’s army – into a national hero. He also colonized the police, just like Right Sector does these days, (see excerpt from the study on OUN-B at the end of the blog).
[“The leader of the Svoboda party went to Germany to protest the prosecution of John Demjanjuk, who was the Ukrainian who was settled in the United States who was implicated as a concentration camp guard in the killing of innocent people. The German courts found him guilty, and the Svoboda leadership went to Germany to complain about convicting this guy. The reason? They said they didn’t want any Ukrainians tainted with it, because they live a lie: that no Ukrainian had anything to do with the German Nazi regime, when history betrays them, and their own affiliations betray them. But they don’t like that being out there publicly, so they always protest the innocence of any Ukrainian being charged with anything, regardless of what the evidence is.” Source]

Svoboda’s current leader and Parubiy when they founded their first nazi party back in 1991. Source


Current prime-minister of Ukraine, Fatherland’s Yatsenyuk and Svoboda’s leader at a 2009 Svoboda Congress.


An official poster of Svoboda.


Vitali Klitschko, whose party has been fabricated by Merkel’s CDU, has been elected Mayor of Kyiv. Pic shows him comforting a Neo-nazi at the EuroMaidan.

revolutionary HQs

HQs of the “revolution” back in December 2013 in Kyiv. Portrait shows Stepan Bandera, a nazi turned national hero.

Andriy Parubiy

Andriy Parubiy on the scene at EuroMaidan, next to the soon to be interim president, one of Tymoshenko’s lieutenants.


Current Prime-Minister and Svoboda leader on the scene of EuroMaidan, behind them is the portray of Taras Shevchenko.

Andriy Parubiy and the deputy secretary general of NATO, Alexander Vershbow. Source

The staunchest supporter of this “denazification” (the normalization of Nazism) is today the boss of the secret services, and police and army forces in Ukraine – Andriy Parubiy. Parubiy was a co-founder of a nazi party in 1991, which now is called Svoboda. Nowadays he is a member of the Tymoshenko’s Fatherland, the main current ruling party in Kyiv. Parubiy was the commandant of Euromaidan, which led to the reshuffle of those in power in Kyiv – he was the coordinator of the “volunteer security corps” in Kyiv.

Marching for a massacre

Who were the people the Neo-nazis massacred inside the trade union building? ”Terrorists” (according to the Right Sector Neo-nazis’s official channel), ”separatists” (as the interior minister wrote on his Facebook page) and ”pro-Russian militants” (according to the Western media), ”Russians”, acording to Ukraine’ secret service, SBU. Later, the government had to admit they were all residents of Ukraine.

One of the first pictures of the massacre which was published on the internet was that of a pregnant woman seemingly dead, suspended over a desk. It was presented as the woman whose agonizing screams are heard on the video. But forensics denied there was a pregnant woman among the dead. Media immediately reported the story was fake implying the screams of the woman being murdered were fake too; they are not at all since the witnesses confirm them when they insult the victim.

From the building the police sealed for two days, bodies were still missing. Even media in Ukraine – which is mostly pro-Kyiv government -reported that 48 people are still missing from the Odessa “fire” (they don’t call it a massacre). Forensics also denied there were children among the dead, though two boys were filmed alive, inside the building, together with their mother, at a window of the first floor, before the Nazis torched it (in this video, time code 1:12:38- 1:12:41). Another woman who survived the massacre saw them alive in the room that was later torched. Forced to acknowledge their existence, the officials admitted they were among the wounded in the hospital. The parents of a 17 year old boy helplessly watched their son burning alive inside the building.

The official death toll so far is of 46 killed, witnesses say actually 116 people were murdered in the massacre inside the building. The Western mainstream media reported exclusively the governments’ official story.

Before they got to Odessa on May 2, 2014, the “peacefulultras from Kharkov staged some real riots in their home town, and did some training for their march for Ukraine’s unity.

They don’t need much “provocation” to go beat people senselessly – just the sight of a red flag or a St.George ribbon at the hand of a person in some car will do.

These are “the peaceful ultras” who marched for Unity of Ukraine in Odessa on May 2, 2014, and clashed with their political rivals in Odessa. Nobody attacked them in Kharkov, they were the ones who beat people up, just like they did in Odessa too, when there were no clashes. The images from Kharkov are important because they show that Right Sector already has access to a force they can use however they want to control their position within the state apparatus. Like they did during the EuroMaidan, but now it’s on a much bigger scale: all over Ukraine. These images also expose some details which will be important in the context of the Odessa clashes that preceded the massacre they committed inside the Trade Union building: they don’t wear any armbands in Kharkov.

On May 2, in Odessa there were two clashes after a football game (Chernomorets Odessa/Metalist Kharkov), which happened when the ultras marched for “the unity of Ukraine.” They were some 1,500. At some point some 300 anti-government protestors (some say 100), of which some were wearing red-armbands, attacked them, or better said, the red armbands did. Only those wearing red-armbands were let by the police to go through to attack “the peaceful ultras.” The pro-Kyiv ultras were wearing armbands too. How did they know to do that, if they only wanted to have their march and no intention to be identifiable from their enemies? During the clashes, 7 people were killed – some by shots. The government propaganda claimed that only “ultras” were killed. It is not so, 3 from the side of the anti-Kyiv protestors were also killed.



“Pro-Russian” separatists firing behind the police lines during the clashes.


“Pro-Russian” separatists wearing red armband and St.George ribbon.


“Pro-Russian separatists” and police red armband during the clashes with the “peaceful” ultras.

After the clashes, the pro-Kyiv ultras and National Guard (the new para-statal force Right Sector gets incorporated into) invaded the Kulikovo square, where the anti-Kyiv activists have organized an encampment. They call their movement “anti-maidan,” and media in Odessa and some say among them there are reactionaries, and “pro-Kremlin supporters or fascists.” Anyway, some of them, about 40, were sleeping in the tents they set up in front of the House of the Trade Union. But all the other people were residents from Odessa who were coming at the camp, mostly to socialize. The fact that they existed was annoying for the Radio Free Europe correspondent who expressed her shock that people were allowed to set up tents at the Kulikovo square (tents in the Independence square in Kyiv were there until the end of May).

The ultras say the massacre just happened – but it is not so, the Right Sector were among them, and later their avatars from the National Guard were sent in; they prepared in advance the Molotovs; attacked a firefighter truck, beat the driver up, and dismantled the equipment.

They attacked some of the anti-Kyiv protestors and other people from Odessa, who were at the encampment, who retreated inside the Trade Union building. Some say that among the people at the encampment were stooges who told them to go inside the building, while a local deputy – who was killed in the massacre – kept yelling at women and children to run away, and not go inside the building. Some anti-Kyiv activists had heard rumors that the government was preparing to destroy their encampment on May Day, but they say they wanted to protect it and that they never thought they would be killed:

“According to Tetiana, there had been rumors going around for several days of an attack on the camp on May 2 by pro-government forces. The young men there said they would stay and defend it to the last. “The young ones said ‘We’re not leaving, we’ll be a memorial to the fact that Odessa will never be a fascist city,’” Tetiana said. “We wanted to help them; we thought if adults were there too it would be safer. It never occurred to us that they would kill us.”” Source

They realized that as the Right Sector and the ultras were invading the building, where they already took refuge, and when they saw others, who had been captured, beaten brutally. The pro-Kyiv stooges can be easily identified as they wear red-armbands. They are the ones who were allowed to break the police chain during the earlier clashes to attack the ultras, they were filmed entertaining with the police chief from Odessa, and being given orders by some hotshot from Kyiv. There are also pictures with them on the roof, next to some Molotovs, and one of them in a light jacket with a shield is photographed behind the barricades at the main entrance of the building. During the massacre and during the fire, pro-Kyiv thugs can be seen and heard firing and beating people up, inside the building. This means they controlled the entries into the building.

After it was done, the survivors were arrested by the police, while their attackers were praised and the new chief of Odessa police even met them when they came to demand from him explanations about why some 70 of the survivors were set free two days later. On May 4th, the families of those arrested stormed the police station, releasing them.

From what the survivors say the massacre inside the building lasted about 2 hours, with the police being present outside the building, and the firefighters saying they were blocked on their way by the Right Sector – there is a video proving that this is the case with at least one firetruck.

The massacre was at first presented by the government as “a fire” which they – and the mainstream media – blamed on the victims inside the building. Later evidence forced the government to say that “they don’t know what started the fire.” Then, the government blamed “the fire” on some strange substance. They want to call the massacre committed inside the Trade Union building “a terrorist attack,” as Petro Poroshenko and Andriy Parubiy have claimed. They claim this substance is the reason people died so suddenly inside the building – just not to utter a single word that they were shot, beaten to death, strangled and burned alive by their supporters. If a strange substance was used, it was probably done by their supporters to cover up the bullet wounds. While they “investigated” this substance, the government ”investigators” were not capable of counting how many Molotovs their supporters threw into and at the building to set it on fire, after and while some of them were murdering people inside.

Here you can see them entering the building BEFORE they set it on fire; here you can see them trying to smash a door behind which people have barricaded; and here you can see them holding clubs in their hands and entering a room from where a woman is shouting at them, then she stops.

The Kyiv government simply refuses to admit that their supporters – Nazis from Right Sector a.k.a. para-statal National Guard, financed from private funding – shot people inside the building and beat them to death, before they set the fire to cover up their crimes.

The Nazis: “Let’s save the bullets!”

A witness, who survived and was arrested, explained that they were told that on May Day their encampment in Kulikovo square would be destroyed. She too says that the people who were massacred inside the building were from Odessa. There is another woman who survived, and she talks about some anti-Kyiv government men from Odessa, equipped with sticks, no fire weapons. She too says that the Molotovs were thrown from outside, that they did not set themselves on fire, like the government and the mainstream media later said. This is her testimony of what happened while she was inside the building.

She was hiding in a room with with three other women and about twelve men when the Nazis attacked them. Two men were already dead, in another room. The men brought their bodies into their room, hoping they could still be saved. But it was too late. They managed to block the door with cupboards and chests and held the door for about 20 minutes. During this time, the barricaded 16 people heard shots in the hallway. Then someone punched the door and asked them to let them in, lying that they were pro-autonomy (anti-Kyiv government) activists. After some deliberation, they decided to crack the door open just to see if this was so. Then, the Right Sector started to attack the door with clubs. The woman looked one of the thugs in the eyes. He was wearing a black mask. He pointed a gun at her and fired, then told the others laughing: “I killed a Colorado!” (Colorado beetle is what the Nazis are calling the anti-Kyiv government people, and not just because the colors of their ribbon, but because see them as bugs to be crushed). But he missed, the bullet did not hit the woman. Then, the thugs threw teargas grenades in their room and they could hold the door just for some minutes. “They managed to break the door and entered the room. Then they immediately shot all men, and those they could not kill on the spot, they beat to death. They said: “Let’s save the bullets.” “These beasts were beating even the two men who were already dead, although the women were screaming to stop that they were not alive.” Then they heard them say they must take the bodies to the basement. The women begged for mercy. The witness told them she had a little child. The Nazis interrogated her for about 15 minutes. They demanded that “she told the truth: that she was Russian.” But she showed them a Ukrainian passport and her residence was Odessa. The women were taken out on the hallway. They saw many bodies, everywhere, even on the stairs. Some nazis were dragging the dead towards the basement. She said many disappeared.

Then they grabbed one of the four women and shoved her into a room. The witness could hear her scream… and then nothing. She said she caught a moment where they were busy, and escaped from the building. Outside she already saw the firefighters and the police. The fire brigade arrived after an hour and a half, though their station is straight across the Trade Union building. And then this woman says: “All Ukrainian politicians in Kyiv praised the massacre.”

A pro-Kyiv government paper published the testimonies of two other witnesses who never mentioned the gun fires, which can be heard on all videos.

How to cover up a massacre

The first information about the massacre in Odessa represented the first official version of the governments story: it said almost nothing about the massacre (what they call “a fire”), and a lot about clashes between ultras and anti-Kyiv activists (about which there is information that they are very reactionary). In spite of the fact that evidence, which totally blew it away, was constantly popping up on the internet – from witnesses and people who filmed outside and inside the building – the mainstream media continued to back up the government’s story. This is an interesting account which says that “both sides set the building on fire” (but the nazis are filmed constantly throwing Molotovs inside the building) and that “the anti-maidan” activists were not the “leftists” imagined by the West, but actually reactionaries and fascists; they also say that indeed the “ultras” march was attacked by “the anti-maidan activists,” which allows them to them rationalize and justify the massacre. These accounts totally ignore any responsibility on behalf of the nazis supported by the Kyiv government, who were the ones who committed the massacre and who are walking free. They were not all “peaceful ultras,” as the accounts say, but they geared up ready to fight, and they also had weapons because they did shoot people inside the Trade Union building, before they set it on fire.

This is what the government said, and the mainstream media repeated without doubts, that happened on May 2, 2014 in Odessa – see here, here, here, and here, while they constantly attempted to whitewash the nazis- :

There was a football match. Pro-government ultras (most of them from Kharkov) and and pro-Russian separatists (as the government and the media defined them) clashed. The ultras set off to march “for the unity of Ukraine.” Being such good ultras, they came equipped to fight, with shields and all that. The pro-Russian separatists came all geared up too. The pro-Russian separatists attacked the good pro-government ultras. There were two fights taking place about the same time, in different places downtown Odessa.

The police are seen protecting the pro-Russian separatists – wearing distinctive red armbands – who shoot automatic riffles from behind the police lines.

There are some snipers too: before they fire, they throw stones at their victims so they can be very well seen and filmed. It seems like these snipers do everything possible to be seen. Of course, they all wear red armbands – the identification sign of the pro-Russian separatists.

These armbands are important because they prove that both sides were previously organized, so there was nothing spontaneous about it, like the people who later attacked the Kulikova camp pretend. How the bad pro-Russian separatists knew to wear armbands, just like the good pro-Kyiv government ultras? Could it be because there was one entity which organized both groups? Why the red armbands and not just St. George Ribbon, which is what the anti-Kyiv supporters wear? Some cops also wear red armbands, so that later police could be singled out and blamed for the whole thing. Conveniently enough, the red armband wearing bad guys are seen collaborating with the police. But the pro-Kyiv ultras get instructions too in front of a police station: in this video at 9:12 a security man enters a police station, while somebody who seems like some nazi captain is lecturing the fighters in front of the police.

A high police official – supposedly against the bad pro-Russian separatists – is filmed giving instructions to the red armband wearing pro-Russian separatists, so “they don’t mess up their tasks”:

– You have to clearly understand which troop undertakes what task. That’s why, you, see, we always have problems.

Like with the snipers coordinated by Parubiy, when some of them fired upon protestors back in February Kyiv – that sort of “problems”? (see here at 3:00) Or like the EuroMaidan coordinator shouting from the mic on the stage at the EuroMaidan: “Guys, don’t shoot each other in the back! Pay attention!” – that sort of “problem”? (see here at 5.30)


There were Nazis in Odessa, organizing people: this video shows one of them at 6:22, when he emerged from a street and behind him some cops appeared. Then again at 7:24 he is organizing people. The armband he wears proves he is from the Youth Nationalist Congress – some of the most brutal para-statal nazi squads – who also made up the 14th sotni (or sotnya which means 100, this is how the self-defenses groups coordinated by Parubiy were organized at the Euromaidan). This proves that the 14th sotni were in Odessa – and it is important because the sotni‘s supreme commander was Parubiy, currently the hotshot in the Kyiv security apparatus.

Of course, the government later came up with all sorts of stories to justify why the chief of police from Odessa went missing just in time – they claim he fled the country: quite convenient, the cop who was supposed to be responsible escaped the country just in time. The government says a bus full of bad Russians from Transdniester and Crimea had been stopped before entering Odessa, but some “high official in the police” ordered it released, so they could get into the city. But they have no proof, it’s just because they say so. Before the government said it was a train which arrived with bad “Russians” from Transdniester and Crimea. There also emerged a very bizarre video with some pissed off cops throwing their shields on the ground and leaving. “They got called somewhere else,” was the official explanation. There are lots of other videos that show cops running away in their cars when people are calling for them after somebody got shot next to the group of people wearing red armbands. 

These clashes were reported in detail by the Western mainstream media; they avoided to do the same with the massacre inside the Trade Union building in Odessa. This report is a good example of how the governments’ story gets propagated.

Nazis doing some law enforcement 

The story of the clashes was disseminated by the government like an excuse, a justification, a rationalization and even an endorsement of the massacre committed by the Nazis inside the Trade Union Building.

This video, which was edited, shows in part what happened – it’s the largest view of the massacre taking place.

At 1:04, you see that the entrance is protected by an extended roof: if Molotovs had been thrown from the roof – where an improvised device was later filmed – they would have had to defy physics laws and make a curve in the opposite direction of the fall, a U-turn, so they could get inside. That exposes another lie told by the government: that the building was set on fire by Molotovs thrown from the roof.

Then there’s the smoke. Initially, government claimed that most people in the building that died suffocated from the smoke. Forensics confirmed it. The first official statements claimed the cause of death was the smoke from the encampment, set on fire in front of the building. Images prove that the huge column of smoke 20-30 meters high was taken by the wind exactly in the opposite direction of the building: see images from 1:16 to 1:29. That means the wind is contradicting the government.


When the anti-Kyiv people were just outside the front of the entrance, the Right Sector were not going towards them either, even though the anti-Kyiv crowd outnumbered them by 1 to 30, or more. Behind the barricades set up on the main entrance stairs, there are just some 20 people. Many more are already inside the building.


Someone who could not make it to the building is beaten right before they set the encampment on fire.

At this point in time, the people inside the building were already aware that something bad was going to happen to them. Why did they not escape using the other entries – there are at least 2 other, one on the right side, another one in the back of the building. As others images prove, they tried but could not escape, because the entries were already captured by the Right Sector. Here, at minute 8, Right Sector enter the building, at 8:10 some run to the backside of the building, here 8:26, it’s proof people trapped tried to escape, the Neo-nazis shout:

They are escaping! Run to the backyard!

These people from Odessa were intentionally trapped inside the building. Images show Right Sector attackers yelling at each other to go guard all entries so “the Russians” don’t escape. In this video, at 1:20, the Right Sector encourage each other:

Burn them to hell!”

At 2:15, they yell: “Death to Russians!

Then, “Hang the Russians! Hang the Russians!” “Hang the Communists!

 At 1:32 on the aerial recording shows a moment captured on other videos where there is heard a huge turmoil and lots of gun fire – the ultras in front of the building get scared: they start to run away from the building. They don’t run because of Molotovs being thrown at them. If they got so scared, you can imagine the brutality of what was happening inside the building.

After that, it’s clear that the video has been cut several times. This is important because these are the only aerial images, and they were released with a text which endorses the government’s version, “that an arson attack happened,” and that the government supporters were “attacked with fire-guns by the rivals in favor of stronger ties with Russia.” The text also implies that the people trapped inside accidentally died from the smoke, that it was “a chaos,” which is an attempt to excuse the Right Sector of any intent. It also quotes the first government version of the events: people died from the smoke and jumped from the building. This version is implicitly asserting that the Right Sector were the victims.

The aerial video, though cut, proves the contrary:

– at 2:02 a fire breaks inside the second room from the right at the third floor, flames are up to the roof of the 4-5 meters high room. A Ukrainian channel actually cut these frames and edited them to prove that the people inside the building set themselves on fire. A lie. On the aerial recording, frames after the fire inside the room breaks out, an object hits the air-conditioner below the window. The intention was clear to create the impression that the people inside the building set the room on fire, because the recording is edited so that the bottle goes unnoticed (you can see that if you look frame by frame), the cut is visible.

– at 2:22 more people come from the lateral streets.

– at 2:25 a Molotov hits a room on the right side of the building, while on the entrance stairs which are continuously pelted with Molotovs there are pro-government supporters. Two of them (one in blue and one in black) are seen waving at people in the square to call them inside the building. One door is already burning. No firefighters are seen. No police.

– at 2:31 a person is seen on the roof, holding a bat and walking on the back side.

– at 2:41 a person runs towards the entrance of the building holding a Molotov with the intent to throw it inside.

– at 2:41 another Molotov has been thrown in the upper right side of the images recorded. Then, before the Molotov can be seen landing, the video is suddenly cut – this shows a failed attempt to hide facts.

– at 2:55 riot police can be seen walking in, like nothing weird was happening around them. It’s almost a friendly walk.

– then at 3:14 the lights of a firetruck are seen. They get to actually do something an hour or so later.

– at 3:43, two people can be seen on the roof. The angle these images are filmed from gives the impression that the building was engulfed in fire, but that wall of smoke was created by the fire set up in front of the building and the wind is directing it away from the building.

What does all of this indicate?

That the intent is to fabricate a story, and the Right Sector attackers were let to massacre their victims. The political reactions regarding this massacre prove that it was meant to instill terror into the hearts and minds of the Odessites. The massacre also carries a symbolic message for the left: in Odessa they set the second Trade Union building on fire. The first one was in Kyiv (of course, they blamed the police of the former president, but it’s interesting that the fire started exactly where the Right Sector had its offices during the EuroMaidan. On their door they had written: Nazis only. Destroying the unions is what Nazis have always done, we don’t call them capitalists’ thugs for nothing.

The massacre inside at Odessa was also meant to send another message: “the purity” of the nation does not tolerate the cosmopolitan society of Odessa.

After the massacre, the police sealed the building for two days, for “investigations.” But just hours later, they did not need one. The interior ministry officials already knew that among the dead there were at least 15 Russians citizens and a few from Transdniester. This corresponded to the official story they already disseminated, during the previous clashes between “the ultras.” This proved to be a lie. The dead were all from Odessa. Later the government said “the separatists” from Russia and Transdniester were among those “arrested.” So, the Kyiv government turned to blame the police, and accused them of “selling themselves.” The ministry of interior from Kyiv got mad not that the police arrested wounded people – survivors of the massacre, that they kept them without to ask them anything more than 70 hours, but that the police let them go, when the police station was stormed by their relatives from Odessa. The ministry of interior was not mad that the police simply acted invisible during the massacre inside the Trade Union building, but that they let the survivors get out of the police arrest.

There is also another surreal scene caught on tape – police and other hotshots from the government probably having a nice and calm conversation on the backside alley in front of the burning building, while people were falling on the ground.

Nazi Police “investigating” their own

The Neo-nazis, who increasingly control and colonize law enforcement and military state structures, seem to be going after the victims, not the aggressors. ”The investigation” seems to be heading towards an official confirmation of the already disseminated government propaganda, in spite of all evidence that show that the real aggressors were on the side of the government, and that the moral responsibility is that of the ruling politicians in Kyiv.

What kind of investigation is that? On May 4th (2 days after the killings) the new police chief in Odessa, Igor Katerinchuk, endorsed the massacre in front of a Right Sector crowd, telling them implicitly that they did good because “separatism is illegal, and so it’s the (separatist) propaganda.” Basically the police chief in Odessa told the Right Sector that they applied the law when they butchered Odessites inside the trade union building. Perhaps an involuntary acknowledgment of the fact that Right Sector attacked people solely for political opinions. Among the crowd were the killers of the people inside the trade union building, who were likely pissed that the families of the survivors managed to take them out from the police station hours earlier (this event too, unlike the massacre inside at Kulikovo, was widely reported by the Western mainstream media).

The most important players involved in the investigation are the same ones involved in the military occupation in the East.

One is the boss of Ukraine’s secret service (SBU), Valentin Nalyvaychenko. He has been working with Right Sector. You can see him in this video preaching at one of the training camps of the Neo-nazis, dressed like a modern monk and saluting them with “Glory to Jesus Christ.” He is introduced by the Rambo wannabe Yarosh. SBU’s boss starts preaching patriotism indoctrination at time code 2:26. This is what he tells the future holy warriors – the meeting took place before the EuroMaidan:

Yarosh speaking: Glory to Ukraine! Dear friends, it is becoming a tradition that our camp is visited by guests and now a man who has been closely working with our organization throughout the year came to visit us. He is a public and political figure, former head of SBU, and I mean the TRUE head of SBU, Valentin Nalivaychenko, accompanied by his fellow friends. Please, come by closer. Mr. Valentin, welcome.
Valentin Nalyvaychenko, SBU boss, speaking: “Glory to Jesus Christ (fighters repeat after him: “Glory to Jesus Christ! Glory to Ukraine!”). Dear Tridenters (“Trident” is the name of this group), first of all I would like to express my immense support to the what you are doing. We all live in the Dark Age, the time of a complete lack of faith, and, in fact, the time of foreign occupation (he means Soviet Union, which is gone). But this is only making us stronger, and I mean by that our understanding of what should and what must be done to oppose to the occupants. Occupants (that is, Russians) can only be opposed by our own force, by the power of our own thought, by our own power of will, our faith, our state position, but cohesive and well-organized, capable of acting position. Occupation had already taken place here in the past (thanks for this opportunity, he adds), and now it has obtained the forms by which we can observe that the regime of Yanukovych has finally stepped over the line, grading the official language, continuing to embezzle state budget. The power has proclaimed itself beyond the people, beyond the law, promoted out-of-Ukraine language and neglected our own religion and culture. We understand what to do, we understand that the power plays with language law like a monkey holding a grenade. We understand that we can and we must oppose them with cohesive action, Ukrainian action, because patriotism for us is action. Parliamentary elections have proven our ability, – first of all driven by youth-nationalist congress, “State’s rejuvenation”, “Ukrainian business” and other organizations alike to show how non-party young people can join together to act. I support such unions by all means. I strongly support such action. Our goal is to achieve that on these elections, Ukrainian Front arises. A front of real Ukrainian organizations. Those patriots who know what to do and how, who can say and do what they have said, the Ukrainian thing. I call you up to continue to believe in we are doing together, in our common affair, what we are fighting for. This is our land and our values. We are fighting for Ukraine, we are fighting for a free Ukraine, for our faith, faith in God, belief that we are standing on our own land and that we will make order in our house by ourselves. With these words I would like to finish my speech and hand in the certificate to your organization. Glory to Ukraine!
Yarosh speaking: From our part (says the commander of Trident to Nalivaychenko) we would like to present you with this T-shirt with the portrait of Stepan Bandera (well-known Ukrainian terrorist, murderer and Nazi-collaborator during WWII).
Valentin Nalyvaychenko, SBU boss, speaking: This is an honor for me!”

Dmitry Yarosh – has he ever worked in his life? – is the deputy of Andriy Parubiy, the boss of the statal umbrella organizations of the police, army and secret services in Ukraine, called the National Security and Defense Council. They worked together at the EuroMaidan, and were named in state positions by the current minister of interior, four days after the power reshuffle in Kyiv back in February. After they took power, the western-backed fascist dominated coalition in Kyiv created a para-military, para-statal National Guard where they incorporate their Right Sector fighters and other Nazis to “defend the fatherland” from an imaginary war with Russia.

Parubiy’s present is profoundly related to his past: in the ’90s he was the co-founder of a replica of Hitler’s party, which later was transformed into today’s Svoboda, and he was the boss of this party’s para-military wing, the Patriots of Ukraine. Today he is a member of Fatherland. He maintained close relations with far right FN’s Jean-Marie Le Pen, as well as with other Western elites, which makes him probably such a trustable person for NATO. Since early March, he has constantly declared that they are at war with Russia. He already demanded that NATO “help” Ukraine. These pictures, printed by a Neo-nazi magazine from Ukraine, had been originally published in a 1999 book written by Parubiy. Source

He was and remains one of the most fanatic ideological supporter of Stepan Bandera, and he demanded the European Parliament back off when they were enraged Bandera was turned into a national hero. He was the commandant of Euromaidan, which led to the reshuffle of the guys in power in Kyiv – he coordinated the street fighters.

Parubiy at a Neo-nazi march in the ’90s. Source

5 days after Yarosh moved his HQ to the east, on April 29, Parubiy was in Odessa on ”a working visit.” He visited a military unit and ”the self-defense units” (Right Sector), who had moved about the same time in eastern Ukraine with their boss Dmitry Yarosh: ”The Secretary of the NSDC of Ukraine met with the Ministry of Internal Affairs Battalion “Storm” formed with volunteers from Odessa. Andriy Parubiy also emphasized the importance of participation of community in the protection of its Motherland. “Now it is very important the participation of the community. There is success where the active rise of people is,” the Secretary of the NSDC of Ukraine said.” Source

He met a captain of the Neo-nazi squads, Mykola. He gave them some equipment – dozens of bullet proof vests – how did he knew they would need them?

On May 2, Mykola was filmed, shooting at people inside the burning trade union building – you can see him firing, in this video at time code 0:10, or in this video at time code 1:45:47). At the beginning of this video – where Mykola is with other Right Sector, being assisted by the local police chief, who later disappeared – somebody in military outfit – who also met Parubiy on April 29 in Odessa – is ordering the police chief of Odessa:

“- Make a corridor for us, and we’ll take care of the rest.”


Mykola meeting Parubiy in Odessa on April 29, he received equipment from Kyiv, bullet proof vests included.


Mykola inside the police station in Odessa, before the massacre on May 2, 2014.


Right Sector’s Mykola preparing to fire the people trapped inside the while nazis throw Molotovs inside.


Mykola reporting the official story of the Kyiv government while being assisted by other Right Sector and the local police.

RS Ukrainian activist EuroMaidan PR

Right Sector Propaganda calls him “Ukrainian activist” – he is one of them.


Mykola firing real bullets at people trying to break the windows of the rooms set on fire by the Right Sector. He later lied and said there were no Molotovs thrown at the building.


Mykola speaking to a Right Sector crowd who demanded explanation from the new Odessa police chief, after the survivors from the massacre had been released from the police station by their families.

Odessa TUB _ bullets

Pic taken by the Guardian correspondent inside the trade union building of what resemble bullets being fired.

The version of events in Odessa, prior to the massacre, reported by Mykola in this video is the one that had been disseminated by the media, local correspondents, and some bloggers. The video was posted by the official channel of the Right Sector, where Mykola is presented as “Ukrainian activist.”

Mykola later said he did nothing wrong, that he did not shoot at the people inside the building and that his neo-nazi thugs from Right Sector did not have any Molotov cocktails – it’s just amazing how he does not give a damn that there are tens of videos on the internet showing his thugs throwing Molotovs inside the building – and, of course, “the fire” was started by those throwing Molotovs from the roof of the building. See here at 5:47 Molotovs thrown at the building while Mykola (from time code 6:20 to 6:50) is filmed opening fire – there lots of gunfire heard, inside and outside the building, during the entirety of the footage. During the first 7 minutes of the footage, most of them seem to come from his pistol.

While this nazi pathological liar was firing real bullets at the people inside the burning building, some were trying to help people trapped inside the building – because the people trapped had told them they were from Odessa. The most violent of them, by their accent were from Kharkov, these trying to help seem to be from Odessa. This scene happened almost an hour after the massacre started. The fire station was just a few hundred meters away from the building, but the firemen were not allowed to reach Kulikovo.

Even when they turned ”humanitarian” in front of the recording cameras – helping some people who were already filmed alive, while others were being killed inside the building – one of them – is throwing a Molotov cocktail at the people trapped inside a room at the second floor, but he misses (see here, the seconds from 11:00 to 11:05). At 12:26 and 12:30 it is visible that the person who tried to torch the people in that room was wearing a bullet prof vest under his sport blouse. At 17:00 a firetruck arrives, at 18:36 the firetruck is seen in front of the building, being stopped there. At 17:46, they were still throwing Molotovs at the main entrance.

At 18:08 – just as the Right Sector were writing Nazi symbols on the wall of the building, for the next 10 seconds there can be seen what appears to be gun fire at the 5th window on the first floor. The video is here.

Here, at time code 0:43-0:47, the ”humanitarian nazis”also shout,

“- Let’s burn those motherfuckers right in the building, fucking faggots!”

Nazis killed, Nazis replace the police 

“Our battalions are part of the new territorial defense. We have close contact with the intelligence services and the general staff…. Our revolution will only be completed when we have totally renewed the state,” said Dmitry Yarosh in an interview for Der Spiegel. “Renewing the state,” first by taking control of the armed forces. They mean reconquista and certainly the western governments supporting them know this too well. 

The neo-nazi Parubiy is among the investigators of the Odessa massacre, and he already claimed that ”a strange substance was in that building,” insinuating this is why the fire happened, so they can officially cover up that Right Sector torched the building. But the building was torched by Right Sector who were outside and inside, during the whole massacre. On this video at 6:50 the rooms at the first level of the building are already burning – they were torched by Molotovs thrown either from inside – by the Right Sector, or from outside, through the window. At 6:58 it’s clearly seen that the rooms at the second floor, third floor and forth floor are also burning. Inside the building can be heard explosion, gun fire, and other sounds which indicate there are people attacking others inside the building.

The Neo-nazis used the Odessa massacre to deploy the National Guard (Right Sector) after they had the chief of police play by their music and then got rid of him. Basically, their own forces are making the law in Odessa now, and they replicate this in the entire east. Right Sector is recruiting publicly- their people are paid by business owners – like the ones recorded here. They use “the Russia-scare” to justify the colonization of the power positions in the country. The “self defense armed groups” – the street army during the EuroMaidan – will probably be officially dismantled, but that is because they already have been incorporated into the new police and army forces. Yarosh, however, announced he would keep his own armed group.

[The Right Sector are already evicting the official police, so they can replace them – see here how they collect the data of police agents and probably will use it to purge them. This colonization started 2 days before they took power back in February, if not sooner. In an interview for Time, Yarosh has said he was negotiating separately with Yanukovych’s forces, including his police. This documentary, in Russian, shows the terror his thugs from Right Sector (National Guard) inflict upon the civilian population in the east – locals there call them locusts because all they leave behind is death, destruction and terror. (see here) When 17,000 police from the former regime quit en mass in the east of the country, the new Kyiv government was in shock, and called them “traitors.” But maybe they had good reasons to do it, especially after Odessa.

“But taking part in the democratic process is not part of Yarosh’s strategy. “We are not politicians,” he says in his office, a pack of Lucky Strikes and a walkie-talkie on the table in front of him, while a sentry in a black ski mask and bulletproof vest stands by the door. “We are soldiers of the national revolution.” His entire adult life has been spent waiting for such a revolution to “steer the country in a new direction, one that would make it truly strong, not dependent on either the West or the East.”” Source

This must be repeated: it’s tragic that historians don’t know at least this about how nazis have always worked: they don’t care to be “democratically representative,” they want power by all means. In fact, colonizing police was also how Fuhrer-wannabe-Bandera worked during World War II.

As this 2010 Harvard University (56) study shows (find it here or here or here Katchanovski, see also the notes at the end of the blog): “Historical studies show that many representatives of the OUN and a significant proportion of the UPA members were involved in the Nazi genocide. [… ]The OUN-B and the OUN-M established local police and administration in many regions of Ukraine, particularly in the West, following the German occupation of Ukraine in 1941. […] The local police helped to implement the Nazi genocides of Jews, Ukrainians, Russians, Byelorussians, and Poles by assisting in mass executions. […] A large part of the auxiliary police in Volhynia abandoned their positions on the orders of the OUN-B and helped to create the UPA in the spring of 1943. […] Many top commanders of the UPA were former police commanders in Nazi occupied Ukraine. […]”

After the massacre, the government deployed more of their Nazi Right Sector (a.k.a. National Guard) troops to Odessa. A parallel process is happening with Ukraine’s army: on May 6, the army commander was sacked and replaced with one of their own, and “defense battalions” formed “by volunteers” are created by the Nazi bosses to sideline the army too, first in the industrial east (Donetsk,Lugansk, Dnipropetrovsk). In Odessa too, they do the same: “We are establishing a special army unit of 400 people. Their task would be to quickly restore law and order in the region. The salary is small but we will pay extra from the ‘Patriot’ fund,” Odessa’s former governor was quoted as saying. Para-statal force, just confirmed. No law needed for the law enforcers.

Svoboda politician: “I’d shoot them all”. 

The former governor of Odessa was fired after he said Yulia’s Tymoshenko’s lieutenant in Odessa was involved. Igor Palitsa was appointed new governor of Odessa, and said that he is convinced “the enemy is within.” Tymoshenko  later blamed Russia for the massacre (not many remember that Putin was incredibly pissed off when she was jailed for the 2009 Gazprom deal). She lied that in the clashes between “ultras” “7 people were killed, who stood up for the unity of Ukraine, against war, against the occupation.” But 3 anti-Kyiv protestors were also killed by red armband “ultras” who being organized by high police officials from Kyiv. Andriy Parubiy, boss over security and defense forces in Ukraine, openly blamed Russia too – just because he says so (not many want to see that he himself should be investigated his visit to Odessa’s Right Sector just 3 days prior to the massacre). Ukraine’s Prosecutor General Oleh Makhnitsky said, “The action (in Odessa) was not prepared at some internal level, it was a well-planned and coordinated action in which some authorities’ representatives have taken part.” He probably means Russia, but the officials from Kyiv, whose involvement is filmed are working for Russia? The United States’ ambassador in Kyiv however said there is no proof Russia was involved.

Hours after the massacre, in a press conference with Germany’s Angela Merkel, U.S.’s Obama announced that, “The Ukrainian government had the right and responsibility to uphold law and order within its territory.” This statement means that the government in Kyiv was involved in the massacre.

Yulia Timoshenko thanked the Nazi killers: “I want to say big thanks to all who came and fight in Odessa for our Ukraine.” But they said “the ultras” were in Odessa for a football game, not for any fight so where is this coming from? She continues, “Also I want to tell that all military action that will be released in nearest future will be against any mass meeting of people.” These are exactly the European values people protested for in Kyiv. The nazis “protected an administrative building,” Yulia Tymoshenko said. Indeed, Nazis always “protect” trade union buildings by setting them on fire.

Ukraine’s Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk tried to play human, but failed: “This is not a tragedy only for Odessa. This is a tragedy for all Ukraine.” The un-elected Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk implied that Russia was to blame, but also blamed local police for their “inability to maintain order.” Earlier he blamed the secret services of Ukraine. While attempting to sound human, he covered up the crimes actually. The use of the word “tragedy” implies there was no intent, no killers.

At least 46 people (officially admitted) did not just “die,” they were murdered, that means that other people caused their death. Most died by gun shots, others were beaten to death, at least another woman was seen being taken away alive by Nazis, her screams were heard, other women can be heard screaming, too. It was not “a fire” – like the government and media later said – the building did not simply “catch fire”, a fire did not simply “break out” (there was no invisible hand at work at Kulikovo). The building, with people intentionally trapped in it, was set on fire, and this was not meant to be stopped or prevented by the police. The police did help both sides during the clashes between “ultras” and “separatists.” But it was not this that enraged the minister of interior, but the fact that the local police from Odessa let the survivors go – they were arrested en mass after they were taken from the building. The police let them go after their families from Odessa stormed the police station and set them free.

Svoboda’s Irena Farion expressed her joy at the burning building: ”Devils should burn in hell. Football fans make the best rebels. Bravo!” She later said they should all be killed. Odessa was not tough enough. In Donetsk, she says, they must go to the end:

“We need to get tougher. Excuse me, but I’d simply shoot them all. Listen, the enemy (Donetsk, eastern Ukraine) is on our land. What are we talking about? We should have driven the enemy out of Ukraine as early as in 1654. Today’s reaction is absolutely legitimate. We need stronger measures against them. Our people died. That’s why these alien creatures, who have come to Ukraine, deserve only one thing: they should all be killed.”

Of course, Svoboda and Right Sector do not even hide their beliefs in Lebensraum and “national purity,” but we must never call them Neo-fascists and Neo-nazi, because, you see, the western intelligentsia might have trouble whitewashing them.

Giant middle finger for the war machine

A giant middle finger to the “peace” community in the West, these apologists of the war machine, and especially liberals and elements of the First-World Left who are always the last to see that their purist intellectual detachment is always – always – suspiciously close to empire’s agenda, who watch (and cheerlead!) while the U.S. and its proxies slaughter innocents and thwart the will of the people from Afghanistan to Zaporizhia, a city in southeastern Ukraine. 

The United Nations has exposed itself as an eager and unabashed tool of western supremacy and apologist for the crimes of empire. It will be discarded along with the other detritus of the old world as Unjust, UNequal and UNwilling to break the yoke of the western paradigm. I think the organization is much worse than useless. I actually think this conflict in Ukraine is the death knell for the UN, along with the IMF/EU/NATO and all the other western organizations which act in concert to try to force billions of people to believe that 2 + 2 = 5. They are the problem, and they have no solutions. As it should be, for as Eduardo Galleano gently reminded us, “it would be strange if the remedy should come from the United States, the same place which brings us the disease.” Amid the lies and distortions of a bought-and-sold press and a government propaganda machine, we can still cut through the bullshit and see the hustlers for what they are: pitchmen of a war machine hell bent on selling us more death and destruction. We all have it within us to refuse the pitch.” 

Now people understand that it is not necessary to believe in leaders. We don’t need to believe in any Yanukovich, we don’t need to believe in a Party of Regions. We need to organize ourselves BY ourselves, and to remember our own history, remember our own culture. That is our foundation.” Source


“The OUN-B tried to familiarize Ukrainian society with the fascist and authoritarian idea that the Ukrainian state should be governed and controlled by the OUN and the providnyk, whose body incorporated and symbolized the whole of Ukraine. All other Ukrainian parties and political organizations were perceived as “opportunistic” or obstructive, and were to be opposed and eventually eliminated. The whole of society would be militarized and kept “combat-ready.” The ethnic minorities of Ukraine were treated as potential enemies of the Ukrainian state, especially the Jews in which the OUN-B saw the “hand of the Muscovite-Bolshevik regime.” (42)

It’s not as if the West is not responsible for the anti-Semitic outbursts in Ukraine. After the 2004 Orange revolution, which saw former president Yushchenko using the resurrection of Nazi allies to boost his political career, and shortly after his “humiliating defeat in the first round of elections” (41) he resurrected Stepan Bandera, the “providnyk” (equivalent to the German “Führer” or the Italian “duce”) of the OUN-B (which separated themselves from the OUN because they wanted to follow Nazi Germany):  “The red and black flag symbolizing blood and earth (Blut und Boden) was introduced as the emblem of the OUN-B. It resonated with the racist and nationalistic German ideology that suggested the inseparability of a people and their homeland as well as a natural attraction to “the soil” which took on spiritual and mythological connotations. The OUN-B tried to familiarize Ukrainian society with the fascist and authoritarian idea that the Ukrainian state should be governed and controlled by the OUN and the providnyk, whose body incorporated and symbolized the whole of Ukraine. All other Ukrainian parties and political organizations were perceived as “opportunistic” or obstructive, and were to be opposed and eventually eliminated. The whole of society would be militarized and kept “combat-ready.” The ethnic minorities of Ukraine were treated as potential enemies of the Ukrainian state, especially the Jews in which the OUN-B saw the “hand of the Muscovite-Bolshevik regime.” (42) See more here 

** Excerpt from the study : “Terrorists or National Heroes? Politics of the OUN and the UPA in Ukraine” by Ivan Katchanovski, Ph.D., Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Harvard University: 

“A large part of the auxiliary police in Volhynia abandoned their positions on the orders of the OUN-B and helped to create the UPA in the spring of 1943. The former policemen, who joined the UPA on OUN-B orders, along with former members of auxiliary police units controlled by the OUN-M and by Taras Borovets and incorporated into the UPA, constituted about half of all UPA members in the fall of 1943 (Estimated from Vovk). Many top commanders of the UPA were former police commanders in Nazi occupied Ukraine. For example, Mykola Kovtoniuk (Yakymchuk), the commandant of the Lutsk city police in 1941, an OUN-B leader in the Volyn Region, became the first commander of the “Turiv” Military District of the UPA. (See Sprava 1, Sodol, Ukrainska povstancha armiia, 1943-49. Dovidnyk druhyi 117). Stepan Yanishevsky, a deputy commander of the police in Vinnytsia in 1941-1943, was the acting head of the “Zahrava” Military District in 1944. These two districts, which covered most of Volhynia, were the most important formations in the UPA-North. Omelian Hrabets, the head of the regional police in Rivne in 1941 and the leader of the OUN-B in the Rivne Region in 1941-1942, was the commander of the UPA-South in 1943-1944. (See Kentii, Zbroinyi chyn 237; Sodol, Ukrainska povstancha armiia, 1943-49. Dovidnyk 74, 136).

Local Ukrainian police commanders and members assisted Nazi executioners in implementing the Nazi genocidal policy by rounding Jews and guarding them during mass executions, catching escapees, and guarding Jewish ghettos. For example, senior police commanders and police members, a large proportion of whom later joined the UPA on the order of the OUN-B, served in these capacities in the biggest cities and many small towns of the Volyn Region when mass executions of Jews took place (See Antoniuk 19, 25-26, 34). Estimated numbers of Jews who were executed or killed by other means in these locations from the end of June 1941 to spring 1943 are as follows: 20 thousand in Volodymyr Volynsk, 15 thousand in Lutsk, 15 thousand in Kovel, 3 thousands in Matsiiv, 3 thousands in Torchyn, and 800 in Kolky (Spector 362-364). For instance, Soviet postwar trials of Ukrainian policemen from Schutzmannschaft Battalion 103, which was based in Matsiiv (now Lukiv), and which joined the UPA in spring 1943, reveal that this police unit participated in mass executions of Jews in Matsiiv, Volodymyr Volynsk, and several other towns in the Volyn Region (See Antoniuk 25; Nakonechnyi 13).

The police from these Volhynian towns before defecting to the UPA participated in mass executions in other locations although its specific units are not yet identified in many cases. For example, the police from Lutsk assisted in the Nazi executions of some 4 thousands Jews in Sofiivka in summer and fall of 1942 (Cybulski 67, Nakonechnyi 2003). A significant part of the regional and district police based in Lutsk joined the UPA in spring 1943 (Antoniuk 25-26). In addition, the UPA killed on its own at least a thousand of Jews, who survived the Nazi genocide11 (Himka).

Similarly, the local police was used in guarding and catching Soviet POWs, most of whom were Russians and Ukrainians. For example, the archival police records show that the police in Lutsk under command of Mykola Kovtoniuk (Yakymchuk) and other local OUN-B leaders during summer 1941 handed over Soviet POWs, including Ukrainians, to the German police (Sprava 1). Soviet estimates of the number of Soviet POWs, who perished as a result of the Nazi genocidal policy in POW camps located in these towns in the Volyn Region, are as follows: 25 thousand in Volodymyr Volynsk, 12 thousand in Kovel, and 11 thousand in Lutsk (Dovidnyk 209).

Police from Ratno assisted in mass murder of close to 3000 Ukrainians in the village of Kortelisy and several neighboring villages in the Volyn Region in September 1942 (Olkhovsky). In April 1943, the Ratno police joined the UPA (Antoniuk 25). Similarly, the auxiliary police from Tsuman, most of which later joined the UPA, helped to carry out mass executions of more than 130 residents of the Ukrainian village of Klubochyn and about 50 people in the Polish settlement of Oborky in November 1942 (Sprava 4).

Even though this question has not yet been addressed by specific studies, there is a strong likelihood that the Schutzmannschaft Battalion 201 was involved in implementation of the Nazi genocides of the Jews and the Byelorussians during the war (See Rudling, “The Shukhevych Cult”). Such police units participated in mass executions of Jews and Byelorussians (See Dean; Nakonechnyi; Rudling, “The Shukhevych Cult,” “The Khatyn‟ Massacre”). Many top commanders of the UPA came from this police battalion. For example, the former officers of the Schutzmannschaft Battalion 201 included: Roman Shukhevych, the Supreme commander of the UPA from 1943 to 1950; Oleksander Lutsky, the organizer and the first Commander of the UPA-West, which was based mainly in Galicia, and Vasyl Sydor, the Commander of UPA-West in 1944-1949 (Sodol, Ukrainska povstancha armiia, 1943-49. Dovidnyk).

Many nationalist politicians and historians in Ukraine cite anecdotal accounts of arrests and killings of OUN and UPA leaders by Germans, October 1942 as the date of creation of the UPA, and individual clashes between UPA and German forces as evidence of anti-Nazi activities. However, the analysis of 118 biographies of OUN-B and UPA leaders in Ukraine during World War II shows that at least 46% of them served in top positions in the regional and local police and administration, the Nachtigall and Roland Battalions, the SS Galicia Division, or studied in German-sponsored military and intelligence schools, primarily, in the beginning of World War II. At least 23% of the OUN-B and UPA leaders in Ukraine were in the auxiliary police, Schutzmannschaft Battalion 201, and other police formations, 18% in military and intelligence schools in Germany and Nazi-occupied Poland, 11% in the Nachtigall and Roland Battalions, 8% in the regional and local administration in Ukraine during the Nazi occupation, and 1% in the SS Galicia Division. (Calculated from Sodol, Ukrainska povstancha armiia, 1943-49. Dovidnyk, with use of other biographical sources). The percentage of Nazi collaborators among the OUN-B and UPA leadership is likely to be higher than this estimate since in many cases information concerning their activities in occupied Ukraine and Poland in the beginning of the war is not available.

At the same time, at least 27% of the wartime OUN-B and UPA leaders in Ukraine were arrested or interned at various times by the German security forces, police and other occupational authorities. However, it is striking that all of them, with the exception of Ivan Klymiv, were either released relatively soon or were able to escape, some more than once. (Calculated from Sodol, Ukrainska povstancha armiia, 1943-49. Dovidnyk, with use of other biographical sources). Similarly, Stepan Bandera and the absolute majority of other top leaders of the OUN who were arrested or detained by the Nazis, were not murdered, but were released by the Nazi authorities by the end of the war, in contrast to the majority of Jewish prisoners and Soviet POWs.

President Yushchenko officially commemorated October 1942 as the date of creation of the UPA in order to emphasize its anti-Nazi activity. For example, he personally visited in October 2009 the town of Kolky in the Volyn Region to commemorate the said UPA anniversary and proclaim UPA members, who created the “Kolky Republic,” as national heroes because, according to him and nationalist historians, they liberated a significant part of the Volyn Region from the Nazis in Spring 1943.12 However, historical studies and archival documents show that the Ukrainian Insurgent Army was created by the OUN-B in Volhynia not in October 1942, but in Spring 1943 after the turn of the war, which was brought about by a defeat of the German Army and its allies in the battle of Stalingrad, and after Soviet partisan units moved to Volhynia from Eastern Ukraine (Orhanizatsia). Even though Galicia was the main stronghold of the OUN-B, the formation of the UPA in Galicia begun only in the end of 1943, and it was fully organized only by spring and summer of 1944 shortly before this region came under Soviet control.

Although two small armed units existed in Volhynia since the end of 1942, they were organized by OUN commanders who served in the local police, and their first attack against German forces dates to February of 1943 (Sodol, Ukrainska povstancha armiia, 1943-49. Dovidnyk druhyi 38-39, 76-76). Many of the anti-German attacks attributed to the UPA coincided with the defection of the Ukrainian auxiliary police in Volhynia in March-April 1943. Many locations in Volhynia, in particular, an area around a town of Kolky, came under control of the UPA as a result of the defection of 4-5 thousand out of about 12 thousand Ukrainian policemen in the region. German police forces in Volhynia numbered at that time only about 1.5 thousand (See Motyka 193, 197). Kolky was seized by UPA units without any fight after most of the Kolky police, which participated in mass killings of the local Jewish population, deserted to the UPA, and a small contingent of German gendarmes abandoned the town (Sprava 12). These UPA units were led by Mykola Kovtoniuk and Stepan Koval, who were the former police commanders in Lutsk and became organizers of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army in the Volyn Region after most of Lutsk policemen on their orders deserted to the UPA in March of 1943 (Sodol, Ukrainska povstancha armiia, 1943-49. Dovidnyk druhyi 42-43). Archival police records implicate police units under their command in participation in the Nazi genocidal policy of annihilation of Jews and Slavs among the local population and POWs. (Sprava 1, Sprava 7).

The UPA carried a certain number of military actions against German police and military forces, their allies, and Polish and other collaborators. However, reliable estimates of German casualties as a result of UPA activity are lacking. Many sources imply that thousands of Germans were killed by the UPA (See, for example, Kentii, Ukrainska povstanska armiia 133). Nevertheless, casualty numbers cited for individual battles and skirmishes against German forces are often significantly inflated because the corresponding casualties of the UPA are given as being several dozen times lower. Similarly, reports concerning a killing of General Viktor Lutze by an UPA unit in Volhynia in 1943 are likely to be falsified since German sources list a car accident in Germany as a cause of his death (See Motyka 202-203).

The size of anti-German activity of the UPA and the Bandera faction of the OUN was relatively minor compared to their anti-Soviet activity. For example, at most, 6% of OUN-B and UPA leaders in Ukraine during World War II died as result of German actions. In comparison, 53% of the OUN and UPA leaders in Ukraine perished as result of actions of Soviet security and military forces and their Polish, Czechoslovak, and East German allies. In addition, 19% were arrested by the Soviet and allied governments, and they were executed, died in detention, or received long sentences. Some 12% of the OUN and UPA leaders escaped to the West, where none of them was prosecuted and some of them, such as Mykola Lebed, were used by Western intelligence services, in particular, the CIA, during the Cold War with the Soviet Union (See Breitman, Goda, Naftali, and Wolfe). (Calculated from Sodol, Ukrainska povstancha armiia, 1943-49. Dovidnyk, with use of other biographical sources). The leaders of the OUN-B and the

UPA in Ukraine had several times smaller chances to perish due to German actions and policies than adult Ukrainians. (See Katchanovski, “Politics of Soviet and Nazi Genocides;” Vallin, Mesle, Adamets, and Pyrozhkov).

An analysis of 348 biographies of leaders and members of the Security Service (SB) of the OUN-B in the Volyn Region produces similar results. The SB OUN-B also served as the security service of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army. Only 0.3% of the SB leaders and members in the Volyn Region were killed by German forces, while 0.3% were killed by Polish forces. In comparison, 44% died or were arrested fighting with the Soviet forces, and 2% were executed by the Security Service of the OUN-B. (Calculated from Antoniuk).

Many previous studies explicitly or implicitly attribute mass murder of Poles, Jewish pogroms, and involvement in the Nazi genocide of Jews to Ukrainians or the local Ukrainian population. Ukrainians are regarded as perpetrators of the mass murder or supporters of the OUN, the UPA, and the Ukrainian auxiliary police. (See, for example, Siemaszko and Siemaszko; Spector; Piotrowski). For instance, the Public Opinion Research Center poll found in 2008 that just 5% of Poles attribute “crimes” committed in Volhynia in 1943 to the UPA and Ukrainian nationalists, while 14% blame Ukrainians, and 19% erroneously single out Russians, the Soviet Union, Stalin, and NKVD as the perpetrators.13”

“The issue of political rehabilitation and heroization of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army became one of the central political issues in Ukraine after the “Orange Revolution.” It provoked major political controversies and debates among historians in Ukraine and other countries. President Yushchenko, nationalist parties, and many Ukrainian historians attempted to recast the OUN and the UPA as a popular national liberation movement, which fought both against Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, and to present OUN and UPA leaders as national heroes. They either denied or justified by its pro-independence struggle, the involvement of the OUN and the UPA in terrorism, the Nazi genocide, and the ethnic cleansing.

However, historical studies and archival documents show that the OUN relied on terrorism and collaborated with Nazi Germany in the beginning of World War II. The OUN-B (Stepan Bandera faction) by means of its control over the UPA masterminded a campaign of ethnic cleansing of Poles in Volhynia during the war and mounted an anti-Soviet terror campaign in Western Ukraine after the war. These nationalist organizations, based mostly in Western Ukraine, primarily, in Galicia, were also involved in mass murder of Jews during World War II.

Publications produced by former leaders and members of the OUN and the UPA and their followers in the West, generally, presented these organizations as a movement for independence of Ukraine while omitting or minimizing their participation in the mass murder of Poles, Jews, and Ukrainians (See, for example, Litopys Ukrainskoi Povstanskoi Armii). Similar approaches were adopted by many historians of the OUN and the UPA in post-Soviet Ukraine. They often uncritically relied on documents or memoirs produced by OUN and UPA leaders and members, who had vested interest in presenting positive histories of their organizations. In contrast, Ukrainian, Polish, Jewish, and Russian archival documents and eyewitness accounts that offered a different perspective on the OUN and the UPA were often marginalized or used selectively. (See, for example, Litopys UPA, Serhiichuk; Ukrainska). For instance, the website of the Ukrainian National Memory Institute contains almost exclusively documents, publications, and links concerning the activities the OUN and the UPA that were primarily produced by these organizations or their contemporary supporters.7

After the “Orange Revolution” in 2004, President Viktor Yushchenko and many other nationalist politicians at the national, regional and local levels employed and promoted such uncritical historical approaches in their policy of the political rehabilitation and heroization of the OUN and the UPA. For example, Ihor Yukhnovsky, the acting Director of the Ukrainian National Memory Institute, which was created by Yushchenko‟s order with a status of a central government agency, stated that “a return Stepan Bandera‟s good name on the whole territory of Ukraine” was the main task of this government institute (See Stepan Bandera 10). The Security Service of Ukraine publicized such approaches concerning the OUN and the UPA. For instance, during Yushchenko‟s presidency, Volodymyr Viatrovych, the head of the Center for the Studies of the Liberation Movement in Lviv in Western Ukraine, became the director of the State Archive of the Security Service of Ukraine.

The nationalist politicians and historians in Ukraine presented the OUN and the UPA as a Ukrainian national liberation movement, which started in Western Ukraine with a broad popular support and extended to many other regions of Ukraine. They argued that the OUN-B was forced to collaborate with Nazi Germany not for ideological reasons, but because it was in interest of the pro-independence struggle and that this collaboration effectively ended after the Nazi leadership refused to accept a declaration of the Ukrainian independence by OUN-B leaders in Lviv on June 30, 1941. These politicians and historians emphasized that many OUN-B leaders and ordinary members, including Stepan Bandera, were arrested, imprisoned in concentration camps, or executed by the Nazis. They presented the Ukrainian Insurgent Army as a guerrilla force which included not only ethnic Ukrainians, but also a significant number of minorities, such as Jews, Georgians, and Tatars. The UPA was depicted as a guerrilla army which fought primarily against Soviet and German police and military forces and Soviet and Polish partisans. Mass killings of Polish civilians were either ignored, or justified as retaliatory actions of UPA for the pacification policy of the Polish government before World War II and murders of Ukrainian nationalists in the Chelm region. Similarly, killings of Ukrainian civilians were either dismissed as Soviet propaganda or attributed to “false flag” operations by the Soviet security forces that

misrepresented themselves as UPA units. (See Ukrainska; Marples, Heroes and Villains, “Anti-Soviet Partisans.”)

For instance, President Yushchenko claimed that a half million of Ukrainians fought in the UPA in 1943.8 However, OUN and UPA sources put membership of the UPA at about 25-30 thousand in 1944 when it reached the greatest numerical strength (Sodol, Ukrainska povstancha armiia, 1943-49. Dovidnyk 47). Its membership was much smaller before and after that time. The OUN was most active in Galicia in the 1930s and 1940s. The majority of leaders and members of two factions of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists were from this region of Western Ukraine. Although the UPA was initially established by the OUN-B in Volhynia, most of UPA leaders and members were from Galicia. For example, analysis of 118 biographies of leaders of the UPA and the OUN-B in Ukraine published in Sodol (Ukrainska povstancha armiia, 1943-49. Dovidnyk) shows that 71% of them were from Galicia, 20% from Volhynia, 1% from Bukovyna, 6% from historically Eastern Ukraine, and 2% from other countries or their place of birth was unknown. The data exclude non-OUN and non-UPA members of the Supreme Ukrainian Liberation Council, which was created in the middle of 1944 and played a ceremonial role.9

The analysis of ideology and policy of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, which split into the Bandera faction (OUN-B) and the Melnyk faction (OUN-M) in 1940, primarily because of tactical and leadership differences, shows that it was a semi-totalitarian organization which combined elements of extreme nationalism and fascism (See Motyl). The OUN envisioned a creation of an independent Ukrainian state that was allied with Nazi Germany and run as a dictatorship by OUN leaders. This monoethnic state, similar in many ways to Ustashi Croatia, was supposed to include parts of modern day Russia, Poland, and Byelorussia. The OUN regarded such minorities in Ukraine as Jews, Poles, and Russians, as hostile (See Berkhoff and Carynnyk; Motyka; Rudling, “Theory and Practice”). Although its official ideology abandoned many of the extreme elements since 1943, actual policies of the OUN-B did not change to the same extent. For example, the UPA in 1943 and 1944 undertook an ethnic cleansing campaign against Poles in Volhynia.

The UPA included some units comprised from non-Ukrainians, such as Georgians, Azeries, and Uzbeks. However, these units consisted mainly from former Soviet POWs, who were recruited by Germans and then joined the UPA mostly for instrumental reasons. A very small number of Jews served in the UPA, primarily in such secondary capacities as doctors. Their presence was also motivated primarily by instrumental reasons, since they tried to escape the Nazi genocide while the UPA used them because it needed medical and other such services that could not be provided by Ukrainians. It appears that most of these minorities in the UPA deserted to the Soviet side or were killed by the UPA. (See Diukov; Himka; Motyka; Sodol, Ukrainska povstancha armiia, 1943-49. Dovidnyk).

Both the OUN and the UPA were terrorist organizations because their actions correspond to academic definitions of terrorism as use or a threat of use of violence against civilians by organizations and other non-state actors in order to intimidate and to achieve political goals (See Hoffman, 2006). The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists relied on a campaign of assassinations of Polish and Soviet officials and pro-Polish Ukrainians in the 1930s in order to advance its political goals. For example, Stepan Bandera, and other leading members of the OUN, such as Mykola Lebed Roman Shukhevych, organized in 1934 an assassination of Bronislaw Pieracki, the Polish Minister of Internal Affairs.

There is also evidence of the involvement of the OUN in international terrorism, but this aspect of the OUN activity still remains largely unresearched. For example, archival documents at the Roosevelt Presidential Library show that the U.S. Secret Service, the FBI, and Henry Field, a special intelligence aide to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, investigated an involvement of OUN members, leaders, and sympathizers in a possible Nazi-led plot to assassinate U.S. President Roosevelt. These documents indicate that Christian Zinsser, an agent of German security services who worked under cover of a German press attaché in Buenos Aires, recruited in the beginning of 1941 Hryhorii Matseiko with a mission to kill President Roosevelt.10 (See Henry Field Papers.) Matseiko was an OUN terrorist who assassinated Pieracki on the order of Stepan Bandera. The same archival documents and Pavel Sudoplatov, a Soviet intelligence agent who infiltrated the OUN leadership in the middle of the 1930s, both independently refer to assistance provided by the OUN to Croatian Ustashi in the assassination of the King of Yugoslavia and the French Foreign Minister in France in 1934 (See Henry Field Papers; Sudoplatov 26)…

The UPA mounted an anti-Soviet terror campaign in Western Ukraine. KGB data put Soviet casualties of the OUN-UPA in 1944-1953 at 22 thousand civilians, compared to about 8 thousand members of military, security, police, and paramilitary forces. Most of the civilian casualties were pro-Soviet local Ukrainians, Soviet and Communist Party officials, and intelligentsia, many of whom came from historically Eastern Ukraine. (See Politychnyi 771).

“Historical studies show that many representatives of the OUN and a significant proportion of the UPA members were involved in the Nazi genocide. The Nazi genocidal policy was responsible for deaths of most of about 7 million people, including 1.5 million Jews, who perished in Ukraine during World War II (Brandon and Lower; Katchanovski, “Politics of Soviet and Nazi Genocides;” Vallin, Mesle, Adamets, and Pyrozhkov). In Volhynia, Jews accounted for more than 200,000 out of the estimated 400-500 thousands victims among the local population and Soviet POWs. (See Hrytsiuk). The OUN-B and the OUN-M established local police and administration in many regions of Ukraine, particularly in the West, following the German occupation of Ukraine in 1941. Although the police was reorganized by the German authorities into auxiliary police in the fall of 1941 and a significant number of OUN commanders and members were removed from the police and even arrested, the OUN continued to maintain substantial presence and informal control over many units of the auxiliary police, especially, in Volhynia and Galicia. The local police helped to implement the Nazi genocides of Jews, Ukrainians, Russians, Byelorussians, and Poles by assisting in mass executions and other  policies aimed at the physical elimination of the entire Jewish population and significant parts of the Ukrainian, Russian, Byelorussian, and Polish population. (See Berkhoff; Brandon and Lower; Diukov; Katchanovski, “Politics of Soviet and Nazi Genocides;” Politychnyi).” source: Katchanovski




After the Odessa Massacre, Nazis Colonize State Armed Forces – Behind Ukraine’s Walls Of Fire (I)

10367731_788701541142514_1064319705282282568_n (2)

A mother and her children were among the dozens butchered, shot dead, or burned alive by the Neo-nazis from Right Sector on May 2, 2014 in Odessa. The massacre preceded more horror for the industrial east. The government in Kyiv tried to hide that these three people existed. Images (see them here at time code 1:12:38- 1:12:41) forced them to admit that they were indeed in the building torched by the Neo-nazis: a boy was in the hospital; his mom and brother were among those murdered – officially 46, unofficially lots more. Odessa bears the mark of terror inflicted by the capitalist class in pursue of her criminal interests.


A large crowd of young men, looking up at a burning building, suddenly hear the agonizing screams of a woman. The horror in those screams tells them she is in mortal danger. One of them is the aggressor. They are aware of what is going on.

The screams last a minute or so, on and off. While they continue, this is what they are saying to each other:

-“That’s not a woman. She’s a separatist!

– “Beat the shit out of her. Make her shut up!

– “Yeah, women sit at home with their children. This one is an animal!

Seconds later, from the room next to the one where the woman was being murdered, two boys show up waving a flag. The crowd explodes in patriotic cheers of joy. The two boys have been taught to see themselves as “warriors.” This is their moment of glory. “Glory to Ukraine! Death to her enemies!” Here’s a piece of propaganda by Svoboda’s education minister explaining why their neo-fascist ideology is such a wonderful thing.


The enemy of these boys was a woman who was living in Ukraine, where most people speak Ukrainian and Russian, but these days, for living in the industrial East of the country – targeted by the IMF -, they became “terrorists.” For the “national revolutionaries” of Right Sector, who colonize state armed forces now, they are “occupants”.


Neo-nazi Right Sector (UNA-UNSO) are becoming state army and police.


Neo-nazis in Odessa, carrying police shields, two days after the massacre they committed inside the trade union building.

Ruling politicians in Kyiv employ a double language – one for internal use, and one for outside. At home, they are “the holy warriors” and ruthless aggressors; to the external world they play the victims of Russian imperialism. The internal narrative of the new government in Kyiv is built around symbols and names and certain understandings of moments in history which the West cannot see, and does not really care to look at, simply dismissing them as nationalism due to Ukraine being a former colony in the ex-USSR. But there is more to that. The massacre in Odessa was possible because the nazi killers knew they would get away with it. Heck, they even celebrated days later.


Right Sector set the trade union building on fire in Odessa, May 2, to cover up the massacre they committed inside where they butchered dozens of Odessites.


Odessa, May 2, 2014: the massacre was covered up by the government. Right Sector are supported by the Kyiv government to destroy dissenters in Eastern Ukraine.

The new president Petro Poroshenko has ordered that the rebellion in the east against the Kyiv government be done with by 14th of June. The government will enroll young men to the National Guard (Right Sector), not just the army. Military service is mandatory in Ukraine. In Kyiv parents took it to the streets immediately protesting their children be enrolled in the National Guard and be deployed in eastern Ukraine – also demanding that the increase of cost of life be stopped. They promise to make a real revolution to get rid of the “junta”, this is how they call the current government of Ukraine. Other protests erupted in Kyiv when the government, which came to power using the EuroMaidan, attempted to dismantle the tents a few hundred people have kept there – the new EuroMaidan government used violence against them, but failed.

Right Sector incorporated into a para-statal National Guard, sent to occupy industrial cities in eastern Ukraine. They are shelling schools, hospitals, and homes.  It is not known how many civilians they’ve murdered.

Right Sector making law and order on the streets of Dnepropetrovsk, when they attacked an anti-government rally.

Nazis inside the Odessa trade union building before they set it on fire to cover up the massacre.

Pic from a propaganda clip of Right Sector (UNA-UNSO) explaining their “national revolution” and promising “European reconquista.”

“Bandera will come and clean up the mess”, see here a compilation of the Nazis marching in the cities of Ukraine- what is dismissed by their supporters in the West as “Russian propaganda.”

Right Sector and the army killed dozens of residents in Mariupol who refused to let them occupy the city. Residents forced the Kyiv forces out of the city.

Dmitry Yarosh, now Parubiy’s deputy, on the scene at EuroMaidan, pursuing the “national revolution.”

There are more groups forming Right Sector, which is actually the stage-name of UNA-UNSO, a die hard nazi organization, active in exile and in Ukraine for decades. This one was one of the oldest collaborators of Yarosh; he was killed in March in a conflict with some policemen, after the change of power in Kyiv.

Funeral of a UNA-UNSO. among the first killed at EuroMaidan in the battles with the police. All the groups forming Right Sector share the ideology of the nazi Stepan Bandera, who was whitewashed and turned into a national hero. His organisation has massacred Ukrainians (who did not submit to his ideas), Poles and Jews. Their main enemies today are Russian speaking population in the east.

UNA-UNSO flag next to EU’s at EuroMaidan.

Svoboda’s leader at the funeral of a UNA-UNSO. All political parties in the government back the ideology of Stepan Bandera, whom they whitewashed into “a nationalist.” Here are some of his crimes (graphic).

EuroMaidan fighter, carrying nazi symbols on his shield.


Neocon Victoria Nuland, from the U.S. State Department, said they invested 5 billion dollars for “the democracy” in Ukraine. People she supported see the Russian population in the east as “occupants.” They are bombing civilians in their homes and shelling hospitals and schools, they execute women, children and men on the streets in the East. Miners on strike are called “Russian agents,” “Anti-oligarchs,” EuroMaidan made way for a new president – a filthy rich oligarch, 6th richest capitalist in Ukraine. Nuland plotted that “Yats” be named Prime-Minister. Yats worked for the IMF 10 years ago. He’s implementing IMF’s “free markets” now in Ukraine.

They killed in Odessa for the “purity” of their “nation” – the nazi propaganda tells them those who don’t live for “their” “ancestors” will commit “suicide.” This is their national revolution they have been preparing for many years. The boys who murdered inside the Odessa trade union building were indoctrinated by ruthless propagandists into believing that the Russian population in the East are “occupants.” EuroMaidan, which brought a coalition dominated by the fascist Svoboda to power by avoiding elections, could unite so many different people on common ground, because it started decades ago and it grew in time. The majority of the people at the EuroMaidan were and still are against the interests of the minority which came to hack it, but the most powerful weapon in the hands of this minority was a past they already controlled and used to the point in which they turned it into a reality – this is one factor which made it possible for them to paralyze any potential opposition to their agenda.

RS exterminate

Right Sector (Pravyi Sektor) propaganda – posted on their pages after the Odessa massacre, which they committed couple of months after they were pushed to power. They mean what the poster says: “Transgress! Oppress! Depopulate! Restrain! Suppress! Exterminate!”

They prepared for it, trained for it, marched for it, made propaganda for it, manipulated and rewrote and cleansed history of what challenged their propaganda (one of their sickest manipulations ever is that they have turned Nestor Makhno, who was everything they are not — an anarcho-communist and an anti-capitalist revolutionary — into a nationalist to serve their fascist propaganda); they revived and used a messianic past up to the point in which history became exclusively a political ideology program; they recruited school kids and students and turned them into their soldiers. It grew in schools and universities, in the church, in the training camps, on the streets and on the stadiums.


Stepan Bandera displayed by Lvov ultras. Football fans, mostly from Dynamo Kyiv, were recruited as fighters at the EuroMaidan.

“Angola is not England,

Russia is not Rus” –

A slogan on a poster the Russian police confiscated from Ukrainian football fansSource

Beyond the fact that Russian and Ukrainian chauvinism feed each other, those who came to power at the end of February in Kyiv have unleashed a stigmatization campaign, the likes of which have not been seen in Europe for a while. There are politicians in Kyiv who call for the ethnic cleansing of a part of the civilian population – because speaking Russian makes them “occupants.” There are supporters of the government who call them “bugs.” There are supporters of the government who shot them dead, butchered them and burned them alive under the eyes of the entire world, and, because the Western leaders’ mentality is quite totalitarian, the massacre of these people became “law enforcement,” or some unavoidable “tragedy.” In fact, Odessa was a massacre, planned, staged and executed with the intent to instill terror in the minds and hearts of the people living in the East. It was praised by politicians in Kyiv, who called for more killings. It’s how nazis work: they create mayhem, they terrorize so then later they can come and make “law and order” – which never apply to them. 


The Kyiv government claimed they don’t know what started the fire. This photo shows them it was their supporters – Right Sector nazis and political army ultras – who set the building on fire — you can see at least 7 Molotovs being thrown at the building.

On May 2, as people were watching the Trade Union building in Odessa engulfed in flames, in the East, tanks and helicopters were invading cities and villages to quell a rebellion – get this: a legitimate rebellion – against the government in Kyiv. There is an uprising in the East against the new government in Kyiv. It broke out not because Yanukovych was ousted or because they want to split the country.


Unarmed residents of Marioupol stop with their bare hands a tank sent by the Kyiv government to invade them. Dozens were killed days later – shot on the streets by Kyiv’s “peace” messengers.

It erupted after Kyiv forcefully appointed some of the richest oligarchs in Ukraine as their local governors, and a propaganda machine has been started to stigmatize and terrorize the Russian speaking population. After the verbal violence, they deployed the tanks and bombs. Never mind the hypocrisy of the new rulers in Kyiv who forgot that Lvov indeed voted for separation from Ukraine, and that they themselves occupied public buildings to pressure their rivals in Kyiv out of power. Their behavior has helped anti-Kyiv sentiments in Crimea explode, which were speculated by Moscow’s machinations, and resulted into a controversial referendum through which Crimea broke away from Ukraine and joined Russia. Putin’s arrogant let-me-show-you-my-muscles‘ statements towards eastern Ukraine certainly helped Kyiv’s propaganda against the Russian-speaking population in the industrial East of the country. [See here, Noam Chomsky:  “Russia’s annexation of Crimea was an illegal act. One comparable example comes to mind: U.S. control of Guantanamo Bay in southeastern Cuba.”] 

10256161_848807221802719_2239043989096897556_n (1)

In the east, villagers erected barricades to stop Kyiv’s tanks from invading them.

[On May 11th, in the industrial East, they held local referendums demanding autonomy from Kyiv, and, in the east, the Kyiv government did send armed thugs and tanks to terrorize, murder and scare people off from the polling stations. Unarmed civilians defied the threat of the Kyiv government officials, who said that their military terror operation will continue, whatever people in the East do. Putin also demanded they postpone the referendum, but they kept it going. To break their resistance, the government in Kyiv also punished them and announced they would not pay people’s pensions and salaries. Because civilians voting are “terrorists” for Neo-nazis like Parubiy (see note at the end about why we call them Neo-nazis*). He said, “If [the date of the referendum] is going to be postponed or they announce the results of the referendum it does not make any difference. The anti-terrorist operation will continue.” Source]


Hundreds were killed when Kyiv’s air force bombed Donetsk where miners have been striking to demand economic autonomy.

On March 2, 2014 (one week after the power reshuffle) the Unites States cut their first slice of the prey when the new government revised their contract with Chevron so that the company enjoys absolute privileges and the ability to sell this gas to Ukraine itself with higher prices. “Ukraine has Europe’s third-largest shale gas reserves at 42 trillion cubic feet, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.”

“On March 2d, 2014 Interim president of Ukraine, Turchinov in presence of the U.S., German and Polish ambassadors in Ukraine signed a preliminary agreement with the IMF on financial help to Ukraine, according to which:

– all gas transportation systems of Ukraine upon signing of the final agreement go under the company Chevron (the U.S. company).

– Owners of Mariupol, Zaporozhye and Dnepropetrovsk metallurgical plants must transfer 50% of their companies shares to the German Ruhr.

Donbass coal production is to be transmitted to Finnish subsidiary of the Ruhr company. Among some political demands in the signed document is an annex, according to which NATO will place on territories near Kharkov the U.S. missile defense systems, the U.S fighter aircraft for anti-missile shield!” Source: First Deputy Ambassador of the Czech Republic in Poland.

RS anti-russian propaganda

Neo-nazi Right Sector consider Russian speakers in Ukraine “occupants.” This is probably why they say they are “Europeans.” Some Europeans don’t like to be reminded the role of slavery, racism in their history, the true engines of capitalism.

On April 12, CIA’s boss John Brennan visited Kyiv in secret, which he later had to admit publicly. On April 13, the interim president of Ukraine, Olexander Turchinov, announced that a military “anti-terrorist” operation would be launched. “Anti-terrorist” is newspeak for military occupation: residents in towns, cities and villages oppose it by erecting barricades, literally stopping tanks with their bare hands. Out of some 8 million, some 1,000 have got their hands on arms. There are also Chechens in the East and Cossacks from Russia; as there are Italians, Canadians, Swedish, Germans and Americans in support of Kyiv’s armed forces.

On April 24, the Right Sector Rambo wannabe boss Dmitry Yarosh announced “he moved his HQs” to the east (in Dnepropetrovsk) so he can “keep a better eye on Russia.”

On April 29 Parubiy was in Odessa meeting Mykola, one of Right Sector’ public executioners. (see images and photos in the part II of this blog)


Parubiy and Yarosh, the bosses of the armed forces at the EuroMaidan; later came to control the armed forces of Ukraine. Both are fanatical Neo-nazis.

On April 29, the country’s interim president claimed they lost control over the east. The German foreign minister also said the civilians in the east are not controlled by anyone. “Control” means people must accept whatever will be done to them – it is also telling of the mentality of these individuals who imagine that people cannot do anything on their own unless they are put to it.

On May 1st, the IMF boss told Kyiv that if they don’t suppress the disobedient population in the industrial east, the IMF would “re-design” “its agreement” with Ukraine (blackmail): “Should the central government lose effective control over the east, the program will need to be re-designed,” the IMF threatened. The next day, on May 2nd, tanks and helicopters and the Right Sector – aka National Guard – invaded the industrial cities in the east. Almost everyday since the occupation people have been killed in the east. On May 25, as there were presidential elections, the bombing got only worse as hospitals and schools are targeted in Slaviansk.

Photo: Ukraina codziennie giną niewinni ludzie, panie Kaczynski, Tusk, Sikorski czy wam nie wstyd teraz?

Kyiv’s military have killed hundreds of civilians in the east – they call them “terrorists”. Here’s how the National Guard have opened fire on civilians in the city of Mariupol, on May 9.

The Right Sector Neo-nazis are leading the military occupation of civilians in the industrial East of Ukraine, which has been urged by the IMF. Just hours after the power reshuffle in Kyiv on February 22, UK’s foreign secretary did not even have the decency to let their new guys in Kyiv announce the IMF invasion, he rushed to urge that things get done fast (before people in Ukraine can realize what it will be done to them). Right Sector are needed because soldiers are fired if they refuse to kill civilians (they have to pass tests checking their willingness to open fire and kill civilians, see here such a test, questions 17 and 18); there are reports that some soldiers are killed when they disobey the Kyiv government. Those willing to kill women and children for the IMF are deployed in the east, but it seems there are not too many, because Right Sector is really desperate to recruit anyone willing to kill for money. Tymoshenko also announced that “all military action will be deployed in nearest future against any mass meeting of people,” – such are in fact the real European values. (In this video, she also thanked the nazi thugs who massacred people in Odessa for “fighting for Ukraine’s future.”)

On May 7, even Yatsenyuk visited the camps where their killers are trained in eastern Ukraine. The Kyiv government demanded “help” from the the United States. Already, German papers reported that U.S.’s Blackwater mercenaries have been sent in the East (Monsanto aims big in Ukraine too). This is why the U.S. state department said that killing civilians and repressing their resistance with such brutality is “proportionate and reasonable.”

They have to protect all sorts of daddy’s sons and corporations, like Chevron and Monsanto: “Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that Russia saw no conflict of interest in Joe Biden working to wean Ukraine off Russian gas – which makes up about 60 percent of the country’s energy supply – while his son worked in the Ukrainian gas industry.”

Of course, the European Commission urged Ukraine to use the money they get from the EU to pay off its debt for Russia’s Gazprom. “This is support for the Ukrainian budget with a view [to enabling Ukraine] to make the necessary payments in the energy sector,” Simon O’Connor said. And, Total SA (FP) agreed to seek shale oil in Western Siberia with OAO Lukoil (LKOD), “brushing off U.S. and European sanctions against Russia over its annexation of Crimea.” On May 28, EurAsia – a trade replica of the European Union in Asia – was signed, most likely not appreciated in Washington.   

[“War is the product of the capitalist system as a whole. Tomorrow’s war will not find the democracies opposing the dictatorships. Behind ideological pretexts, imperialist realities are concealed. …For many people, anti-fascism has become synonymous with chauvinism. Fascism must be fought not from the outside by imperialist war but from within by proletarian class struggle.D.Guerin’s Fascism and Big Business ]

However, Yulia Tymoshenko later said they “set up a trap for Putin” in Crimea. The same Tymoshenko who said that the 8 million ethnic Russian people in the East must be “nuked.” The same Tymoshenko who cut the gas deal to the benefits of Gazprom, EU and Russia (Putin opposed her jail sentence). The same one for whose release out of jail (where she was sentenced for the Gazprom deal), the European Unionsupported by the United States — conditioned the signing of a trade agreement with Ukraine back in December. Yanukovych – who already agreed to increase gas tariffs and cut benefits for the IMF loan – said no, and refused to let Tymoshenko escape jail. The deal failed. (So, in reality, it’s not really Ukraine who rejected the deal with EU, it was the other way around: the EU refused to sign a deal with Ukraine). Russia, on the other hand, seems to have used her “offer” for Ukraine only to help EU put more pressure on Ukraine to meet their conditions, while insisting they were not infringing Russia’s interests (EU was not concerned that Ukraine was signing trade agreements with Russia). Kyiv was trying to get itself in a better position towards Gazprom while apparently managed to cut a deal to pay for gas what the EU was paying (after Tymoshenko’s deal with Gazprom, Ukraine was paying 50% more to Gazprom than EU).  Protests erupted when Yanukovych “backed off” (as the mainstream media narrative was) from signing the deal with the EU, but “despite what he claims, it wasn’t the Kremlin that made him do that.” The more Yanukovych resisted West’s condition to release Tymoshenko, the more Putin was insisting with “his offer” of lowering gas prices “only for 2014”, “conveniently forgetting that it was Russia’s refusal to trade with Ukraine that brought the country’s economy to its knees.” Putin’s offer was also “potentially hazardous for Russia. Under that scheme, Moscow would have need(ed) to pump a lot more money into Ukraine and give it a large say in joint bodies such as the Eurasian Economic Commission, with little guarantee that Ukraine wouldn’t break away again once it recovered from its current financial crunch.” Putin was not into “charity“, especially when that meant 7 billion dollars.

pic 50

After Crimea split and joined Russia, Moscow let the Kyiv government take its weaponry back, which they later deployed to massacre residents in Eastern Ukraine. Kyiv admitted only after two months that they moved their weapons from Crimea to invade the East. Source

Now, after Crimea, the Kyiv government is accusing anyone not recognizing them — “they’re legitimate” just because former Gazprom employee, authoritarian Carl Buildt says so, and Obama called them “duly elected” before any elections took place – of being “separatists,” which is a lie they use to justify sending tanks and armed thugs against them. However, the real separatists are the Western experts who demanded that Ukraine be split because it would be “just the best thing” that it could happen to her (see part II of this blog).

This is how the IMF works, they have done it before in Yugoslavia (see links at the end of the blog). Only now it will be worse, if they are not stopped. And nobody in the ruling classes in Kyiv, in the West or in Russia want to stop them. Moscow backs IMF’s “structural adjustments” and “reforms” for Ukraine (read, capitalist accumulation). Putin is not communist, he is a capitalist plutocrat, and a conservative bordering fascism, just like most of the ruling classes in the West are, too. For one simple reason: the autonomy of the working people is bad for capitalists, and it’s systematically destroyed in the United States, in the European Union, in Russia and in Ukraine, too.

Reuters Marko Djurica near Kramatorsk april 16

Locals in the east armed themselves after Kyiv started to kill them – shooting at cars, apartments, people on the streets.

The Neo-nazis from the Right Sector are the vanguard of “an anti-terrorist” operation in the industrial East where people have been protesting the oligarchs (read, capitalist class), imposed on them by Kyiv since early March. Why is this “an anti-terrorist” campaign? Well, because these Neo-nazis call whoever does not accept them terrorists. The people in the East have every right to reject the insults and the stigmatization by the Kyiv government and their supporters. They are called “Colorado beetle,” “Moskali,” “separatists” and “terrorists” or “pro-Russian” (because they happen to speak Russian.)

When these experts say “Ukraine is a country divided between a Ukranian speaking population and a Russian speaking population” where exactly are their own values? Both populations live in the same cities, they are next door neighbors – in the west some are more, in the east others are more. Why should cultural diversity be considered “a divide”? Sadly it is, because the nationalists in the western Ukraine see it as a threat to their own legitimacy, and because: “the culture, language, and political thinking of western Ukraine have been imposed upon the rest of Ukraine. Ostensibly this is for the sake of “unifying the country,” but in fact the objective has been to put down and humiliate Ukraine’s Russian-speaking population. The radical nationalists of western Ukraine, for whom the rejection of Russia and its culture is an article of faith, intend to force the rest of the country to fit their narrow vision. Western and eastern Ukraine do not understand each other’s preoccupations, just as Cubans in Miami and Cubans in Havana would not understand each other. Ukrainian conflict is not the conflict between the “pro-Russian separatists” and “pro-Ukrainians,” but rather between two Ukrainian groups who do not share each other’s vision of an independent Ukraine. … Easterners are angry that pro-Bandera banners, posters and graffiti are popping up all over Ukraine and with the rewriting of history in general, where violent nationalists who fought alongside the Nazis are treated as heroes while Russians, who suffered under Stalin no less than the Ukrainians, are denigrated. Following the exile of President Victor Yanukovich and Russia’s annexation of Crimea, Ukrainian nationalist rhetoric has become downright offensive and hysterical, ostracizing further the people in the east.” (This is an excerpt from an article by Vladimir Golstein, a professor of Slavic studies at Brown University. He was born in Moscow and emigrated to the United States in 1979. It’s among the few worth reading published by the capitalist media in the West.)

right sector euromaidan 14 88

Notice on the back wall the nazi symbols 14/88, meaning “Hail Hitler” and white supremacy propaganda. But you are delusional, these are not nazis: it’s just “Russian propaganda,” as their apologists keep saying.

Before we go further this must be said: we use the term Neo-nazis to describe those who participate and belong to the organisations under the umbrella of Right Sector (the last link is their propaganda channel, they are UNA-UNSO rebranded and expanded). On their website they publish announcements on behalf of Yarosh, announce training camps – with the ministry of defense, too.  (see Boot training UNSD in Kiev _Ukrainian National Assembly (UNA-UNSD) / Right Sector _Ukrainian National Assembly (UNA-UNSD)  / Statement ZHOO UNSD activities on _the right sector_ in _UNA-UNSO Zhitomir  / Right Sector _Ukrainian National Assembly (UNA-UNSD)


Nazis from UNA-UNSO training with the defense ministry in Ukraine in April.

We don’t call them Neo-nazis because Russia says so, we already explained that EurAsia promotes a fascist ideology (see here, one of their magazine, and here more about its ideologue, Dugin). We call them such simply because they are, and such is the ideology they impose. They and their armed thugs are the worst enemies of the working people. We call Svoboda Neo-fascists because they mirror the ideology of EurAsia and other fascists in the West too, who are tolerated and supported by the Western governments.

svoboda N

First published by Les Crises who also publish lots of documented reports on the Neo-nazis in Ukraine.

In a documentary called “Neo-nazi threat in Ukraine“, BBC interviewed some of them, revealing how deep the indoctrination of these boys is:

“- National- socialism themes are popular amongst some of us. The idea of one nation. Not everyone in our organisation shares this idea, but some people do believe in it.

– What about you?

– I personally do.

– Please, explain.

– I like the idea of one nation.

– I want there to be one nation, one people, one country.

– What does that mean?

A clean nation. Not like under Hitler. But in our own way a little bit like that.

Those who like Russia – let them move to Russia.”

There are 13 ethnic minorities living in Ukraine. Here’s another one, a C14 (presented as Svoboda‘s armed group) leader, showing up a swastika carved out on a military hat, while he says he does not consider himself a nazi, but “a nationalist.” You know, “Ukraine’s only hope“- only somebody hating them deeply can mock them like that.

download (8)

Cops and Right Sector having a laugh next to the building were residents of Odessa were butchered and burned alive. Women are trying to escape the fire at the 1st floor window.

It’s utterly dishonest to see authoritarian laws in Russia, or in Ukraine (like those on January 16th, and probably lots more to come), but endorse similar ones in Spain, Turkey, the United States, Germany, UK. It is utterly dishonest to say Putin is the only threat when the states in the West jail anti-fascists for defending people attacked by Nazis under the noses of the police (Joel’s case, Sweden), not to mention the political police on full display in the United States and Europe. It is not a contradiction that the West has supported Svobodabanks in the United States have demanded fascism in Europe. It is dishonest to talk about fascism and not mention capitalism- fascism is a violent ultra-reactionary phase of capitalism, meant to crush any resistance or potential resistance by the working class. It is just dishonest to pretend there are no oligarchs in Europe or in the United States, that they are just in Russia and Ukraine – it is mystifying to call them oligarchs, the correct term should be: capitalist class not interested in saving appearances.

It is not honest to pretend – like the West does – that they care about “saving Ukraine” – and use the country’s dire situation to sink her into more debts. Why does Ukraine have such huge debts in the first place? Why are these not investigated? What independence is that when the IMF is creating more poor, desperate and vulnerable proletarians by destroying the autonomy of the working people, by raising the gas prices to intolerable levels, and literally stealing food from kids? How many tanks are necessary for politicians to avoid talking about what capitalism really is? Why must people in Russia be guilty for the state capitalism imposed on them in the past centurywhen the West have joined the dictators‘ propaganda and lies about it being “communism”? Why must people in Russia be hated because they suffered under state capitalism, and then endured even more horrors from the IMF? Who created “the oligarchs” in Russia, which now has the greatest inequality in the world? Was it not the IMF by privatization (read, destroying the unions and abusively appropriating the vital resources from the majority)? These oligarchs are the same as everywhere in Eastern Europe: the former ruling class of the state capitalism, before the Iron Curtain collapsed. Private capitalism of today is an extension of the state capitalism of yesterday. “More nationalism” needed in Ukraine, they say (ignoring the massacre in Odessa)? How about no more lies. Oligarchs in Russia or Ukraine are those who in the the West are called the 1%. They are the same as Koch brothers or ALEC. Oligarchs in Russia are bad, but TPP is good? What sort of “logic” is this?

Here’s what people in Odessa, and many in the rest of the east, were saying before the massacre:

“- The situation in the country is awful. First they drove a wedge between us and our Russian brothers. As for me, I’m neither going to travel to Russia, nor to anywhere else. I want to live in Odessa. I want everything to be fine. I want us to be friends with Russia. The West is not for us, you know. What’s happening in our country is a nightmare. How will we survive? For instance, my salary is 92 dollars per month. Can I get by? Gas prices are now about to spike by 73%. The prices for medicine have already been raised by 60%. It’s terrible. Really, terrible.”

People living in the West of Ukraine certainly can say the same thing. It’s just the IMF doing their best.

5 mai odessa

Right Sector are colonizing and replacing the police and the army, to pursue their “national revolution”. Nazis could not care less about elections.

We don’t call the Right Sector (and their para-statal, semi-official, private funded National Guard avatars) Neo-nazis to smear the legitimate protests of the people in Kyiv who hoped to get rid of the social and economic grievances, even if they can’t decode them as class struggle. (To expect class conscience in Eastern Europe is showing how little the West does know about Stalinism – which was not communism). There are 46 million people in Ukraine – anyone pretending to speak their mind is lying. They are not nazis – why are they all assumed to be like some minister in their government? – the nazis are the minority who control state power.

People who took it to the streets and protested their government and battled the police had the right to do so (by the way, is that Yarosh still riding Yanukovych’s luxury limo?). They also have every right not to be fooled and lied that what is happening to them now is “freedom” or “democracy”. What is happening to them now is the result of one of the most brutal capitalist accumulations by the ruling classes. The prey is Ukraine’s resources and its working people, (Ukrainian speakers and Russian speakers), who are the real producers of the wealth, appropriated by capitalists. 

The fact that the protests in Kyiv were used to bring to power whoever the ruling classes wanted is the responsibility of the ruling classes, not of the people they used and lied to. The responsibility for bringing fascist Svoboda to state power is the responsibility of the ruling classes – these are people who control economic, political, and military decisions. These ruling bastards are those who have told cosmic lies in the past months. In the industrial East of the country, people who reject the government in Kyiv and who cannot see Bandera, because they are right to consider him a Nazi, are not trying to break up the country – the largest majority of people in Ukraine want their country to stick together. There are some who openly want to break away and join Russia, inciting more violence against the local population, but they don’t enjoy a large support. If opinions are quite different towards Russia, the opposition and rejection of the government in Kyiv seems to be  quite widespread, especially among the Russian speakers, and this was clear during the referendum they held. This is not irrational – the government in Kyiv bears full responsibility for alienating the Russian speaking population in Ukraine. 


U.S.’s Republican and Democrat politicians on the stage of EuroMaidan next to Svoboda’s “You’ll all kneel at the grave of Bandera soon.”

When it comes to bread and work, there is no real divide between the people who speak Russian or Ukrainian, or both. But there is a lot of hatred taught to them, so that working people in Kyiv do not protest in mass when working people in Marioupol are butchered by the new military of the Kyiv government, or when residents of Balashikha are bombed by the planes of the Kyiv government. So that those living in the West consider themselves “superior” to those living in the East – they are not. So they do not protest when a woman is killed in the Trade Union building in Odessa – just like that. So they don’t see that this woman does not even exist for those who record the history these days. So they don’t see that Odessa is slipping into the City of Shadows of the past. So they don’t see the people in Kyiv who cried for this woman and the others massacred in Odessa. So they don’t know that they cried in Moscow too. They did not cry in the offices and palaces of the civilized cruel politicians in the Western world. The scene is here, be warned that it’s traumatic, like the rest of the videos linked in this blog.

When the woman’s killer appeared at the window of the crime scene, in the Trade Union building, to savor his victory, the men cheered enthusiastically. This crime happened while riot police were present among the crowd, behaving invisible, and at the same time when firefighters were just taking somebody out of the 5-story burning building. It’s surreal. This documentary in Russian shows how the Right Sector are recruited among the criminals in prisons, rapists and even serial killers. The more terror they can inflict upon the civilian population, the better suited they are. You can translate subtitles, and see here at minute 5 how they are recruited from prisons, at 1:52 how a Right Sector raped an old woman, at 11:52 – 12:32 what happens to one of their “enemies”, how they train singing U.S. marines songs, at minute 9 a mutiny inside the Ukrainian army. Two weeks after Odessa, Right Sector and the EuroMaidan interior ministry were deeply shocked to learn that 17,000 police in the east have refused to work for them and “deserted.” We discuss below how Right Sector are colonizing the police and the army — just like their OUN-B ancestors and UPA have terrorized local populations in the past – and you can evaluate for yourself the intellectual honesty of elites claiming to be terribly disturbed that the Neo-nazis have not been whitewashed enough; this is what they say after the massacre in Odessa: “These exaggerations about the role of the far right are so over-present, and they have to be counteracted.” Funny, these people never seem concerned to counter-attack the propaganda done by the “far right” (they don’t to call them Neo-nazis to make them look more acceptable).


See below how, while people were burning and were being massacred in the Trade Union building, the nazis were leaving their signatures on the wall. But, again, you are delusional, this is Russian propaganda, as their apologists say even today.

As for historians who minimalise the Right Sector’s presence because they did poorly in presidential elections, they are twice as irresponsible: precisely because Nazis get to be hated by the local population they dominate, they will spill the blood of those who contest them, precisely because they know they will never be elected, they have other means to be in power (with the help of the state, always).


Some people are so caught up in the hatred for Putin that are willing to just ignore the massacre in Odessa, or justify it. But the more people are killed in Ukraine by their government, the more the life of every person in Ukraine is devalued. The more they slip into the civil war fatalistic mentality where killing “the other” is just what thugs like the IMF need. The real aggressors always manage to pose as saviors, when in fact they deliver death. This is why some call for more “nationalism,” so they cannot see what is being done to people like them – workers. More nationalism will make worker kill worker. Father kill father. Brother kill somebody else’s brother. Every person killed these days in Ukraine is devaluing the life of everyone else living in Ukraine. It’s the downward spiral towards the mind-set of civil war

fb right sector

This is the person who is indoctrinating the kids whom the Neo-nazis recruit to kill people for “the purity of the nation.” She is also a fanatical Neo-nazi, and she is the spokesperson of the Right Sector. Facebook removed our post about her.

Later in the evening, the woman’s killer appeared in a picture threatening a man on the ground. They still won’t look for him, because they won’t admit that he committed any murder. They won’t admit any murders happened. They call them “a tragedy.” There are many who justify the massacre at Kulikovo as “understandable” or ”unavoidable” (the gunshots he talks in the last blog linked were shot at the people inside the trade union building) – so that the aggressors can present themselves as victims. There are too many details which point to the fact that there was nothing unavoidable about it. Quite the contrary.


Screenshot from a propanda clip of the neo-nazi Right Sector, announcing a great “European Reconquista”.

The Odessa massacre happened two months after ”the promoters of the European dream” have been pushed to power in Kyiv, to “reboot the system” (capitalism) and get rid of a guy who, among other things, risked to compromise their system too much (Viktor Yanukovych is a product of capitalism). Since December, pro- and anti- Yanukovych, Russian, and EuroMaidan people demonstrated in the city: except that on April 10, 2014, Right Sector attempted to spoil the anniversary of the city’s liberation from the Nazis: violence broke out, and Right Sector barely made it out of Odessa.


The government claimed that only people from the “peaceful” Right Sector ultras were hit by unidentified red armband snipers in Odessa, 3 from the side of the anti-Kyiv protestors were also killed. Snipers were firing from behind the police lines, 3 days after Parubiy visited a battalion of Right Sector stationed in Odessa.

On May 2, snipers suddenly appeared. Snipers were a big propaganda win in Kyiv, and they are still not investigated, in spite of all legitimate questions (the person caught with weapons for snipers is Tymoshenko’s ex-prime-minister, he is a hotshot in the presidential administration in Kyiv). Snipers were a big propaganda win in other “revolutions” in Eastern Europe – those who came to power exploiting the bloodshed promised that they will be caught. They never were.


Red arm bands were those who provoked the violence at a Ultras march in Odessa, they were called “Russia’s instigators.” The police this one talks to later conveniently disappeared.

However, the civilized elites in the West ignore the Odessa massacre, or, worse, rationalize it, justify it and even endorse it. It’s hardly surprising: they know very well who are those with a past in the Neo-nazi organisation UNA-UNSO and her avatars. Andrei Parubiy, boss over defence, security and police forces, co-founder of a nazi party together with Oleh Tyanbok in 1991, coordinator of para-military nazi squads, Tetiana Chornovol (lustration, getting rid of political dissenters), Dmytro Bulatov (sports, former auto-maidan strongly supported from the United States), and many others. Dmitry Yarosh is the deputy head of the National Security Council (Parubiy’s deputy), and is colonizing the state power position in the country. Together with Parubiy they recruit “volunteers” for the army and the police. One of Parubiy’s “promises” was the creation of a 20,000 strong National Guard (Natsgvardii, which will integrate the Neo-nazi organisations from the EuroMaidan), to replace the police, the first squads were unleashed in the industrial east – “on the front” – in April.


Yarosh and the current boss of the secret service SBU training one of the group of armed fighters deployed at the EuroMaidan a year later (Trident, Yarosh was their trainer for at least for a decade). See video below; notice there are kids too at this training.

The armed “self-defence” groups are to be dismantled, but Yarosh will keep his, and anyway by then his nazis are in the police and in the army. It’s tragic to hear historians blind themselves that they are not “a majority” (the main argument to appease the criticism towards these Nazi thugs): they never were until they got into positions from where they could eliminate opponents and control everything.


They rebranded today as Right Sector, which did not appear magically out of the fog of history at the end of November in Kyiv’s Independence Square, they just stayed low until they were needed for the “national revolution.” Right Sector is just the stage name, so they can create the impression of spontaneity, which is completely false: they have been at it for many years, and certainly they have been training in public at least since 2006, and started processions carrying nazi flags and portraits of their nazi heroes for many years now. They mean it when they say they want to drive the Russian population – they call them “the occupants” – out of “their” land which they dream to take back. They start to say it publicly – posting maps of their old empire.

pravi sector una unso

That flag is UNA-UNSO‘s , a neo-nazi organization, deployed at the EuroMaidan – they are considered heroes of the revolution -, they are now colonizing the police and armed forces of Ukraine. They have been marching on the streets of Ukraine with real guns for many years now. They have been in Chechnya against Russian troops, as well as other wars.

They are split into more groups – Trident, UNA-UNSO, soccer fans, C14, Ukrainian Patriots -, but they work together and probably are financed by people the Ukrainian Congress of America would certainly know. Right Sector themselves say they trained people back in early December at EuroMaidan, Yarosh said they trained for two years – of course, he lies, they’ve been at it for many more years.

This happened while gradually, the political wing of the Neo-nazis, with support from the United States and Germany, have rehabilitated Stepan Bandera – erecting statues and marching and banning historians who told the truth about him being a nazi, and of course being supported by the media, by university professors etc. Svoboda is largely supported by university graduates, that should give a hint about how powerful the propaganda is to “denazify” (normalize Nazism) in the western Ukraine. (Both Ukrainian Congress of America and Right Sector – which have become a political party meanwhile – monitored and “guarded” elections on May 25.) Ukrainian Congress of America has met with the current prime-minister of Ukraine.

This is Dmitry Yarosh at one of their trainings, he was the boss of “Trident” group. He says that Trident is celebrating it’s 20th anniversary and that throughout these years they were constantly fighting for Ukrainian nationhood: “Without national revolution freedom is impossible.” “In Ancient Rome,” he says, “there was a senator, Marcus Porcius Cato. Whenever he held a speech, he always ended it up saying “Carthage must be destroyed.” As long as our eternal enemy – Russian Empire – exists, Ukrainian statehood is impossible to achieve.” Later he speaks on the importance of Youth fighters. “We were never afraid to speak the truth aloud and we will never relinquish it,” he sums it up:

[UNA-UNSO supported the fascist dictator from Chile, Pinochet, it’s not really surprising the United States backed them and still do: there are at least 35 countries from A to Z, where the United States has supported fascists, drug lords and terrorists.

images (2)

“In Washington, the OUN-B reconstituted under the banner of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America (UCCA), an umbrella organization comprised of “complete OUN-B fronts,” according to Bellant. By the mid-1980’s, the Reagan administration was honeycombed with UCCA members, with the group’s chairman Lev Dobriansky, serving as ambassador to the Bahamas, and his daughter, Paula, sitting on the National Security Council. Reagan personally welcomed Stetsko, the Banderist leader who oversaw the massacre of 7000 Jews in Lviv, into the White House in 1983.“Your struggle is our struggle,” Reagan told the former Nazi collaborator. “Your dream is our dream.” Source]


The people inside the trade union building were shot and clubbed to death before and during the burning of the building set on fire by the Right Sector, to cover up the massacre they committed intentionally.

The Odessa massacre is ignored because the United States and European Union fake humanity, only if they can exploit it to benefit their propaganda or imperialism. When they can be damaging – because they reveal the reality –  they get some damnatio memoriae. Even today, Western politicians visit the place in Kyiv where people were killed in February, but they deny the truth about who really killed them. They fake human feelings, while they sadistically brought the IMF in Ukraine to steal the food from children’s mouths and the books from their hands, and impoverish even more the working classes in Ukraine. Because – don’t laugh – the most corrupt and criminal institution in the world has descended to Kyiv “to fight corruption” – that is, to create even more oligarchs (capitalist class). Is this what people were killed for in Kyiv? So that the IMF can pursue their capitalist accumulation, called “structural adjustment” or “reform” – or whatever wooden language they use – while they pretend to save Ukraine from debts by creating more debts? Putin, is a capitalist, Russia backs the IMF, and the Kremlin has no problem with Biden’s son getting a new toy in Ukraine. It’s just stuff the ruling classes do.

 Continues on part II, see here, and also check the video blog where we post images recorded at Odessa.

* The use of this term has been turned into a political ping-pong, zero sum-game propaganda between the Western media and the Russian media, in a fight to control the narrative over Ukraine. The UNA-UNSO, from which key rulers in the Kyiv state power have sprung, is a die hard Neo-nazi organisation. Of course, they call themselves ”nationalists,” but they could call themselves martians too, the ideology they promote is still nazism. There is an army of academia, historians, and journalists who are very concerned with hiding who these people are and what they stand for, and what they are used for – to prevent working class resistance to capitalism – for reasons only they can know and understand. There are some who keep saying that we should not call them nazis because this helps Russia, but at the same time they don’t explain why the Russians called them so, because that would be self-defeating. The fact that RT, the most watched Russian media in the western world, called them nazi at some point, has to do with the historical understanding of the meaning of this word in the collective memory of the Russians. It’s the same as it was during the World War II. Hitler planned to make them slaves because they considered them “an inferior race.” (Europe’s history is no stranger to the fact that the word ”slave” could be traced back to slav.) The Russians are not guilty for remembering what the nazis did to them, unlike the neo-nazis in Ukraine and their supporters in the United States who whitewashed them to such a degree that a nazi mass murderer, fuhrer wannabe has been turned into ”a national hero” and nazi symbols have been turned into public shrines. We’ll discuss in upcoming blogs why this understanding of the word Nazism in Russia does not exclude anti-Semitism, which is rampant in Ukraine and Russia (as well as in the rest of Eastern Europe and quite widespread in Western Europe too), under all sorts of disguised forms, and why Putin’s EurAsia project basically promotes the same fascism as Svoboda’s and other far right parties in Europe. However, neo-Nazi Right Sector traces its roots to the hard-core Nazism and, together with Svoboda and other organizations they are one big family. Just because Svoboda has an office in Brussels and just because U.S.’s neocon Nuland, German officials and former Gazprom employee Carl Buildt love them, it does not change who they are: it just sheds more light on what capitalist elites (whatever political color they wear) really are.

More links

How the IMF Dismantled Yugoslavia: ”But what happened to Yugoslavia — and now continues in its weak successor states — should resonate beyond the Balkans. Yugoslavia is a mirror for similar economic restructuring programs in not only the developing world but also in the US, Canada and Western Europe. The Yugoslav reforms are the cruel reflection of a destructive economic model pushed to the extreme.”

Yugoslavia: Imperialist war against the world proletariat, 1990s – ICG: ”The reality of the war, the sinister development of bombardments, of massacres, of persecutions, of internments, show clearly that this war is a war against the proletariat, against its interests and against its movement of struggle… Consequences:

– Indiscriminate massacres of proletarians, as is shown, for example, by the discovery of mass graves where the bodies of “Serbs”, “Croats”, “Bosnians”… are mixed together.

– The material disarmament of proletarians who refuse to fight on the fronts of this war which they recognise as not being theirs and which they flee from… The always sovereign HCR rejected the request of a Serb deserter who affirmed his “refusal to fight the Croats who are compatriots”. In disarming the trouble-makers, in sending them back to “their” country, the bourgeoisie delivers them tied hand and foot, like peaceful and inoffensive lambs, to their executioners. … ”As long as we remain passive consumers and spectators of our miserable lives, as long as we remain “useful idiots” for Capital, anything can be done to us and we should not be surprised if tomorrow good citizens start to kill each other for one reason or another!! Neighbour against neighbour, workmate against workmate, proletarian against proletarian.”

The IMF in Yugoslavia: “Milosevic was an economic liberal (and political conservative). He was director of a major Belgrade bank in 1978-82 and an economic reformer even as Belgrade party boss in 1984-86. The policy proposals commissioned by the ‘Milosevic Commission’ in May 1988 were written by liberal economists and could have been a leaf straight out of the IMF book.” ”They were fully aware of their disastrous social consequences and increasingly sought to divert the struggles of the working class which these measures produced into bloody nationalist conflicts.

WHY IS THE U.S. BOMBING YUGOSLAVIA?: ”The working class movement brought together Yugoslavs of every ethnic background. The movement was at least implicitly revolutionary, and it terrified the international elite, for if successful it might easily spread beyond Yugoslavia and spell the end of the smoothly-managed transition from Communist to capitalist forms of elite rule in Eastern Europe. As the elite are aware, successful revolution and true democracy anywhere could well lead to revolution everywhere. As the working class movement grew, the Yugoslav ruling elite increasingly faced a stark choice: either smash the growing movement or go under. Rather than lose their grip on power, they decided to dismember the working class movement by dismembering the country. The dissolution of the former Yugoslavia in 1991 and the ethnic fighting and atrocities are parts of a carefully orchestrated elite strategy to divide and destroy the working class movement.”

The Empire’s new clothes: ”Milosevic once “a man we can do business with” (19), in the words of Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. envoy to the Bosnian peace talks in 1995, became, after the Serbian government refusal to go long with N.A.T.O. , the “new Hitler”.”

Morality or Western Interests: NATO in Yugoslavia: “…To encourage the transition toward a so-called free market economy, but ultimately, in practice; what that meant was the dismantling of the system of self-managed enterprises. … In other words, it’s a country that had been literally impoverished as the result of macroeconomic reforms. At the same time, that has created conditions that fueled ethnic conflicts. Yugoslavia has been subjected to very major macroeconomic reforms going back to the 1980s, but the climax was reached in 1990, under the pro-US government of Prime Minister Ante Markovic, where the IMF-sponsored reform was implemented. And it virtually contributed to fracturing the Yugoslav Federation.”

A Fool’s Account: Diana Johnstone, Yugoslavia and Her Delusion: ”The aggressive “liberalization” policies of the West, however, were merely half of the equation. The internal fragmentation of the country along nationalist lines, while to a certain key extent sponsored and exacerbated by the West, was a largely independent phenomenon and a function of the internal dynamics of the Yugoslav space that had its roots in the late 19th century.”


Residents in Mariupol burned down a tank when they chased away the Right Sector and the Kyiv army. They wrote on it: “This is for Odessa, you bastards”. It is not known how many people the new government in Kyiv has murdered since they confiscated power on 22 February, 2014.